 Brandon asked, well, Tucker Carlson and Andrew Young fear mass automation. Why am I not? Why or why not is this a concern? Again, I've talked about this many times. You can look it up. I've talked about robots taking jobs. You know, people have always been afraid of mass automation. This is the same Luddites that demonstrated in the 1800s, in the early 1800s, against the first factories, against the first technologies. The same people that in the 1980s were convinced that the PC was going to destroy millions of jobs. And they've been wrong every single time. And there's absolutely zero reason that they're not going to be wrong this time. The fact is that human needs are infinite. There is no limit to the stuff, the services that we need. I mean, it's just a lack of imagination that suggests that one day there will be no jobs in the economy because that's nonsense. And it doesn't appreciate the value of a human mind, but also the fact that computers and robots make us more productive and us able to do jobs we couldn't even imagine doing in the past. So robots will create more jobs than they destroy because they will make possible for human beings to do things they could never do before. Now, I'm speculating here, but let me also say that I don't think the world in 100 years is going to be divided into robots and humans. I think that's a silly way to look at it. You have to look at technology, technology that enhances human life. And that technology might be external in the sense of robots and computers. And it could be internal in the sense of things we can do to the human body that will make us better, more effective, more efficient. Now, I don't know if this is going to be possible, but imagine implanting the iPhone directly into your brain. Now, I don't know if that's possible. I guess I don't see why not. Of course, physical strength, imagine just a contraption that you put on your arm and you're suddenly 100 times stronger. So I see much more of that interaction between man and machine, man and computer than it's two separate things that are separate. So imagine if you could enhance in a sense the computing power of the human brain, take those aspects of the human brain that act like a computer and give the human brain direct access to a computer. I mean, that is truly, that would make IQ, whatever the hell that means, you know, the shoe intelligence less relevant because you could enhance it. And then it would make it so that all that mattered was what I mentioned called your ability to focus your mind. All that mattered was your ability to use the computer. So your ability to engage your mind, to think, to focus, to do what it is that human beings do, the unique consciousness that human beings have. So it wouldn't be constrained by how many computations you can do, by how much you can memorize because you wouldn't have to memorize because the memory could be stored separately. So just like today, we have become massively more productive because we have computers. If computers are 1000 times or a million times more powerful, we will become a million times more productive. But at the same time, our needs will become infinitely greater. So it just strikes me as an impossibility that we would reach a point where there would be no jobs. I think it's just the same old pessimistic lack of imagination, materialism, a materialistic view of the world, passive, static view of the world that Luddites have always had. Just now the Luddites are technologists. That's what's amazing. Now that the people are actually inventing the technology, who are the Luddites? This is the same argument Yuva Harari and many others are making these days. Siri thought I was talking to her so she woke up.