 Så, Lin, please join me here and say a few words about, is it so simple with the emissions? Well, no, as you already hinted at, in contrast then to the reduced territorial emissions or comparably low territorial emissions, the emissions of carbon dioxide in other countries caused by Swedish consumption are increasing. We have been significantly increasing also over time over the last 20 years. We saw an increase in 50% of these emissions. And this is then driven by our large and growing import. Much of our imported carbon dioxide emissions come from other European countries. But there is also a growing share of embedded carbon dioxide import from countries like China and India. So from China, for instance, we import electric and electronic equipment that comes with quite high carbon dioxide embedded in it due to the current energy mix of China. So that's one thing. Another example of a factor that influences our external carbon dioxide footprint is our meat consumption. And now I want to change slide. Maybe you can help me, Katja, because, yeah, thanks, this one. So here you see this total Swedish meat consumption over the last 20 years. And as you can see, the consumption of nationally produced meat, that is the blue, the dark blue, has stayed relatively constant over this period. Whereas the red color, which is our imported meat, that consumption has increased. Now I think this is an interesting example, not only in terms of discussion of external versus internal or territorial footprint. It is also really interesting because it highlights that this story is not only about creating cleaner and more efficient production systems, but it's also about lifestyle choices and the volume of consumption. But it's about import dependencies that actually bring the embedded carbon into Sweden, right? Yeah. Are there any drivers that could be tapped into here in order to reduce this kind of external footprint of a country from Sweden or other countries? I mean, trade volumes are increasing and much more carbon is transported along those that are actually traded. I think that the major drivers that you mentioned, the least priority type of drivers, they can never be disregarded if you want to reduce your footprint. I mean, no matter whether it is a territorial or a consumption-based footprint, let's say. And we recently did a report for the Swedish EPA, where we looked at possible policy instruments and other measures that could be used to reduce the Swedish external footprint in terms of negative health and environment impacts in other countries. And one of the key recommendations in that study was to make sure that if Sweden and what Sweden does in this area is not only on the desk of the Ministry of Environment and Energy, but rather becomes something of great concern also to ministries of finance and foreign affairs and enterprise and innovation and so on. And this is not only then to ensure a broad mandate for any action plan, but also actually to open up for the possibility that policies in other fields that may have the potential to become indirect drivers for sustainability outcomes are actually tapped into with this work. And I think that if you want to use closer to me, sorry, thanks, you can tap into these indirect drivers of sustainability at various scales and maybe just on a closing note to become a bit more concrete. We were recently in Cambodia mapping improvements in chemicals management at the national level. And there was this really important piece of legislation on pesticides and fertilizers that had been previously missing. And it became clear to us during this study that the primary driver of that piece of legislation that we put in place so quickly was not the international agreement and the commitments that Cambodia had to these where this is also asked for, but rather the new rice policy of the Cambodian government which aimed at drastically increasing the rice exports. And in order to do that you need to sort out the situation of pesticides and fertilizers. So I think that was a clear case also when you see other types of drivers having a more sustainability outcome in this case than in terms of improved chemicals management infrastructure at the national level. Do you think there are many such cases at play which we should know about? Is it common in your world to see this confluence of interest between the economic growth or competitiveness type of motivation? I think in terms of chemicals management that business opportunities and market access is definitely a very important driver for sorting out hazardous chemicals in a company, say, or in a sector. Thanks a lot, Lin. We should stay on the trade topic here.