 Thank you for the invitation. It's the rule of the session. I will do just a 10 minutes comments, but not quite far from the previous paper, because I had the experience of trying to work with those problems of international convention. As we have seen, the heritage world list sees less than 1,000 archaeological sites all over the world. And 1,000 archaeological sites, that's probably what is destroyed every day all over the world. Of course, it's not the Machu Picchu or the Stone Age destroyed every day, but that's a lot of very important sites. There is no general convention on the problem of preventive archaeology. There is just one, not a convention, but lower level, the New Daily Not Convention. But yes, in 1956, if I remember, it's just a declaration explaining that for the public works, it would be necessary to do something. And so when I was at the head of the National Institute for preventive French National Institutes for preventive archaeology, the INRAPA, we tried with other colleagues from other countries to promote a convention on preventive archaeology. And the direction of the UNESCO had nothing against that. But the condition would be to organize a preliminary conference in the UNESCO in Paris. But the UNESCO, unfortunately, had no money for that. So they could give the place, the room, but not any money. So we tried. That was in 2006 or 2007. We tried to organize such a conference, but it was too complicated. So it's one of the possible ways to go further. It would be to organize with all our forces to organize in the UNESCO a preliminary conference to promote such a general international convention on preventive archaeology. But that means anywhere several years had works. We tried in lower level, always with the UNESCO with colleagues from different Western African countries. It was from a part of the French colonies that we have seen on the map. We tried in 2007. We organized in 2007 in a workshop in the capital city of Mauritania with the UNESCO, with the Mauritanian Heritage Institute, and various Western African countries to promote such a general declaration that was the so-called appeal of a workshop in 2007. It was this conference and this appeal where this declaration was published. One of the editor was Nathan Schlanger. And it was admitted, the developers were also came to the conference. It was, for instance, metal mines in Mauritania. They agreed to give money for preventive archaeology. But a few months after, the government changed. And it was told that the money of the developers would not come to the Institute for Mauritanian Heritage, but would come directly to the president of the state. That means that the money, of course, will disappear. And that's one of the big problems with a lot of countries in the world. Sometimes there are very good official laws. One of the best laws, heritage law, is the law of Haiti. But of course, never, in fact, used. And we have now Malta Convention. That's a good beginning. But it's only a small part of the world and one of the richest part of the world. But all over Africa, Asia, and so on, it's very difficult. I had a meeting one time with the director of the heritage in China, in Beijing. And I was explaining the program for Africa, where now China is very hard for metal and a lot of wealth. But he told me that he could do nothing for archaeology inside the Chinese company because it was too high political problem. So just to finish about Malta, I would like to go further than Malta. I see at least two problems. The first one is that some countries are going back. One of the best known cases is Hungary. Hungary recently changed the law to limit the time and to limit the money. And that's probably not the only case. And probably the EAA would have to be more offensive about this kind of problem. And the second problem is for Malta and preventive archaeology. That Malta is very general and don't say anything about the organization of preventive archaeology in the countries. And I see that in some countries like France, the development of commercial archaeology had quite also go to the worst and worst results. There is, of course, official discourse that we are all public or commercial archaeologists. We are all brothers and sisters. And everybody tried to do the best. But at least what I can see in France, and it will be more explained tomorrow afternoon in the session that I am organizing with Maria Pia Guermandi, what I can see at least in France is that with the economic crisis, the situation and the price are lower and lower. And the working position and the scientific results are also going worse and worse. So that was few remarks in 10 minutes. Thank you for your attention.