 What's an example of objective and non-objective thinking? I was watching a debate with a rabbi and thought about this when he brought up that he's never met an objective person. So objective thinking is thinking, right? In a sense, it's redundant. It means that you're referring to facts, you're referring to reality, you're being logical and rational. Non-objective thinking is not really thinking. Non-objective thinking is really when you're using emotions, you're letting emotions interfere, you're letting emotions move you in one direction or another, you're letting that impact your decision making or you're evading certain facts, you're purposely not looking in certain directions, you're only using facts that are appropriate, that fit what you think the conclusion should be. Objective means taking into account all the facts, applying to reality, using logic, not letting emotions intervene and not letting your biases intervene. Objective thinking is hard because it's very hard to let go of your biases, it's very hard to look at reality and actually examine the facts and make sure you have all the available evidence and are not overlooking anything. That requires real effort. So I can understand him saying he's never met an objective, somebody who's really objective because it's unusual to find people who really make an effort in their thinking to be objective, to be fact-based, to be reality-based. What we need today, what I call the new intellectual, would be any man or woman who is willing to think. Meaning, any man or woman who knows that man's life must be guided by reason, by intellect, not by feelings, wishes, whims, or mystic revelations. Any man or woman who values his life and who does not want to give in to today's cult of despair, cynicism, and impotence and does not intend to give up the world to the dark ages and to the role of the collectivist broads. All right, before we go on, reminder, please like the show. We've got 163 live listeners right now, 30 likes. That should be at least 100. I figure at least 100 of you actually like the show. Maybe they're like 60 of the Matthews out there who hate it, but at least the people who are liking it, you know, I want to see a thumbs up. There you go. Start liking it. I want to see that go to 100. All it takes is a click of a click of a thing, whether you're looking at this and you know the likes matter. It's not an issue of my ego. It's an issue of the algorithm. The more you like something, the more the algorithm likes it. So you know, and if you don't like the show, give it a thumbs down. Let's see your actual views being reflected in the likes. But if you like it, don't just sit there, help get the show promoted. Of course, you should also share and you can support the show at yourunbrookshow.com slash support on Patreon or Subscribestar or locals and show your support for all, for the work, for the value, hopefully you're receiving from this. And of course, don't forget, if you're not a subscriber, even if you just come here to troll, or even if you're here like Matthew to defend Marks, then you should subscribe because that way you'll know when to show up. You'll know what shows are on, when they're on. You'll get notified, right? So yes, like, share, subscribe, support. Like, share, subscribe, support. There you go. Easy. One, all of those, please.