 We are moving to agenda item 2, of the 22nd meeting of 2018 standards, procedures and public appointments committee. The committee has been considering a complaint about a member of the Scottish Parliament and I will now read out a statement from the committee that sets out our findings. Diolch i weithio gyda sicrhau finsachol i gynnoddau cysylltu i gael ams-gweithio piwn o sgolwyr. Cysylltu i'r chweithio wedi wedi'i gael swyddfaeth sy'n gyfrannu i Mr Ricky Taylor ar Peter Chapman. Grirolau y gallwn ni'n cael ei wneud o'r Cod gilydd i'r sgolwyr i'r Sgolwyr i ddymaeithu i ddysglwyr eu cyfrannu i Aberdeen, That's the ANM group. When making representations on behalf of the company to members of the Gariach Area Committee of Aberdeenshire Council, the committee is unanimous in the decision reached on the complaint. It agrees with the findings, in fact, and conclusion of the commissioner, that there is no evidence to suggest that Peter Chapman's actions amounted to paid advocacy as prohibited by section 4 of the Code of Conduct for MSPs and by the interests of members of the Scottish Parliament Act. The committee looked carefully at the paid advocacy provisions of the 2006 act and the Code of Conduct. While the member did advocate on behalf of ANM group in his capacity as an MSP, we agree with the commissioner that there is no evidence to demonstrate that Peter Chapman, who shares in ANM group, are of a fixed value, agreed to act on behalf of ANM group in return for or an expectation of receiving a payment or benefit in kind from them. In addition, there was no evidence of a connection between the member's action and the level of interest due to him in respect of his shareholding. Full details of the complaint and the commissioner's investigations of it will be included in the committee's report, which will be published later this afternoon. Until that time, the report remains confidential, and neither I nor any other member of the committee will make further comment until it is published.