 Good evening, everybody. Thanks for joining us. This meeting is just for your information is being recorded for those who are in the tenant tonight will be available on the website. So, just so for your information, my name is Bradley Radovich. I'm part of the Fort Worth department transportation, public works and capital delivery team. I'd like to talk a little bit tonight about this project, this upcoming project city for being done by the city of Fort Worth. I'm the project manager for this for this upcoming improvements at the intersection of. University drive and West 5th street. Thank you for attending this meeting. We hoped that this will be. Almost as good as being at a live presentation. So, we'll try to make it our best. In order to make it clear as possible for everybody, please. We can hold the questions to the end or I'll open a time for question and answer at the end. And you can also use the chat function. To ask questions during the presentation, my colleagues are going to be monitoring that. And we'll address them as well after this formal part of the presentation, which should only take. And 10 to 15 minutes or so at the most. It's very short. So. See, I don't Jeff, I don't see. Ms. Beck, so I'm going to introduce some of my colleagues tonight. The lead engineer for the project is Ganesh Gopalan. He is with us tonight. He's a professional engineer from incorporated in Dallas. The consulting engineer Raul Lopez. He's my boss, my associate, my program manager for the arterials in the transportation and public works department. And last, but not least is Jeff Allen. Jeffrey Allen of TPW's communications specialists. So. He's the one that makes all this possible for for me to be here tonight. So. Hopefully, everybody can see the slide. Let me know if you can't. So, this the agenda for tonight, this is this presentation is meant to provide information for the public for you about the scope of the project. And it's currently this project's currently advancing through the design phase. We're going to also talk touch on the schedule and budget. The primary objective of the project is to signalize the intersection. To optimize the traffic operations and improve safety. For the motoring public and pedestrians in this site. So. Pretty simple that 1, so this is a overview of the site project location. This project's located at the intersection of course of West 5th and university drive again. It's about 2 miles west of city hall in the Linwood area. The traffic conditions exist currently at the site and include a stop condition. For West 5th street in each direction. University drive is a through traffic. It's through traffic in the north, south direction 2 lanes. 2 through lanes on a left turn in each each direction. West 5th street is a single lane in each direction currently and will be at the end. This project basically will address safety and traffic flow locally at this at this intersection. So currently there's the 2 stop signs are indicated here. So, I just wanted to point that make sure. So the project is going to improve the traffic flow at this intersection primarily by the installation of traffic signals. And primarily they will protect the left turn movements. From West 5th street on the university drive. In each direction, and it will also give signal protection to left turns on to 5th street. From university drive in both both directions. This this signalization will greatly improve the safety of all turning vehicles. Particularly those turning left. Onto the busy university drive thoroughfare there. So, from each direction of 5th street. We're also upgrading the pedestrian facilities with crosswalks per ramps. Destin signals and making this intersection fully accessible. All elements of the design, of course, will address applicable codes for the new construction of public facilities. I think I'm primarily more familiar with a day, perhaps you are as well. So. That's for pedestrian access. This is an overhead view of the proposed new layout. Of the intersection, the turn lane capacity of university drive. It's going to be is being evaluated and calculating the length needed for left turn lanes to store store turning vehicles. The lane lines, the stop bars, crosswalks, I'll be restriped in this project. Pedestrian ranch and crosswalks will be installed. There will be only 1 walk across university as shown. Here on the north side. The north crossing of. If there and this is the standard usage based on the usage levels of. Best 5th street, we only really need that 1 crossing there. Each corner is going to have push button activators for pedestrian crossing. Indications so down here, you if you're a pedestrian in Fort Worth, you've seen these. I would bet you've seen these typical. Pedestrian push button activation. Signs and buttons, so these will be installed at the site as well. This is just an engineering. View of the same layout, pardon the. Quality of the it's I really wanted just to show that there will. Mass times will be extending here that hold the signal heads. So you'll see, I just wanted to show those locations. It's kind of I understand it's hard to see. I'm sorry. But for indications for say, he's found, you'll see that there's a mass time here with these indicators. So they're pretty visible and they're very it's very common. The locations of these, it's nothing that will confuse anybody. It's just. I just wanted to show it because it's part of the construction and. You know, we have to drill case that's the 1st supports for the foundations. And so. When you see the amount there, I just wanted to make sure that you knew that that was part of what they were doing. So. It shouldn't be an issue for any driver. Well, it's a little bit about the funding it's. It's funded primarily by the 2018, well, totally by the 2018 bond program. The overall budget is $770,000, which includes the engineering. Real estate services, utility coordination, city administration costs, and the construction budget, which we estimate at this point is $400,000. So it's, it's got a little bit of a contingency in there. So, but overall, that's our, our funding for this project. We're currently, as we said before, in the design phase, we're nearing pre final. Design level other activities that are continuing include the utility investigation and the right away. Acquisition process for any real estate that's needed to construct the. The facilities there, we expect to be ready to procure a contractor and start construction by late summer of this year. We expect that construction to take 6 months in total. Ending in January of 2023. We don't anticipate like major impact to traffic patterns during construction, but, you know, there'll be some periodic lane closures associated with the work. We'll work with the contractor to minimize the impact to traffic during construction, of course, especially during rush hours peak hours. As we go forward, that would, that's part of our task. So, and then I told you it was short. So, if it seems short, it seems short to me, but we are excited about the project and implementing these improvements at this location for the citizens. This is my contact information. It's also on the website. We're going to continue to update the website as we move forward with the project. And we appreciate your taking the time with us tonight. So, I'm, I'm open to questions now. And along with my colleagues, perhaps, let's try to answer any questions that you can have. This is Mark Smith. I live in Linwood. Yes, my question is, how is this intersection being signalized going to interact with the unsafe condition that the city put in place when they change the lanes that no one still. Understands at 6, right? So unsafe condition you created already. How is that's going to interact with that? We are aware of the tapering lane coming northbound from West 7th. Yeah, the one that people look like they're about to cause accidents every day. Yes, we are going to forward that concern to our profit management staff. So they can look at the condition and restrike or provide additional signage if necessary. It seems like it's only a block away from what you're doing here. You think you'd include it. I understand that will this light yet another light that goes red to university and stays that way until someone sits on the intersection at 530 in the morning when they're trying to go to work like the ones at trail and Lancaster. Right, are you talking about trail driving Lancaster? Well, both of those just recently, after a year, finally don't make you sit on a red every morning at 530 in the morning because they had it set to traffic coming when people are trying to go to work. This one needs to be green to university until someone sits on the signal on 5th and off peak times like that to not create yet another impediment to getting to work. Everybody understand correctly the one at trail and Lancaster has been correct. It finally got corrected after a year. So I'm taking notes so that we can forward these to our traffic management faults. Yeah, let them know I finally, it's super excited that they finally listened. It took a year just like they left the unsafe condition. Just, oh, yeah, the unsafe condition was even more unsafe when they had it strike the other way and they changed it after a week when they figured out they were about to cause deaths. It would just get the feedback. This is, this is the purpose of this meeting so we can learn about things that are going on in addition to that. Are you going to invite more people to use 5th street by making it easier to get on to it? No, the purpose of this project is to allow, there was a study done and 11 accidents occurred within just a single year, the purpose of the signal is to allow gaps for people that are fit to be able to safely turn north on our southbound. Which could increase traffic on 5th street. There is a possibility. Yeah. Just checking. I've got a question, please. Can you hear me? My name is David Dodge and I live at 2913 Mary Mac. I am the zoning chair for the Wood neighborhood association and the West 7th neighborhood alliance. And I guess I have my 1st question is, where did this project even come from? We never heard about it. Until it showed up in the mailbox and on the internet, you know, in the last month and we never had a chance as a neighborhood to weigh in on it. And I think any effort to create more traffic on 5th street is a huge mistake and it's going to back traffic up at Carroll Street, which is already a horrible intersection. And 5th street is in horrible condition. There's speeders on it all the time. And this is going to increase traffic on 5th street. It's also going to increase traffic, cutting through windwood, turning on Templeton, turning on Mary Mac, and cutting through to the apartments. And to me, the correct way to solve the problem that you've got with the Rex is to put bollards out there like 6th street ass. Where you can only turn right into it as you're headed northbound and you can only turn right going out of it on University to head northbound and you can't cross it. But we've already got an arterial at 7th street 2 blocks away. We've got another one at White Settlement 6th blocks away. And we've got a pedestrian walkway 2 blocks away at Bristol. And I don't understand why we're spending 3 quarter million bucks or half a million bucks, whatever it costs to do this. I mean, we got a whole lot bigger problems than this intersection here. And I don't, you know, where did this come from? So, precisely, this meeting is to let public, you know, present the project. This is just the beginning. This is the first meeting that we have. And the signal, this is a signalized product or signal intersection or intersection signalization project. So, the scope of the project is basically signalizing the intersection and then making ADA compliant for pedestrians. That's why the budget is so low and typically signalized intersections, those products are basically a list of intersections, and they're not highly publicized. So, that may be why it's the first time you hear about it. When we have arterials, you know, that are in the bond program, those are those are publicized more than the intersections or signalize signalize intersection intersections is. Regarding traffic increase, I cannot tell you whether this is going to increase or not. It will improve safety. We have shown that there's been 11 accidents within the year. And the purpose of it is, you know, first and foremost, we've got to think about safety. And how many accidents did you pause when you changed it at six? I wouldn't be able to tell you that. So, we'll look at that. We'll forward that to our traffic management falls, traffic engineers division. We'll then have to look at that. I have a, may I speak? Absolutely. Okay. I'm Eva Bonilla, and I'm the media past chair of Linwood neighborhood. And when we were trying to get a signal light at 5th, and Carol, y'all with traffic told us that it was too close to the signal light on 7th street. And to me, it is more, I guess it's more of a casualty to have it at 5th and university than it would have been to have it at 5th and Carol. And so we got a four-way stop sign at 5th and Carol. But we, you know, now they're telling us that y'all are telling us that it's okay to have a signal light closer to a terrible intersection. I mean, that intersection at university, all at Camp Bowie and all of those, that's worse than just having the 7th street signal light. So may I ask you a question, Ms. Bonilla? You categorize it as worse. Can you elaborate what you mean by worse? Is there more backup or is it safety related as you go northbound? Okay. You said, if everybody says that the signal light is, you know, and now we're talking about the northbound on university for a long time, as soon as it turns green, it's like a speedway. Everybody guesses it to get out, to get over there. And so the speed is increased twice followed this at 7th street and Carol. And the signal deterrence is speeding because you have to watch whether it's yellow or red. So that's one of the deterrence that's because there's no signal, there's no impediment from West 7th all the way to white settlement. That's why people speed that's that's one of the reasons why we will speed by putting the signal on a crosswalk across the road that will make people, and I'm not saying everybody, but that will catch the attention of people and slow down because they know there's a signal coming up and they'll have a red ball at the approach. So you're telling me that the signal at 5th is going to be synchronized with the signal on 7th and university? No, I'm not saying that I'm saying if you if you pass the signal at West 7th, there is a chance that you may not get a red on 5th. Therefore, you'll have to slow down. You won't be able to speed like you do today. Therefore, improving safety. The longer the stretch of road without any impediments, the more people will speed up. Well, people speed because they're frustrated. And all this is going to do is this is going to create a tremendous amount of frustration and people are going to dive down 5th street. So they don't have to wait on another traffic light to take them to 7th street to sit in that left turn lane while it goes through Bailey, Camp Bowie and 7th street and finally allows them to turn left. That you're not solving a problem. You're creating a problem. 5th Street is a horrible street. And if you don't repair 5th Street and put up a stop sign or speed bumps. I know you don't like speed bumps. So let's talk about a stop sign at Curry and at Foch. Just to get the traffic to slow down on 5th Street, you're making a huge mistake. And then when they get to Carroll Street, there's parking on both sides of the street at that intersection. And one car can't, two cars can't get through it. So if you're coming out of Montgomery Plaza or you're turning left on Carroll, if there's a car sitting there, you have to wait. I mean, this I guarantee you that you are going to increase traffic on 5th Street twofold. And if you deny it, I mean, we're going to be out there in a year talking about it. But this needs more study. This is not correct. And you're not solving a problem. You're creating a problem. And we appreciate the feedback. And this is precisely what these meetings are all about, about hearing feedback from you all. And I realize this is the first time you hear about it, because we haven't done anything yet. We're in the design phase. So I'm going to forward all this feedback to our traffic engineers for us to talk about it and consider these other options that you're talking about. And you say a stop sign or some sort of return at Kerry and Folk Street would be helpful. Yeah. I mean, if you're going to, if you're going to signalize that intersection, you're going to double the traffic on 5th Street, I guarantee you. And it's going to turn into a drag strip when people that normally go up to 7th and then go left. And so you're going to have to slow them down somehow. But there's already a stop sign, but it has to be like a four-way stop sign there or a three-way, a four-way stop sign. Because there's one on Kerry. And there's one on Folk Street. Yeah. And on Foch. But it's got to be a four-way stop sign for that intersection to stop everything. And then on top of that, I would have you, I would have rather had used the bond money to repair 5th Street because 5th Street is terrible. Nobody repairs it. It's always terrible. 6th Street, 6th Street too. Yeah, 6th, 5th and 6th Street. 5th and 6th Street, I agree. They're both awful. Unfortunately, this is 2018 bond. So that has passed all those, you know, all of that has been you know, voted on 2018. So this, this is the red not until the 2018 bond, I should say. On the 2022 bond, we have a number of other segments. I don't believe that 5th and 6th are there. But again, you know, I'm taking note of these so that we can put them through our, the folks that are do, do the product programming so that we can put them on the list. Right. So what you have now is a fate of complete by only presenting this when it's already gotten to the point where the funding is already allocated to it. Yeah, this was correct. So we can't stop you. Well, I'm not saying, I'm not saying you can't stop it. If we look at it and if it doesn't make any sense, we might do something else. We're getting the feedback and we're going to look at it. Now, putting the signal or not putting a signal doesn't have any impact on whether the street in that shape or not surface wise. But those are two different things, whether that's going to increase traffic or not. We'll have to look at, we'll have to look at traffic patterns and see if it is likely that's going to increase traffic patterns. Let me ask you. You, you know, I'm confused why you wouldn't have done a traffic study before you started the project. I'd have to talk to our traffic management folks. They created the project. I'm sorry. I don't have those details. I don't know. I've raised my hand for a long time, but I don't really know how this worked. It sounds like we just need to start speaking. But what I'm hearing is basically very logical information from the people who live in the area and travel that road daily multiple times and illogical information from the people who don't. I do travel down that road multiple times a day. And I'm in complete agreement with what other people have voiced. Putting a traffic signal there, especially if it's not going to be synchronized, will be a really bad idea. There used to be three lanes on university and now those shrink to two exactly at fifth. And a lot of cars go to the far right lane to cut it to the person in front of them. So if there's a traffic light there, there is going to be all those people on the right lane who all they want to do is cut in front. But that's going to be causing more accidents. Also, I don't see why if the concern is that there are vehicles making left turns onto university. I don't see why putting a sign that says no left turn on both sides of West Fifth wouldn't solve the issue. That seems a lot more logical. And if the issue is that there is money allocated to the something here and you feel like you have to put some sort of control between Seventh and White Settlement, it seems like the best way to do that would be to maybe change that signal at Bristol and make that a traffic light, at least then you're still breaking up the flow, but not two blocks away from a major intersection. Well, I apologize. Somehow the application just kicked me out of the meeting. So I missed all of that. Can you repeat? I apologize. No, no, that's okay. What I was saying is that I've been listening to what you folks have been saying on both sides and I'm in complete agreement with people who travel that road daily. Unless you travel it daily, then you wouldn't know all the issues that we encounter. I traveled down the road three times, four times a day. And when the university was changed from three lanes to two lanes, right at Fifth Street, that's where the three lanes end. And a lot of vehicles will move onto that far right lane and then cut in front of traffic. Just like Eva was saying, because they're just rushing through. So if there's a traffic signal there and it's not synchronized with the one at the major intersection, there's going to be a line of vehicles in the far right lane that all they're wanting to do is cut in front of the people who are positioned in the correct lanes. And that is not safe. So to me, the most logical solution would be to have signs on West Fifth that say no left turn. You're not allowed to make a left turn onto university period. Then that solves the issue of the accidents, because having a traffic light two blocks away from the major intersection just doesn't work. If you have money and you need to do something in that stretch between West Seventh and White Settlement, it would make more sense to change what's currently just the pedestrian signal on Bristol and make that a traffic signal. If you have to spend the money on something and you can't be on refinishing the roads, they're terrible. Let me ask you this. If you put that as a traffic signal on Bristol, aren't you inviting people to drive straight into our neighborhood instead? Well, what I'm saying is if the answer to the question, aren't you, instead of making people drive along the bottom edge of our neighborhood, have them drive straight into it? So, as I was trying to say, if their argument is that they have money that they need to spend on some sort of traffic signal on that stretch, then it would make more sense to put it there. But what I- It would make more sense to put it there and then have them drive straight into our house. But like I was saying, what would be the ideal situation is to just put signs on West Fifth that says no left turn. And I agree with you and I hope that they don't listen to the second part of it. And that they certainly don't put a traffic signal on West Fifth. That's just- that doesn't make any sense, safety-wise. So, I appreciate the feedback again. I'm taking notes and I'm looking at the map. Or was it Kerry and Foch? Those are the last two cross streets before we get to University. Oh, when you speak to the- I think you said the traffic signal people? Our traffic engineer and his group, yes. Okay. If you talk to them, tell them an easy fix would be that at the intersection of University and Seventh, heading North, make both lanes on the extreme right turn only to the right onto Seventh Street heading downtown. Right now, the one in the middle that I'm talking about is the one that goes straight or can turn. And unfortunately, it should just turn and that's the one that's causing the problems to get into when they cross over and cut people off. So, if they would make that, the two lanes heading North at University at Seventh, make them both turn right to downtown, it would stop that problem. Well, I have to disagree with that. It makes them turn on the Sixth Street. My business is on Sixth Street and it's pretty easy for them to move right up and turn right on Sixth Street. You're going to block my traffic from coming up University. No, because that lane would go straight there. It would be like no lane. That would be a two lane wide lane and they could turn on to Sixth Street without being killed. Right now, they're being run over. I don't agree with the traffic pattern that's there right now, but I don't really in favor of two right hand turns when people are sitting there trying to make right hand turns onto Seventh Street from University. I think those two lanes dedicated to right hand turns is not a good idea. Agreed. I don't think it's a good idea to go straight either. Well, let's put it back to the Sixth Lanes that it was when it was when it worked proper. I will put that option again. I mean, will we bring that option on as well? I know this is just recently converted from Sixth Lanes to the 2 of 3. Or 5. Yeah. The problem you see on that turn to that right hand turn onto Seventh Street is if you're on the right hand side or the inside lane and both lanes turn right, some people take that turn to go a wide and it's really tough on the second lane to try to make the right. I think it's a dangerous two dedicated to right hand turn. So I stated that once. I'm sorry to repeat, but sorry. If you don't know the comment, if you I mean, if you ultimately end up doing this, even after the comments that are made here and you put this light in, I cannot understand why you would not make it sink with Seventh Street. That looks like to me, if you go ahead, which I disagree with the use of that area of spending the money to do that. But if it gets done, it makes no sense that it's not synced as far as I'm concerned, but you can have all this traffic flowing north that's not going to be synced on Fifth. You need to let all that traffic get on going down the road. And with the fact that they've caused this problem that stacks traffic up on two lanes instead of three, you probably could have it back up from Fifth all the way to Seventh. Oh, yeah, absolutely would. There's no question about that. It would certainly do that. You would make the Seventh Street, Camp Bury, Bailey, that intersection will become even worse. Yes. Ganesh, do we have a queuing analysis? We don't have the numbers at the moment. But again, coordination is something that would be accomplished with the West Seventh Street is required. And it is required based on the proximity of that location. But what we have noticed again, based on the current traffic patterns, which again, there's a possibility that that can change. But given the current volumes on West Fifth, you know, we don't expect that to take a lot of the green time away from university. So the queuing shouldn't be bad. Again, the main issues that were observed at this intersection were during the peak times, again, achieving those gaps for the left turns, getting out of West Fifth Street was an issue leading to the crashes that Raul mentioned. So, you know, again, during the peak times, the traffic volumes are still not heavy on West Fifth Street, but we're just trying to provide the goal is to protect the few cars that are making that left turn. During the peak times when, you know, university does have quite a heavy flow. And again, as I mentioned, the coordination signals would be coordinated to make sure that, you know, you're not hitting a red once you cross Seventh Street going north or south. And during the off peak, sorry, and during the off peak hours, you know, they would be actuated by a need. So if there's traffic on West Fifth Street, you know, only then there will be a green time provided to them, or otherwise university will stay on green. So off-peak will be steady green unless there's traffic on West Fifth trying to get across. Gordon. Who do we send information to that the, it was mentioned earlier, the trail drive and university intersection and those lights. I travel that way three times a day. They don't work right. They're not synced right, especially the westbound on trail hitting university to make a left hand turn or go straight. They don't work. Who do I call to get someone out there to fix the problem on getting left hand or straight? I can explain it, but it's not the point to do today right here, but it doesn't work and do it five, three times a day. So can you just quickly tell me in what direction? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. If someone's coming from the stock yard area coming east and there, if no one's there and I pull up to make a left hand turn, sometimes that gives me a left hand turn. Sometimes it doesn't. And when it does, it's only like two cars time to get through it. But if you're, if you're, if you're not, if you miss the left hand turn, the green never comes on for you to go ahead and proceed. The green stays off. So I can sit there, miss the left hand turn and I ought to get a green, but I don't get a green because no one was in the right lane to go straight on trail. My point is the left hand turn signal part from trail going west to university is the part that's this screwed up. The new segment of trail drive going west and university. I mean, going, yes, turning west to turn left down to university. That's right. Okay. I'll pass that along for a traffic engineer. Thank you very much. Yeah. This is David Dodson. Am I speaking again? Yes, David. Go ahead. Okay. So I want to go back to solving the problem without a signalized intersection. And Linda's idea of no left turn works great. People can, if they're coming down Fifth Street, they can take a left on Norwood, they can go over the seventh street, take a right and they're at the intersection. They can go anywhere they want to from that intersection. We don't need to signalize it. It would be much better either no left turn or putting bollards out there just like Sixth Street has so that people can't turn left into it as they're headed southbound or can't as they're headed westbound, turn southbound on university. But you are missing the mark so much if you think that this is not going to double the traffic on Fifth Street. And it's also going to increase traffic of people cutting through Inwood period. And I feel like that we need to concentrate on keeping traffic where it was designed to be. And that's on the major streets, White Settlement University, 7th Street. And we don't need to be creating cut-throughs inside of that parameter forum. That makes no sense. Solve the problem by changing the way people react to that intersection. But we don't need to encourage people to take a left because they're frustrated. And that's what's going to happen is people are going to, you know, as they're coming down university headed south and they stop there, they're going to go ahead and make it their habit every time they come to that intersection to turn left down Fifth instead of going up to seventh and turning left. But I don't know how we can go about having another meeting on this, but I'm sure going to reach out to Elizabeth back on it. And, you know, I think that this bears way more study in than what we've given it. It sounds simple to you guys. People that live here, it is not simple. And, you know, if we can't get Fifth Street fixed and we start dumping more traffic on it, then, you know, we're opening up a can of worms that, you know, we're not going to be able to, you know, overcome. And the intersection of Carol and Fifth is a quagmire already and it's going to exacerbate that. So it's important to me that we have more dialogue on this. The brakes need to be tapped. And I'm going to reach out to Ms. Dick back tomorrow and find out, you know, how we can go about doing that. So did I agree? Did I hear you right, Mr. Did you say on 6th Street, we put Bollards or something, or we put a no left turn sign? I'm trying. Yeah, there's Bollards out there in the middle of university where you can't turn left. You can't turn east on Fifth Street as you're headed south on university. And you can't cross university. Exactly. As you come out of 6th Street, you have to turn north. There's a median university. There's a medium. It's called a medium. Yeah, you can't go over that medium. Yeah. Yeah. It would be so much less expensive if you extended the medium to Fifth. And that's a lot of problems. That's a lot. We wouldn't do Bollards. We would do a median. Yeah. Yeah. Oh, I wanted to ask another question because we've been asking for a traffic study for our neighborhood for years. They keep promising there's going to be a traffic study. No one has ever done a traffic study for our neighborhood. Well, we can prove the cut through traffic and the inconvenience. And what happens on 5th and 6th? How can we get it? I mean, there's money to put a signal life and no money for a traffic study. Again, I will pass that on to the traffic engineer. I apologize, guys. We deliver the products that they give us. So I'm not a traffic engineer. They say, this is a project. Please deliver this project. So I'll pass that on to Mr. Raj Gupta who's our traffic engineer. And Rajesh Gupta. Do you PTA? Yes. I know him well. Yeah. Okay. So, okay. So we're, you know, we're throwing the idea out there of basically prohibiting left or movements on West, I mean, West 50. Whether it's by sign or by physical impediment, like a median or something. I think that would solve the problem. Okay. Sounds like there's sort of a consensus on that, right? Agreed. Okay. That's good to hear. This is what these meetings are all about. You know, we start with sign, and I wish we would have had an earlier meeting. But with COVID, you know, it just made it a little more difficult. But we'll take this into consideration and we'll talk to Rajesh. And then we will cite for another meeting within the next, I want to say, three months or so to bring you back information. Or we, if you want, actually, if you want to copy everybody put their email address, all those that wanted a copy of the presentation. Yes. Yeah. And we will do a summary of the Q and A questions and answers and provided to put it on the website or email it to those that provide the email address. Anonymous wants to speak. Oh, thank you. So I didn't realize I was anonymous. I'm Nancy Tuff and I'm in the so seven area and do a lot of walking. So I'm very interested in this topic. And I just want to say that I think the idea of a traffic study is excellent because I've noticed a big increase just since the white settlement bridge has been open. So I think you're going to see a lot of different traffic patterns as more people realize that that bridge has is now completed. And especially as more and more apartments are being built in the general West 7th, Linwood, Arlington Heights area. So I love the idea of a traffic study. Okay. That makes sense. And that is correct. You know, with the new white settlement bridge, yeah, a lot of people may not have realized that is that is open. And that's another option for mobility in the area. But thank and thank you for allowing everybody to share their opinions. This was really helpful. That's what these spinning meetings are about getting input. So I just want to double check. I have Eva's email address, Jeff Miller, Don Mackenzie and my Kenji Kitchney, Jill Freer and Esquattro. Anybody else I missed? I haven't entered mine yet. Just take the dots and I'll get mine in. Okay. Take your time. Can you hear me? Yes, we can. Hi, my name is Stacy Shores. I'm the president of Linwood Neighborhood Association. Sorry, I could not point y'all webex because I'm on the road to Tombow. But would you please email me for any information for Linwood? Because I'm on the board. I'm sorry. Yeah, we will email you the presentation if you can maybe still out your email. Stacy, this is Jill Freer. We got you covered. We'll make sure this gets out to the neighborhood. Okay. Because I heard other people but not anybody on the board's email. So I just want to make sure that the board is getting everything. Sorry. I'm in Tombow or I don't know where I'm at. So I'm spotting reception. So just make sure everybody gets the information. Please. Thank you. Thank you. Appreciate it. Thank you so much. Thank you. Yeah. And Raul, I have board member emails. That's not an issue. It's people that aren't on the board that we would need emails for. Okay. Yeah, this is Brenda Vanley. Can you hear me? Brenda, we can hear you. Okay. I work in the building on the corner of fifth and university. And it does seem like in recent times we've had very few accidents. I don't know. The traffic is lighter and the accidents just don't happen during work hours like they did before. But any of the solutions are going to make it very hard to get in and out of those businesses close to that intersection. And I'm. That is the other side of the coin. Yes. Yes, very, very hard to. Especially, I mean, we're like, what, 100 feet from there? And it's not easy now to get out of our parking lot. And it's going to make it very difficult. But the median would be easier to get out of the parking lot. I just wouldn't be able to take my little shoot down Fifth Street that I like to take. And my email is j.punnerpal. I've entered it. I don't know if you have it there or not. At Gmail. So what is your email again? at j.punnerpal at gmail.com. Thank you. We'll just give it a few minutes to see if anybody else has any questions or anybody that joined late. I've got a lot, a lot to talk about with Raj. Sounds like we don't have any more questions. So we appreciate everybody's attendance and this great input. Again, we'll site for another meeting within the next two to three months and then we'll post, we'll send this presentation to all those that provided the email address. We'll post the the recording on the city's website. We do have a project site, right? Right, Jeff? Yes. We'll post it there and then we will provide questions and answers or post the question and answer right up for everybody to look at and review. Thank you very much and have a good evening. Thank you. Thank you so much. Thank you. Jared. Good night, everyone. Good night. Thank you.