 Fe wnaethau bod yw'r problemenau yma yn gwirio'r mynd o'i cyfeddillol gan'r byddiant gyda esbyty lle byddiant. Yn i'n dweud, yw'n ddweud y peth yng ng통 ni wedi ymddangos y frydwyr a phoblwch y gallwn eu trydd yn dda i'n newid yw'r 3G, 4G, 4G, 5G, 5G, 10G, 5G. 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 33, 34. Mae'r bwm mattyfa o 17, mae'r bwm mattyfa o 17 o rhan, mae'r semw Llywodraeth, mae'n meddwl, mae'n meddwl o lawer o ddweud, neu ddysgu o ddweud o'r cyfnod, o'r cyfeirio cyfnod, oherwydd i'r cyfnod ddweud. Mae'n meddwl o'r cyfnod, mae'n 60. 60 o'r cyfnod o'r cyfnod, Felly we launch 8x8, 27th and 28th. Mae ddim yn 같아 Tiw i 사람 drwy 17th o my surgical, fwy яwne bwyn greenladau liliad yr adlitod a'r maen i éw. этих nid ymmyrchol wedi rh UX a'r cynyddu allu nhw mewn ll loc, ond we have been converted to watchwas there Felly os nesaf, yn yings trefwn y rosers, iawn i'n felly roi cofiad ar joinedievellog, i'r ddவng y ffordd, beth iddyn ni'n gawat입니다. Mae'n dwylo eu gwahanol i gwaith yng Nghymru. Mae'n s harmless hyd o'r cy Orlando. Felly ei dd� StartingWord company fel y deceived goes to�holŷtog, ond fel teimlo hunom. Felly, mae'n cyfnod o'r cynharag i fynd i'r cymdeithasol cynhyrchu amser yma. Felly, yn y cyfnod cyfrifodol rydw i'r cynhyrchu, nid oes yn y cyfrifodol i'r cynhyrchu. a chyd wedi unrhyw dechrau i fynd i gan y byd, nid maen nhw'n rhaid gyda'r 21nd yno. Ond rhaid gael i'r mynd yn ei wneud am y ddefu wedi llefyn, ddyn ni'n ddiddordeb mwy honno, i'w gwneud â'i bwyd yn ei fforddau i'w ddylinio oherwydd blwlad ddyn ni'n ddiddordeb, ac wrth gwrs, yn ddefu ddysgu'r byd yn ei ffwrdd â'i ddysgu'r byd o'i gwenedig Dyma yn rhan i'ch siarad hwn, oherwydd 1.221 h! Rydyn cael eiichi wedi bod yn gallu gwirionedd. Gwyrdraeth yn y pow佐or. Rydyn ni'n bwysig, ac yn maes bwysigio. Rydyn ni'n ymwysig i'r holl agorau am ddeud. Nid oedd i'n meddwl, ond mae'r ddweud hwn yn gwybod. Felly, rydyn ni wedi fod yn gwneud ar y holl honny, sydd ymwysig ei fod yn holl gwrthol yma. Rydyn, mae'n gwaith fydd o hyn yn weld i gael. Mae'r cyfrŷuwch ddweud hynny, Mae'n rhaid i gael i'r cwestiynau, yn adigau i'r ddweud i'r ddweud i'r ddweud. Mae'n gael i'r ddweud i'r ddweud i'r ddweud i'r ddweud i'r ddweud i'r ddweud i'r ddweud i'r ddweud, mae yna arweinydd i'r glas fath, y gyhoelio, ac i'r ddweud i'r rhywun i'r ddweud i'r cyfnod할. Yn ames pen yn brofiwr, ysbytu chi'n teimlo i'r ddweud i'r echystodau, a работать ANY given permission, and, therefore, stakes The Health Education Placespace and so on is much less consideration it would be technically a planning application for it. So, I shall continue to checked similar applications funded with providing authority, when I feel it's for housing, that it is not a real Knock-A-Tなんです process! Fel ychwanegais, fyddwn yn rhywbeth gyda roedd yn fathon yng Nghymru fel dweud yn y gallu cyflawn. Roeddwn yn ei wneud yn gyfliwch ar y cyflawn. Rydw i'n meddwl, mae'n fathodol yn adeg. Fel ychwanegais, wedi cael ei dod yn ôl ymwybod hyn ymweld. Roeddwn yn effeithio i chi'n cyflawn i'r cyflawn. Roeddwn yn edrych y ffaith ymlynig hefyd. Roeddwn yn y ffaith, wedi ar y ffaith dda, yn ddysgu chi ddweud yn y cyflawn. Mae'r rhwnghwyng ymdweithio bydd gynhaligiaeth, yn mynd yma, i gael wahanol, ac mae'r hwn ychwanegydd o'r llyfr oherwydd yn llywodau, ac mae'r rhwnghwyng wedi'u fath o'r Rhwynghwyngór Gwylfaenol, felly mae'r rhwnghwyng yn gweithio bwyd yeradau. Mae'r rhwnghwyng fel ymddangos unigfeydd hwn. Mae'r rhwnghwyng yn fath o bos whomwys, ac mae'n fath o'r rhwnghwyng, Ie ddim yn ymdweud y byddai'r ysgolwydd yma o'r Rhysleidion Cymru. A wedi'u gweithio'r gweithio yma, mae'n gwneud am y ddweud yn y ddechrau gyda'r cyhoeddfa. Mae rymau rymai ar y cyfnodau 30 ymlaeth mewn gwirionedd ac yw'r cwestiynau Cymru yw'r byw yn ymgylchedd, oherwydd i ddod o'r cyfromau a oedlau yn y nifer y mae'n fregylchedd, oherwydd i ddweud o'r cwestiynau sydd wedi eu cyfnodd o'r cyfromau sydd yn ei wneud. Mae'r cyfromau sydd yn ei wneud. Mae'r cyfromau sydd yn y cwestiynau cyfromau sydd yn y cwestiynau. Rhyw ar gweithio ystod yn gweithio bod gan ystod, ond y ffordd. Rhyw ar gweithio. Mae'n clyw i'r gwaith yw'r fettym, neu dy'r ffreddingol. Mae'r roedden i'w edrych yn rhoi bwysig, ac yn ffraff i ffraffio gyda chewyddu, oes ymgyrchu, gan ysgrifennu a oeddech chi'n oed i'n oed i'r cyffredinol rydyn nhw. Rwy'n ddechrau ei bod yn ddiffweithiau those, ond mae o'r ddweud yn ysgrifennu gwahanol yma. Rwy'n ddiffweithiau's yw'r ddweud yn ysgrifennu gwahanol eich fathau, mewn ddillективau'r rhaid ei bydd y gwaith. Hysbeth y wneud. Men. Cymru ar y cadw o pob grid. Er. Yw ychwaneg ddiddwi? Er... B greet eich hwn ei ddigon fo. Cymru ar y cadw o pob ychydig yn cyfrifio awr, ar y cwmbryd, erwg i'r cynllun cyfo. cofnodi i'n siwr i'r myfyrdd. Mae Governau sydd anodd o ffrifau ffarnigol, ond mae'rчin gael chi i atlau'r ffarnigol. I'r hyn oeddwn iaith nid oed ydyn nhw ffarnigol ffarnigol i'r umfyrdd y holl yma, ond fe'n myfyrdd o'r wych yn addysg. Yn yfa'r cyflydd ac ydych chi'r ddweud mewn hwnnw i amglygu hefyd. Roedd y gwir pan ownerydd. Felly, ydych chi'n mwynhau'n gwelwch ar gael y gwaith o'r ddweud i'r perilyng i'r ddwylo sydd wedi'u gweithio'n ei mwy o'r gweithio ar gyfer hyn yn ddiwyddiadol i'r llwyllau'r llwyll. Felly, mae'r ddweud i'r ddweud i'r ddwylo sydd i'r ddwylo sydd wedi'u gweithio ar gyfer hynny ychydig. Wel, chyfifio, yn cynnwys peicol o'r llwyddon. Mae'n gwahanol gyda'r olfodol. Aberthangol, Chyfifio. Curlyw, Llywodraeth Cymru yn ymwysigol, i'w gwych yn gyda cyflawni ganddingsaf, am gweithio eich gymrygau ynddyn ni. Yr ymddangol yma mor cyfïdd ymddangosol drwy'r ymddangol, yn gwyetiwch ymddangol, amdain oka'r ymddangolol yn gweithrwyng eu gwasanaeth. We've wished to wind the stove of the ground without its ambition. Up to £15,000 for projects made available through this present scheme prepared for £3,000 previously. A total of £1212.49 will be available through the scheme with a manual budget of £55,000 Mae'r ddechrau cymdeithasol yn olygu, a yn olygu y pethau, ac mae'n hyn yn gymryd, fel y ddechrau, yn ei bod yn olygu'r ddaeth, ac mae'r ddechrau cymdeithasol yn olygu'r ddechrau, ac mae'n olygu'r ddechrau, ac mae'n olygu'r ddaeth yn olygu'r ddaeth'n olygu'r ddaeth. i'w cyfnodd yr oes hyfforddiad, i'w clywed am arfer. Felly, mae'r ddwydio'r gwell-funtiad ddigonwys cyfrifol, mae'r ddwyf yn ddigonwys cyfrifol o gyfrifol o'r ddweud, oherwydd mae'r ddweud yn ddigonwys cyfrifol o'r ddweud, oherwydd mae'r ddweud yng nghyrch, oherwydd mae'r ddweud yn ddweud. Mae'r ddweud yn dweud, ac mae'n gweithio'n ddweud o'i ddweud yn dweud, I think I've explained the reason for it on the scene, uncontrollable to the end. Thank you, Chairman. Thank you, Chairman, in the light of the last, my answer will be simply no. Given that many members have worked on family commitments that made a certain day a bit possible for them, will the administration consider a more varied approach to time, for example not producing something on the same day, or consider providing recordings of those briefings for members to access? Thank you, Chairman. I'm very sorry that Council of Women has not attended two member groupings that we had. What do you consider? We thought that so to not make the morning session, but we felt that perhaps to reach to the evening session, as well as far as we thought it would go, we will take out another lesson. I'm sorry, I'm sorry Chairman, I'm making a lot of noise. How is the next approach in the research of hosts, says that, where we chose a little plan that hasn't been tried yet, is in fact on the first or two of the program. So yes, I'm using the comment that we have, but yes it's on the other side. We are preparing a new trajectory, and we are going to provide consultation in September, so we will do our best. Thank you. Could you give us some figures of what the number that we need to deliver next year is, and what we are doing? Thank you. Not as the current figure is still in effect in October. The new trajectory is based on the new plan guidelines, on receipt and work. It's already ongoing, so when we complete that work, I'll be able to deal with the current work that we're doing going forward. Thank you Chairman. I'm going to be reading and answering this off. The Shedway service plans, after purchase of a digital vehicle in the next financial year, and it's planned to have an electric waste relation with the operational minus sign. Is that something that you can answer? Thank you Chairman, I do. If we want to encourage drivers to convert to electric vehicles, we need to ensure that all new models incorporate electric vehicle charging points. I'm going to be assured that this council will do everything possible to encourage developers to do plan system, to ensure that electric vehicle charging point is included in every vehicle cost, I believe, around £100, whereas post-construction it will be in excess of £2,000. May I remind members of something that is supposed to arise from your original question or reply? I'm not sure this one qualifies, but if you would like to respond, you are very welcome. I would anticipate that we will do all we can to meet the end of the year strike. Thank you. Thank you Chairman. Thank you very much. Thank you Chair. Yes, the planning commission for most of the 2020 traffic routine arrangements, which makes that, which you can't have far more on the ground, and they will go towards not so hopefully not a sign for a number of new vehicles. However, we had a letter on it that some of the issues should be in post-construction projects, both through some nearby villages. However, in the last two years, as far as we know from the records, we are going to see three conflicts directly from residents. And for those two of them who continue to use the information box, who got it, or where it is that was provided, so may I ask you to the extent so to give us information directly because I want to be able to see the issues. I didn't need to. As a surgery with the local council I have recently, almost all the residents complain to us about HDVs, which they blame on more stuff. And in 2014, though I'm raising them to say HDVs, who are willing and can't possibly be delivering what they want, and what even their attitude is. And when I understand from the local council that himself he has fed up with the approach that the encouragement has taken. What are the issues that are important? And how can our residents have any confidence if the process is made to them by way of conditions attached to their planning decisions, when there are no staff around to monitor them on to the future's plans? I just wonder, do you go back to your stone originality or do you put these seven hands in place? It's no good sitting there and complaining about everything because what we do for the end of the team is those contractors and trying to have meetings with contractors and that's usually the best way to meet them. I said, if we don't get the reports into us there's something we can do about it. At the moment, what we're trying to do is organise the meeting together with the site developers, the members and the parish councils. Meeting schedule for 28th of August to go right through this tragic meeting management plan that is in this event. Here, we're going to be off and put in place potentially measures which include a logbook, advocates of every single site so that every lawyer that comes in has a lot of time to get their session number coming. Then we can have access to those logs if we receive more place. The second thing that I would like to ask you to do is potentially install CCTV at the end of the system site. It will involve money and it will resist especially if we ask for the CCTV to be remotely accessible to us or it's out of the chain. But even in time, and I still say this, residents who see violations should report directly to the officers here. What I'm planning to do is make sure that there is a dedicated email and hopefully a phone number that will be called. Thank you. A councillor. If you don't mind. I need to make this. I supported that council that I tried to ask this question on. Yet again. This follows the site swipes on the matter from 12 Conservative councillors by the last time they picked it. She had already intervened allegedly on behalf of the town council at the 28th June 2020 meeting. The committee chair paused that meeting. Officers investigated and gave council by attire the response that should be had indeed consulted with Adam Campbell, town council. Now let me demonstrate once and for all. The design code is a discharge of ownership. Not by an application. The town council a lot of members were also contacted by the design group originally submitted on the 20th of August 2018 and again on the 18th of November 2018. The current phase of the sun attended the town council meeting on the 20th of April 2019 and the 11th of June 2019. On the 29th of May 2019 the town council clerk attended the working tour of Campbell with the developers and writers to discuss the design code. At the town council meeting minutes of 11th June 2020 showed that they decided not to make any further comments and not to attend the committee's meeting on 12th. At the clerk was subsequently informed of deferral of that design code on the 20th of April 2018 of June 5, 10th. Now, planning guidance does not require us to consult with the town commissioners but recognise the importance of this to the town commissioners and the planning team had gone about and done to ensure it cannot have answered those concerns. Thank you. Thank you. Mr Chairman, and I believe that this service will be continued. Does the service of keeping the town council in the room? So, thank you. Thank you. I was just going to say the prime officer has always been in the room on some days and he is willing to answer your questions in life. So, thank you. Thank you. 154 properties were acquired from April 2018 to June 2019 and another street council is on time to achieve a portfolio of 500 by 2020. We see it being more than just a money-making machine and it is now requiring properties by a good quality, by a great accommodation for those new and working south of Canada. Does the service of keeping the town council in the room in the room? I was just going to ask how do you make any changes to where the street is acquiring? Thank you. I was just going to ask how do you make any changes to where the street is acquiring? Thank you. I am hoping to leave now the private properties to the area of work area to ensure that we provide good, private accommodation for those new and working south. Thank you. That includes questions and we will move on to the next slide. Remember that we have 10 motions on our agenda today and a general reminder that the maximum period of 30 minutes is allowed for each version to be secondly accommodated including amendments if any, and the expiry because of the period of date will cease to be the case and move with the original motion or if that has been amended the move of the amendment now all in a sense of motion will have the rights that are applied for the motion or amendments is put to the vote. I remind you that I would normally require a risk version of any amendment but unfortunately many of the versions before us today either are not appropriate to council because they should first be considered or entirely considered by another body generally the cabinet or they have unresolved issues for instance financial implications which would need to be clarified before we or cabinet can discuss them many of them have birth bodies. I shall therefore be moving that some of them are not considered today. Now I am aware that the last time I moved that a motion should be referred to somebody else I did allow the proposal to speak to the motion but I believe that there would special circumstances then and I do not regard that as a precedent. I shall therefore exercise my authority understanding order 13D which allows a motion without notice which is what I should do quotes to refer something to an appropriate body or individual. It passed, the matter shall stand immediately third and shall not be further considered at the meeting end quote. A is a version from council Sarah Johnston. As this motion may have resource implications I move that this motion be referred to cabinet for review and consideration in accordance with standing order 13D. Do I have a second? Thank you very much Chancellor Roberts. There is no debate to move to the verb straight way. The councillors agree that this should be referred to the cabinet. Thank you. All right, we will take a moment for the folks, thank you. Those in favour of referring of referring this motion to cabinet please press the green button. Those who do not refer this motion to the red button those who wish to say the yellow button. Has everybody answered? May we see results? 37th aversion in favour and in favour against this is therefore deterrent. I revert rather to cabinet. I indeed is a motion from council Alex Manion. As this motion may have resource implications I move that this motion be referred to cabinet for review and consideration in accordance with standing order 13D. Do I have a second? Thank you Chancellor Roberts. I assume you all wish to call the folks therefore I ask you when the system is ready. Thank you. Thank you. Let's ask a question of what reason do you use why for a case? What reason? There are several, including office time as well as I remember actually quite a few cases. Do you agree that this should be referred to cabinet? Thank you. Nice and see motion from council only corrects. Now I would apologise both to council of rights and to council of party who had submitted a substantially similar motion and I discussed with both of them that this should be referred to cabinet for review and consideration in accordance with standing order 13D. Do I have a second? Thank you very much. Do you wish to call the folks? Yes. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Yn Heart towards the vote Yea, we got to the vote then those who wish appointed them we cannot discuss this it was the organisations of the vote those who wish to defer this these press the green button those who do not wish to refer to cabinet please press the red button those who wish tocalled these press the Stewart Button As everyone wanted exercises and notes IZMD is a local from council of keeping the soil, I'm happy to inform you that there isn't going to be very many resources that they should be able to do. Council of the soil, would you please, Professor? This is sadly the sort of motion that I can take no pleasure in. But the funding crisis in our schools has become too acute for any elected representatives of our communities to sit on sidelines and do nothing. As I'm sure every member is aware, energy schools have been relatively underfunded for some considerable time. And it's fair to say that many of us have been campaigning for some considerable time to rectify that situation. Lobbying our MPs and urging changes to the national funding formula that is being our schools and our people's message. Alas, our MPs haven't been successful. And over the last four years the situation has worsened to such an extent that head teachers have been forced into decisions that no school leader should be forced to make. Our teachers are taking on responsibilities far beyond teaching. And parents are being asked to contribute to running costs. Not luxuries, basic running costs for our schools. We all talk to the schools in our homes. We all know the stories. It started with cutting specialist teaching, placing extra workload on other teachers. And then teaching assistant hours are cut. Reducing support particularly for those children with special educational needs. And the day of class teaching assistants are long gone in most of our schools. And then most recently teacher and head teacher hours have been cut. Often now with teaching assistants being asked to step up and take classes. Third reducing support available for those with extra in need of extra support. And as I noted in the motion, this is a crisis where we see some of our schools receive full board going down to a four and a half day week. And classes being cut so that we have vastly different aid groups being brought together. Meanwhile other parts of the school budgets have long since been cut to the bone. Teachers and parents and PTAs have been asked to step in to cover a shortfall in maintenance and cleaning both practically and in terms of budget. How many stories have we all heard that teachers are making purchases for their pupils? It's simply not right. Now the Government likes to trumpet that our schools have never had so much money. That her pupil funding has increased. But chair, this is simply not the case. For many of our schools cuts to lots on funding are nowhere near covered by the increase in perth-level funding. And it's indeed not the real rises in costs to schools. Some of which have been mandated by the Government. Teachers pay national insurance contributions, pension contributions and the apprenticeship money. And at the same time we have deep cuts at the council council level that have had an impact on what the local authority can provide for special education on the income school improvements. Chair, school funding is not a direct responsibility of this council. But this council does have a responsibility to standard for the residents of this district on matters which affect them. And what could be more important than representing low-represent residents that don't have a voice in the democratic process, the pupils of our schools? Just this week I received a newsletter from my son's school. In it there is for us the lobby of their district councillors as well as their MPs and councillors on the issue of school funding. In the crisis we have averaged is everyone's responsibility to bring whatever authority we have to bear to lobby the Government for change on this. So I hope that all members come back to this motion. Thank you. Thank you councillor, to stop on the other side. Councillor Rippert. Councillor Rippert, may we speak? Yes. Please support the Council of Local Social Information as schools have reached a crisis point where the budgets have been cut to the bone and continue to chip away. Both secondary and primary schools have cornerstones of our communities and their health, financial situation, affects each community as a whole. The Colisey's District and the Country have had a devastating impact. Schools are more and more reliant on parental donations, although it has been paid for through taxation and through the efforts of PTAs to put on the banks. Please support the Government on the legs, the PTAs, the very important levels of austerity in different communities. So those, as I've thought, tend to travel the most. Many of us here in this Chamber have probably attended and helped out of school fairs over the past few weeks. Wedi gyda'r cwylio y maen nhw i gydag i ysgol yma i g sniperant. Mae bwysig y tro wedi gwybod i gydag i'ch sefynau a chydag i'ch bod yn tot Hydro Cymru yn ffordd i ysgolührt, Felly, mae'n ddweud'r blwyddyn i'r ddweud, y ffordd o'i gwneud i'r ffordd o'i gwrthymau a daith yn hynny'n cymhysgfaith. A gwrthodd yr unrhyw diwg i'n gweithio yma yma, ond mae'n rhaid i'n ddweud i'r ddweud i'r rai'r ddeud. Rydw i'n dod i'r edrych yn y ddwy i'r gofod o'r ysgol yn nhw'n 20 oed. A oeddi'r cyhoedd yma, rydw i'n gweithio i'n ddweud i'r gweithio i'r ysgol. I decided to leave a few years ago for giving my own mental and physical health. I felt I could no longer deliver the books and comprehensive education that each child deserves, but the resources available and one of those is time. I think he did not have time for my own three children and to support them as they navigate the way through school and life. I know I'm not alone in this. There is a recruitment and retention crisis in teaching. The most recent figures published on the 1st of July 2019 from the DLA revealed that 40% of those who are in the profession are under age 35 and that almost a third of the teachers who are in the variety of quality of life are back all time. The fractions have adjusted too much. As alluded to earlier, I've been in the comprehensive education for all children for when they start when they leave formal education. The model needs to remain inclusive and inspirational. And that's the variation currently that many schools are finding more and more challenging. Due to the sources being tied, the focus is on the core subjects with very little left and more creative subjects, often known for the less academic people's pride. For special education reasons and disabilities, schools have to find the first 6,000 with the county house clocking at the remainder for each education healthcare plan. Naturally, there's one that's been in shortfall and funding increases from central government since 2015. I'll summarise a bit more. I've taken time gone. So I'm standing here in this town to change it today. I feel deserve the responsibility to hold the governance of countyness and fight for the future of our schools and communities. So I put this to this council to support this motion. Thank you. I'm close to this because the Cornwall fighting school is a school in which it's had to decide to impose a school on Wednesday afternoons from a new school year with considerable impact on parents and guardians and children as well as obviously their education. Did you ask the local government association a few weeks back said that, to its knowledge, around about 250 final schools in the country so far have taken the decision to reduce their schooling hours because of the shortage of funds. I find it very disappointing that the NPD for Southlands temperature is afraid it actually doesn't appreciate the actual rising costs that the government has thought the schools through. So only is it a case of general inflation. They've also had to put up and increase pensions, and increase salaries. They've also had to put up the apprenticeship tax. And also they have seen reduction in pupil premium because of the result of universal credit. Universal credit has had an impact on parents applying for free school meals which obviously then has an impact on the pupil premium because the pupil premium depends upon the number of pupils that have free school meals. So all these government policies have had an impact on school funds and the same that schools have had an adequate funding. In fact, school funding has been increased by, I think, 3.8%. It's to show now how to touch the government is with the right of the state schools. I find it incredible that here we are at this day and age that my local state primary school has reduced its hours to four and a half days a week with an independent purse as five and a half days a week for its students. Immediately pushing students to go to state schools at a disadvantage to those whose parents can afford to send them to the independent school. It's a disgraceful situation. And the government should be ashamed of themselves. And I find it quite incredible that, you know, the party obviously has so far kept really silent on this crisis that's happening in our schools. Y Llywbeth Cymru. Y Llywbeth Cymru. Y Llywbeth Cymru. Y Llywbeth Cymru. Y Llywbeth Cymru. Y Llywbeth Cymru. Y Llywbeth Cymru. Y Llywbeth Cymru. Y Llywbeth Cymru. Y ll Wrtyff maen nhw smiles y bulun. Y fregyань. Y Llywbeth Cymru. Y Llywbeth Cymru. I don't want to see teachers have to make these sort of decisions that are really affecting children in our district. I want the government to listen to the recommendations that are made in this motion on the strike. I would like to explain the amendments that I made that are small and they are mild to the tone of this letter that will be written so that it is accepted by the government. Morg is thinking that MPs in this area have different colours or no colours at all and have worked really hard to try and push the government into providing more funding. I think they do appreciate the difficulties that schools are having in this area. I know MPs in this area had a meeting with 10 teachers in Westminster last week to follow up their concerns with the Education Minister. I'm not trying to dilute this motion or the letter that was sent. In some ways I think the amendment to take action during the next meeting will be straight to the tip because I want to see what should be taken sooner up and later. My hope is that it is acceptable as a mild amendment to this motion. Thank you. Thank you. Do you have a second? Do you wish to speak now? Just to be clear, this is a problem on your face and unfortunately my daughter wants statistics to get a quote for those who need special support. So it is something that does not matter what political party you are in this room to describe the comments that have been made, we all care about. Is this to seek to strengthen it? Is it also to seek to have more acceptance and to have more of a chance because this needs to happen, we need fair funding, we agree with that. We want to support contrary to what was said. The amendment would have more of a chance if the language was covered and that's what we're seeking to do that's strengthening it on a time scale because otherwise it's a danger that it won't get to speak to. We are now discussing whether or not to accept this amendment. I have noted several speakers down and I'm not sure which they were wishing to speak for so we will start again. Are there people who wish to speak to this amendment? Thank you councillor Paul King. Thank you chair. Just going through this quickly. I think the point being made about the first few minutes of sensitive comments here may be that they haven't struggled to fear, they have not struggled, they have just had enough to follow here. So in my view the struggle too should be legal, that's my point. The next change which says that the third law in that paragraph, those issues may need to keep on this intention. But the orate has led to a license in the teaching profession, which is confirmed by the next point that says that it's 100,000 years' accretionals are going to go to the law. So I really don't see the point of that second set of changes. However, the last one that's going to take action really next is going to be here. I think it's there. Thank you. Councillor Robertson, do you wish to speak to the amendment or to the amendment? At this moment in time I'm not sure why I wanted to speak. Can I stand up and you'll sit down if I'm... Yeah, I'll stand up. I'm going to get on to my... You are speaking only as to whether we accept this amendment or not. Otherwise, wait until the amendment has been voted on and then you can have your own story. Thank you chair. So I'll speak to the amendment. I'm not happy with the amendment, I'm not happy with the original. I think the reason being, and this is speaking to the amendment, which is basically supported, is... All we're doing here is virtue signaling. We can't do anything about education. We can write as many letters to these people and we can be either rude to them or we can be lettered to them. It's not going to make an IO to a difference and I actually find, as a councillor, 30 years coming, it's quite insulting for lots of new councillors to come here, try to put these sort of motions that are absolutely... I'm not going to speak to the amendment. So in my opinion, you are virtue signaling and really the amendment is no better than that as well because it's going along with a principle that we shouldn't be going on with. Education is nothing to do with South Cambridge and District Council. I have five grandchildren, three of whom are in primary state education in Cambridge. So I have got as much interest in... I'm not going to speak into the motion. If you only wish to speak to the motion, will you sit down there before the amendment? It must be voting for the motion. I think the motion should be for a hand. The amendment. Councillor Delfty, would you wish to speak to the amendment to the motion? That's the motion. Thank you. Councillor Delfty. The amendment. I think the best amendment, I would be happy with this, is that the problem isn't just about this government. Our very problem is undoubtedly the worst of the moment. So I wouldn't want to... The last amendment I think is actually very sensible. The specific... Do you get to the spending move, if you rather than one-off things, one-off additional funding, I think it would help to sustainability of any additional funding. I'm afraid I'll open to the second amendment. The difficulty is even now. It is a crisis now, I think we are addressing. I don't know if we could... Come to the mic. Thank you, gentlemen. So, just to begin, just to say that I acknowledge what Councillor Rivlett was saying, and we all have some teacher difficulties in schools. Nobody wants such a... Nobody wants... Nobody wants to argue for lower funding for their schools. But I think the reason for this amendment is really to ask, what is the purpose of this motion? Is it, as it seems to be, to actually get higher funding for our schools? Or is it a piece of... So, the reason we've got this motion thrown at this amendment forward, is really just to emotionally tone down some of the language. Now, one of the principles of asking somebody for money is that if you criticise the money, you call them a failure, you're less likely to get the money. So, clear? So, you're talking about the... No, I'm talking about the... Talking about the... Use of words like failure and crisis today. If you want to raise extra money and that's what we all want for our children, then we need to phrase our motion in such a way that does not insult the government. Now, as other speakers mentioned, this is an issue that goes back through many months. Conservatives have been in power since 2010, and as you all know, that was in the coalition with the Liberal Democrats for five of those nine years. So, actually, it's as much your responsibility as it has ours. So, really, it's not my responsibility at all to remember your words in the chair. I apologise if I'm using it in the chair. So, the point is, if we really want to get extra funding for our schools, extra funding for our children's education, then the best way we can build out that is by phrasing our motion in such a way that it acknowledges that many governments have been responsible for the public situation that we have, that one of the biggest problems we have is that because we're a rural area, we're not seeing as being as important to the country as other countries. And that if we want this money, we need to ask for it. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. This will tend to the issue against the line path. So, the others that you found was difficult. I had to make a note about it. The issue that certain members of the room have had difficulty with, can I suggest that we keep success to the people who are in the community and can I suggest that we keep successive governments, change trouble tune to have not fairly funded, and then where it is made to process their own difficulties and retention, we keep the same review. We all... Would you like to apply the written... I would rather... I would rather do another discussion because the scene is a bit... So, what you wish now is, in the second paragraph, that excessive governments have not fairly funded schools in the fourth paragraph... In the fourth paragraph, the third line will agree, health issues comma, many... Adjustments. I would like to pass this. Years of real term pay cuts to teachers, et cetera, et cetera, there are difficulties, and we are afraid of grammatically that it will go away. We can wait and work around. I will ask if you are going to go to school for the amendment. I will ask councillor John when he used to speak. Again, there are points out, there are not five minutes then for the whole... It would be up to you to know what amendment we are now making. We are trying to establish what is the arrangement for those of that amendment. I can't really speak then to the amendment way. I don't know that. So, I'll speak. Thank you. Members, I'm hoping we can get an amendment that comes in a solid reason. In this case, we will go straight from the very beginning of how the amendment is made. And I take it that there are very few that oppose in general the purpose of this version, so I think it's worth doing this. So, can we get some sort of a little word for the amendment to be done? Members, we have an agreed amendment agreed by the proposer and therefore we do not need to discuss it. The second paragraph now says, believes that successive governments have not fairly funded schools called up, which is jeopardising the education, etc. In the other amendment, the years of rules are termed, they trust the teachers, etc. have led to difficulties in retention and recruiting and we keep take action during the next spending period. Is everyone clear what the motion is now? Thank you. We have one and a half minutes for further debate and by the council, Lord Williams, under the amendment, council of Lord Williams, Hunt and Hart, if you only wish to say this as a drawing with an idea, why I suggest that you wave your right to do so, if anyone has a particular detail point that I'm happy to come so far. Well, it's a point of order, really. The action nearly rises to the bullet points but it needs a proposition at the end, so I think you will have two. Thank you. The action and the spending review, too. OK. Thank you. Councilor. Councilor. Thank you, General. What I was going to suggest was that instead of writing a letter which is going to disappear into an entry in Whitehall, that we can't start with what they can do to help our primary sector schools. We do have things in ways that we can help them but that would be really effective to have to cancel how we can help our schools to fund it. Thank you. I'm afraid we're out of time. We cannot then discuss that. Councilor. You'll have the right to speak now. If there's anything that you wish to say otherwise we'll go directly to the vote. Maybe just a couple of things but I'll be very quick. Just with the council rights suggestion we've maybe seen quite a few motions that they've been keeps coming so I'm glad that this one isn't one of them but maybe there's something coming that will occur to take up. To speak to the question of the council laws I'm sorry I wouldn't do that I know that there isn't I know that there isn't a direct responsibility I'm a party and I think many members of this council feel that's letting our weight to efforts to persuade people that they do have responsibility for this situation these are worth more activity at this point and so I hope that this council will apply for motion. Thank you very much. Since I know that there is at least one member of first of it I think we should go to an electronic vote so if you approve the motion will you press the green button if the motion has amended thank you very much press the green button if you wish to oppose it the red button if you wish to abstain the yellow button as everybody goes we assume thank you the 37 in favour and one obsession thank you the motion therefore is we come now to the motion from councillor David Clayton as this motion may now be referred to the cabinet for review and consideration in accordance with standing order 13 do I have a second thank you very much for that part councillor does councillor agree with the city cabinet thank you the motion from councillor Edward Williams has been the form for further consideration we come now to the motion from councillor Mark Cowell Isaac Healy article 15 constitution provides changes to the constitution will only be approved by the front council after consideration proposed by the chief executive I therefore propose that this motion should be referred to the constitutional review that's more finished group from consideration as part of its general review of the constitution and in correct major accommodation to the city's affairs committee and to council do I have a second for that please councillor does the council agree to refer this to the constitution and review item 8 councillor has informed that he wishes to refer this motion as we feel it needs more work to explore the potential implications and I would rate the motion to be in accordance with the operation I motion from councillor councillor talking would you please refer this motion and may I use up a little bit of my time to congratulate councillor for passing your grammatical legal and metaphysical challenges getting this motion accepted so a couple of a couple of meetings in the last few weeks have made me think and genuinely think quite seriously about a local plan and I was actually very pleased to enjoy the all member discussion about what are the aspirations for the local plan we were slightly distracted on my table because councillor Ryan and councillor can't have a sort of discussion about bananas and whether we should be importing bananas because apparently they take away the soil fertility in South America but I think that again despite the the main discussion was good around what is it that this council wants from its local plan and there was an old reason that I attend I think you go to the budget and this was shared by councillor Haynes and the discussion there was about carbon neutrality carbon neutrality sustainability and particularly the burdens that developed in place on meeting the aspirations of carbon neutrality and again it seems to me that there was an attempt by this council I give this administration to try and shape a local plan that had some aspirations beyond where are we going to put the houses so it seems to me that at the same time we have great members' partnership coming along with something and saying well we're going to put a large amount of concrete there a large amount of concrete there now I'm not saying in this motion that that should never happen that they need to carry on to the future but what I am saying is that as this council is investing all effort from us and our offices to shape the local plan that we should be clear with the great members' partnership councillor Haynes and make that clear to be clear that we will not entertain these propositions until and unless we have ourselves satisfied to our own expectations what sustain those teams what building teams and they will have to wait for their aspirations now that is the long and the short of this motion and therefore I invite council to the room Thank you do you have a second Thank you I'll speak at the end if I mention I'll speak at the end if I mention I'll speak at the end if I mention Are there any other speakers Thank you Absolutely Thank you So if you can ask me one more time last year the Conservative group supported the motion for our district of carbon neutral by 2050 and we are very pleased to see that the national government has followed this council's lead in making promises to the whole country to the government but I think we need to Yes, we all believe in sportive environment but we have to talk and in my mind there is an enormous amount of concern about carbon rights a lot of natives are here there is an enormous amount of concern about the busway down and we don't want to see countryside buzz over and concrete failure and I think now that we have council agreed to have this very lofty goal of being carbon neutral by 2050 I think what we need to do is actually think very carefully about what that means and put it in place and not to immediately jump up and start putting carparks everywhere on the concrete concrete dump site we need to actually think carefully about how it is that we are going to actually meet this time so that's why I support council's work I'm glad to hear council why you are saying that we should think about how we can raise this zero carbon target that we are trying to meet and that we don't want to see countryside concrete failure and we will be caught so yes that should be the question of lateral say it's exactly the same thing why do you consider this one to complete or not to complete itself and if I can't finish to give what it is going to is to remove the agreement I'm really going to say that in the countryside chain and yes you went ahead now remember this when you put the ground together the only transport solution for that corridor also very much counted I've pointed to public transport aka cannot be given possible not like that just that one is a public transport possible the main thing I think here is that this option in some ways is going to tie our next local plan the work we are doing for that to the work that is being done to deliver your local plan so we cannot try to work on new local plan to the work that was done for the figures of local plan to deliver your infrastructure now I think because of this motion has forgotten that the city bill was created to provide funding to deliver infrastructure because the government identified better language as a group and that funding is meant to deliver infrastructure so trying to tie the hands of our representatives to speak I think it is a good interpretation which we should really do and I think in this way we will be generalising the delivery of the very plan that you put together and therefore I will most want to do it to make it possible to tie the hands of any member in their decisions over what is coming in their presentation and in that otherwise as you are saying you will be able to do that not only in my the legislative resolution I would be minded to support the council on this motion except for the two that I have mentioned it is very important to me my residents that any development that goes on in parliament is next to the environmental impact that that has to the residents of autumn I have been working with the council to look at how the air quality monitoring puts along the A10 so that is the development on monitoring of the air quality and the impact of any the future developments along the A10 to the air quality and the residents of autumn if a motion was put forward that said this council will work to develop things where air quality monitoring does not have a plan to support but can't support some of the needs a future level plan and if we return an issue to the council on the way thank you very much there are a number of residents so the problem with this is that the representatives of the GCP and also to undermine the consensus that the GCP has built on that this council including many members here adopts it so this doesn't have any concerns except for the court so the first member of this motion would be to undermine the local plan and reverse back the situation we were in a year ago before we had on the local plan and in fact it has been more complicated to know about the countryside than this current plan has and that has been stated what is the important part of life and what the CEMP is dealing with providing the transport that is needed for the CEMP for the housing that is put out on the green belt as the development of the CEMP which is in the local plan but over the last 20 years of development the nobody has given enough thought to have and get from there and now getting to that point of crisis where as more businesses come to the CEMP there is a way of getting people there and then Mark and Ryan which we make is not just a window dressing now for the travel power because it does have to be part of something more part of a bigger plan a bigger strategy still be the issue to make CEMP useful and sustainable and it is possible to produce conditions and it is possible to practice to make actual travel that is a factor of the world taking this into consideration because the CEMP plan is the whole of the CEMP area and that is the only way you can make any real changes but I think it is different Thank you It is not going to come to surprise CEMP that I am going to turn to it it is slightly different to how I was spoken I see this as a cause and until it does say so far as they relate to travel but it is not asking for the next local plan to have them in place just the administration surely has their requirement to present we share them and it seems in my view to make sense that such a big decision that is going to be made for such an area should take into consideration the environmental impacts I do not give it a predetermination because there is nothing in here to say how our representative should or shouldn't feel about the proposal or even the opinion it is just asking for a force until we are really clear of the environmental situation and I feel perhaps more has been interpreted into it than perhaps than it actually is and I do have faith in our representative on reducing the pain to negotiate the predetermination that all of us do in these situations and I am sure you will do your job well with this order pass Thank you very much Constantly Thank you Chairman I believe more now that this represents a predetermination I think the predetermination that we have for was actually presented by the Deputy Leader who has all intents and purposes confirmed that there will be a 2200 vehicle parking on my side at Halstead and I believe that if we are to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050 that the cause should be taken whilst we fully understand how we need to drive this forward the deal to deliver infrastructure is a green that has been set up by what was the city deal and we have taken over by the Greater Coimbrish Partnership has led to a number of plans being put forward and I am afraid that so far the forwards objections of residents have last year been in my view ignored so I do believe that we really need to put that foot down and suggest to the Greater Coimbrish Partnership that the residents of South Coimbrish ship will be listening to and with that Chairman I will set the second motion Thank you very much I believe that there will be no more speakers if I tell them which to speak we will have a chance to close a bit Chair, I want to close the matter Very well Can we take that to a set please? Thank you Chairman I hope I don't take too much time If this matter of predetermination of binding the representative is a stopper to this then I am entirely content to remove the first line of this motion If someone comes to me in the last couple of days and says you have got it wrong I would be delighted to look at that sort of discussion I am very happy to say something along the lines specifically to say that until this council has completed and published the success of the environmental requirements and conditions of the next row of the plan so promise that they now have all the options that council is opposed to any further work of bringing forward the proposals for a problem I ask and I believe and I look to the audience to learn across that that is not predetermination I will pass Chairman It was my opinion actually that the motion passed with all my right to predetermination because when you stop something to do something it doesn't mean that it doesn't want to do it but I think that there is a case of a planning case where a leader I believe has started to go to a particular way in a planning case and what Doug said now is that there is no evidence to demonstrate the members' back stack and I would see predetermination as an issue within the motion itself that prior to the motion would need to be amended to a plan not there because there is nothing to say that when you represent the council to the committee he will indeed follow that structure so that's my opinion Thank you in the light of that motion is your position to speak and then move on Thank you So we just remind ourselves what the purpose of the City Deal was The City Deal was there, half a billion pounds was there to deliver on the local plans without the City Deal there was no mechanism to deliver the infrastructure to support these new communities being built as truly sustainable communities and if the City Deal had fallen actually I don't think our local plan would have been adopted because there was no transport strategy to deliver on the infrastructure Let's also not forget that an application to push proper rights anywhere is a planning application and therefore I believe this one will go through JDCC so it's not a done deal but a proper planning process and that will take into consideration all the environmental impacts and everything else associated with it to remind you that prior to May of last year the GCP was not really talking about environmental issues at all I think they were writing my best form in assembly but it was not a big issue for GCP since then the issue of environmental sustainability of air quality of biodiversity has risen far higher up the agenda and the awareness of GCP so we're talking about a different body today to the body that was there 14-15 months ago and so I'm therefore confident that GCP will not be delivering anything but it's not built that high the subtle thing that will be accommodated within the new emergency that was in place that's a team naggy by now it's been painfully swelled if we put a pause in place we will run to a complete halt and conversations I have with businesses is that we are representative on GCP to make sure that portions are taken into full consideration in any developments that happen as a result of the city day on Monday I have had no further speakers but I have not noticed the leaders they have done there that's why I am as Chancellor Chairman to begin to wind up the debate I should ask now Councillor Toppe to wind up the debate and we should go to the vote I apologize to those of you who make signal to your wish to vote you should go to Councillor Toppe Thank you chair I shall be very brief but I am grateful to the support fund Councillor Bion it's always great to have a support fund unexpected source to go here thank you for that this is a matter of thought which is a tale Thank you we shall now move to the vote the version is for you unalented if you wish to approve the motion you will press the green button thank you look at the speakers beforehand and if I saw no hands until the debate about the amendment I am sorry Councillor it's a factual question it's a point of information I will allow you to speak it's a lot of use for my colleagues there are no proposals for a partner over the past the motion makes no sense I think we'll say if you wish to vote for this you will press the green button if you wish to oppose it you will press the red button if you wish to stay you will press the yellow button has everybody voted many see the result both have voted for it at 26 against therefore the motion item J is a motion from Councillor de Behalen this motion has a number of indications and in particular it refers to the council making sure that something happens in a forthcoming SDD that is a policy issue which should be covered I therefore propose that this motion be deferred to be referred to cabinet for its consideration in accordance with standing order 13D do I have a second? right in that case may I remind members that this is an issue which is beyond our capability to decide and will in any context have to go to cabinet for approval I can't say anything as we mentioned this council recognise climate emergency and I think all we have to do is recognise that it's a climate and ecological emergency so in many of the first ever global scientific assessment of biodiversity and habitat loss showed unprecedented and dangerous decline of species and habitat over 40% in terms of insects and pollinators in Europe closer to home we have this habitat mapping by the biodiversity partnership project that shows that in Cambridge and Peterborough it confirmed that Cambridge and Peterborough is one of the poorest for biodiversity tree cover and habitat and the South Cambridge the lowest amount of area under management for nature was the more urgent of nature we are a growth area with unprecedented investment in our village and at the same time therefore we need to make sure that we embed nature conservation protection within our planning system last week the youth eco council came here a group of between 81 years old to speak to our community and they shared their concerns and fears about climate change about the environment and they said to decision makers here in the council they think we are not taking enough notice that there is inharmony between homes and businesses and the environment for authority and as a council we can decide that through our planning system which is ongoing at the moment we do improve nature by embedding biodiversity net gain in the development and we can do that in the preparation of our next joint global plan there are implications in this motion and I have spoken to all senior climate activists who are involved in this, both here in the city and in the shared planning service and they see their form as feasible the things that they are working on and therefore chair asks this council that you support this motion as is there is talk about doubling GVA in our area let's double nature at the same time and let's allow nature to thrive as well as people and businesses so I'm obviously very happy for this leading the way in South Cambridge and people are looking nationally at us the fact that I can give a visible leadership with the new Yorkshire Cange Arc on the environment as a reflection of the faith that people from the top of the tree down to our humble bed have placed in us and we have a real ambition to council here to roll out best practice and innovation and now the new environment working groups roll is going to be to hold the other work streams which are productivity connectivity and place making hold them all to account make sure that environmental issues don't fall down the list of their priorities that they are always at the top and that we take every opportunity to grab innovation best practice all the new emerging ways of ensuring that we lead this world leads our amateur in a better condition than when we arrived here for those of you of my age who have brought up during cold war you will remember the cland that the cold war hung over us however it was a threat it was always there I remember my father talking about it in a bunker in our garden to me the threat was very similar to the threat that I felt during cold war this is something that would potentially destroy my world destroy my children's world destroy your world as well something that has to be dealt with and we have enormous opportunity here in our whole world in district council to actually lead the way hold people to account not to assimilate the motion from council to solar about education isn't our responsibility but it doesn't need because we don't have the money to deal with it we should disregard it we don't have all the tools at our hands to sort out climate change but our voice will make difference and that's why I'm very excited by what we're doing for our local plan but actually it's not just about our local plan what we are doing is being looked at by ministers by senior civil servants we have a real opportunity here to put South Hampshire all political parties involved we know this is not about about political parties this is about all this initiative we care deeply about South Hampshire care about all our residents in Libya care about the air quality that our young people and our old people are suffering to resolve the problem so there's only lots to work with I'm deeply grateful to work for the climate environment committee have done across party committee they are really leading leading the way and when I talk to other councils they are picking up our example and setting up similar committees of their own so I'm very happy to support this I trust that there will be cross council support for all this because this is about doing the right thing and about us all making South Hampshire really the best placement to within because it will be green and it will be clean and the impact of our health and well-being and that of our children will benefit as a result and the burden of health and social care will be reduced consequently because it's all tick-off because it starts out in the centre thank you very much thank you for going over there as if there was anyone who wishes to speak against this motion thank you in that case there's great information rather than all of us saying what a vulnerable thing this is and wasting all our time Councillor Roberts sorry, Chairman I can't oblige because thinking of the last discussion that we had, last motion this seems to be to what we were arguing I'm sorry to have to stand against excellent and I know that she's very knowledgeable about what she's written here and she wasn't as long and I wish you could get to come to a few paragraphs if you could do a motion on what you used to do however that the Liberal Democrats in ambitions and regions which passed a bit over most wars in this building nowadays they don't seem to understand it seems about agreeing of pleasant land and cargo of the mutual and all this thing here it's very quite impossible while you keep churning out that you want to see the expansion the growth the economic viability our Cambridge the two with each other the more that this city grows the more that we allow it to grow and don't challenge the horrendous numbers of houses and businesses that we are told we must take dreams about your ecological glory floral formula is that we've just been discussing we're intending to lay on that, must be built we must have more parking for all these cars that will be required for all these extra people who were encouraging to come in from everywhere the question is I often have a lot of good time with each other but you know, I'm sorry Bridget girls' dreams of Cambridge and what we are going to do are actually most residents nightmares there was a piece in the paper that kept you in the news in a box done to hear the people and help to bring it to the old city of Boston and what brings the fear of what we did to build the cities and what brings the fear of what we did to that city of Boston and what brings the fear of what we did so it's not going Geto arniwch pellwch, nes yw'n gallu llwylion hwylio chyfnodd ac mae hynny'n fwy pwysig. Nid oedd ni'n gwych, mae'n gwych eisda'n fwy chamelu. A oedd y rhan o'r gweithdoedd wedi ddod yn y brygbws hwylu. Llywodraeth tyethau yn fwy o hynny'n gwneud ans yw'r cyfnodd ei choffaeth ac mae chathodd yma eich bod ni wneud i wneud i gael y cyfnodd yma, ac mae eich cyfnodd i'r rhain. Mae'r ystafell y maen nhw'n ei gweithio ar gyfer ar gyfer hynny'n gyfaint, ond mae ydych chi'n rhaid i'r ddod o gweld a chyfodol i'r ddod o ddod. Felly, rydyn ni'n gweithio'n gweithio, mae'n ysgrifftiau ar gweithio'r gweithio. Gweithio'r gweithio a chyfodol i'r cyfrifio'r ddod o gweithio a gweithio'r edrych ar gyfer ar gyfer... Ac oedd yn gwneud o'r cyfrifio cyfrifio gyfrifio ar gyfer y cael ei ddod o gyfrifio ychydig, a'r ysgolwg yn ymwneud o'r llyfr yng nghymru i ymwneud y Llyfr, oherwydd y gwaith yw'r ddefnyddio yma, yn ymwneud o'r ysgolwg yma, o'r ysgolwg ymwneud o'r llyfr yw'r hynny. Yn ymwneud o'r ysgolwg, ddweud o'r ysgolwg ymwneud o'r llyfr? Yn ymwneud o'r ysgolwg, As I remind colleagues and friends of mine who are opposed to saving the environment that if the world's ice caps melt, most of the south end of the chair will be at least 50 metres below the north end, so we all have a vested interest in making sure that we're here for the environment. It's very important for an opposition not to just oppose things for opposition's sake, and so we as a group have taken the view that when the administration has the right thing, it will support you. If you ask your minds back about a decade ago, when the turbine group were using the blue bin system, and when it was opposed by a new development that was being voiced tonight, we're very pleased to see that a new development group has actually followed different derivatives into the importance of the environment. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, chair. I just really want to respond to Councillor Wobbett's comments, particularly the ones about the asset growth, which I find to be huge. I just want to heart back to a planning committee where we were asked to consider some terms of the new council role that is ward, where she wished up the government residents to be not supported under the charging operation. I'm just saying that we've tried to be co-calming with each other, and it also echoes what Councillor Wobbett is talking about. Are you talking about order, ladies? Order, ladies, and you continue to work your way. Oh, yes. That's not very general. Councillor Wobbett, will you be quiet, please? I'm just going to ask for you to continue to work your way. This is that. I'm not saying that. I'm just saying that if you want to, if you genuinely want our district to stay clean, you have to find a balance for all these completely different off-against-you colours. So what Councillor Wright said about us being a breadbasket, I actually think it's much more New Yorks than that. I think there isn't this pressure of funding trees up all over the place and having a problem with that. I think it's a genuinely exciting time for us to actually drive forward biodiversity, and it's actually, I'm not speaking with any kind of self-interest here. I think I'll be the first person to put my hands up and say that farming is not actually a very biodiverse operation, and we do need to be challenged on that. And I think that there are better ways of doing this while still managing to feed ourselves and the population. So all I'm saying is about to report this motion today and I'm important to having us on road conversation. Thank you for that question. Chair, come on out first this way. No, you may not. I will in a minute. I will in a minute. Thank you. On these matters, I think no-one will ever speak to fashion leaders because it has to pay them to us. So I won't note on the details. I would like to ask for a bit of liability on these matters. I won't leave for Christchill. I won't go for both war and environmental issues and not the other. No-one will understand your custodians, as has been said, while children and grandchildren, you know what will happen. But we look right to the inconsistency and this is not, this should not be a physical matter if it wants to be taken seriously by the outside world. It should be seen as everybody on their own merits and should be advertised as so. Thank you. Thank you, Chair. I came back to a couple of others at the heart of our clients. I was there to see the employment policy. I mean, we have here a desire to ensure that there is a never-on-versing act to build upon it. Can you try to keep personal remarks out of this today? I'm sorry, it wasn't coming today. Okay. I've recognised the conflict between the thing, that carpark, carpark, carpark, carpark on dry, which has its own environmental goals in terms of reduction, carpark upside and vertical unions. We might as well just be able to give us the tools and we're about to make sure that if we lose an acre of firewood as land or have any acres of carpark, it is recovered. So I do not see it as any conflict. That's why I'm here to support this work. Thank you. Thank you very much. I want to challenge the idea that economic development and the Biography of the Sea Games are in that festival. I absolutely agree with that. The work of the Councillor Haynes has done has been a brilliant excellence in this regard. I'm very pleased to see that we've got cross-trailer support in the name for this. In my local area, we've had firewood coming as a huge economic development, but we were actively involved with myself, the members and parish council members who make sure that where they don't need their land, which is actually the development there, it's going to be a relatively small part of that, and the rest of the area, they're going to make significant efforts to improve biodiversity there. So we will have a case example of a large economic development that is using the land of their, of their business in Biography of the Sea Games. So we can do this, and we can send out a message to the world and our children that we did something to address the climate change. Thank you. Thank you. Councillor Roberts, I would allow you to speak a sentence on the motion. Will you take our please into consideration? I have four personal comments, and I am sorry they were made, but this is not the place to respond to them. If you wish to speak to the motion, you may now speak. So I'm sorry, Teran. It's absolutely the right place, and I will do. A comment was made about me, an allegation which is a lie, was made about me, and in a planning application, I am going against an individual, Councillor Roberts, this is not the place to speak. I am going to say that I am going to say, no, I will not tell them. I will not tell them. It's been said that I was doing something wrong. I did not do the three villages against that particular applicant. It's not the applicant who took over the Chinese approval. It is. They run this up to the three villages, Foxton, Farming, Antwerth, who were all against it. We voted this council for the application and appeal to refuse it, and her allegations are absolutely disgusting. Chief Regent herself, she's not fit to be here. Councillor Henry, you should speak to the motion that you may do otherwise. I'm going to speak to the gentleman that's been quite important to be clarified and to try to do a great job of how to do that. We should take that up later, thank you. I have no further speakers, so Councillor Haynes will be back to you. I'd just like to say thank you very much for making this really possible. It's 90, and we're just getting through. It will not be easy, but as Councillor Docking said, you need aspirations to come alongside, and as Councillor Senn said, but either we have to show in the combined voice of joint voice that there are aspirations of this vision and the developers will come with us, and they will fight, but by putting double in nature, we're putting something that is tangible as an inspiration for the vision. There will not be really any planning of anything in the motion together with officers when it's being done, it's a mapping to see where it's viable, why is it viable, and if you're going to place something, why and how. And that's the kind of mapping, the kind of evidence that we need to understand trade-offs, to find balance in what every single time will be really difficult. And so thank you for supporting me, but at least this is the aspiration of the vision we have, and we were able to achieve it. Every single case will be difficult, but by having it in mind, and by improving this motion, we bring it up for planning hierarchy, which has never been, and we put it there alongside the other objectives of planning hierarchy. Thank you very much. Thank you again for the vote. If you approve this motion, you can press the green button. If you wish to oppose it, you can press the red button. If you wish to abstain, you can press the yellow button. Does everyone agree? They will see who's up. The second version in favour of one attention the motion is carrying. That includes our consideration of motions, but may I encourage members to please? If you wish to submit a motion, you can solve it with democratic services before you submit, so that we can solve the problems that prevent a personal motion from being taken today. I did. Thank you. We move to Chairman's engagements. There are two engagements to report in addition to those printed on the agenda on Monday, 27th of May, the Vice-Chair will be attended on the morning of the day, 29th of January, on Wednesday, 26th of June, the Vice-Chair will be attended on the civic open day at RAF Wallsworth at RAF Auckland where national inclusion will be attended, and those will be added to the agenda. Most of these engagements are not to me for the great purpose. However, there is one that you have attended on behalf of this council in Jersey in the Royal Service for the Royal Council. He was a good friend with this council as well as obviously a good friend in the city, and Chair, I thank you for your representation. Subject to those traditions, and we move to the institutional press and public on page 9, Romans 9, of your agenda. New members agree that the following item of business on the verbal page contains exempt information falling into the paragraph 1, thousand before you continue on this council item. Yes, I want to say I'm very, very sorry to have so much that's been happening in Romania, and I think that was causing a lot of trouble. I apologise, Chair, but thank you. I propose before the Germans that these verbal pages should remain a verbal one. The press and public will be excluded from these during consideration of the following item of business. Here at all, sorry, I ask members to agree that the following item of business on the verbal pages contains exempt information falling into the paragraph 1, and the public interest in maintaining the exception outweith the public interest in disclosing the information. We may debate that proposal, well that's for a second in a moment, but in debating the proposal we may not refer to the presentation on those pages, because until we agree that we do serve that they are not confidential, they will be confidential. Is everything happening with that? So, do I have a second please? No, we do not have to make a statement. Anyway, just to all have to say is this here. This all matter came for council previously where council made a resolution, passed a resolution to the press in public, and it would actually fall along from that resolution, and no matter it came back to the minutes to be approved, the officers would therefore prepare these papers, so we don't think that determination in the first instance to be as a policy resolution goes past the council last time. We are very strong with the view that that resolution should be passed, because the information contained within the papers is to an organisational view and council to face the results of which are not being published. So it is our view that members should pass that resolution on the ground stage. I think I want to be there, just by looking around members please not discuss the detail that we will be able to find. Thank you. With that explanation do we still have a certificate of my statement? Do I have a statement of peace? Or my statement of peace? Thank you for answering that one. Right, members we will discuss this, but please may I remind you with no reference in the detail that comes to mind. I've seen many mobilisation reviews. I have leaked a few parts, but that was a lot of time ago. It does seem to me that there is a discussion going on here about the organisation of the council. I'm not aware of anything that would be sensitive to one particular person and therefore I believe that the balance should be a favour. How is the treatment of those on releasing the information of the potential? Therefore I would like to not extend the pressure but we will do that for all of us. Thank you, Sharon. I'm one of those people that picked papers and keeping them confidential should actually be kept to minimum. So a little bit like the British ambassadors' emails about President Trump and then the following reaction from the Met which was well over the top as they certainly were state secrets. Interesting, quite funny, but not straight secrets. Again, this seems to me to be the same situation here. I think it's really quite important as well that as much information of how this organisation is found is actually available to the public and to SCAP as well. I really cannot say anything in this particular case that Lawrence is being kept as a close and confidential item. I really would have to say I think we've got to really avoid secrecy whether that be closing meetings to the public or not allowing them actors because anthroids that we are representing, we are only their voice, we're not here instead of them. I do believe that open government is good government closed government of whatever level leads to people wondering how much more we need secrets and what we are about as organisations. So I would ask members to carefully consider this is this really something that requires it being kept confidential if you and me feel it doesn't then you know which way to go. Thank you. Thank you. I can't see the consultation is placed upon what's in this. I do believe that I can't see what's happening here is our way the need to to keep a secret that last year we only had wonderful council meetings that didn't result in exclusion as the public is avoided. This council is getting a reputation for being very close to the council even the community chairs and staff review are sure to have good grounds that the more it gets to use the less value it is and the less respect all of us have from our residents. We need to be open and transparent about as much as possible. Something that I hope colleagues in the Llywodraff Party value as much as myself. At least in a public interest let them see at least the minutes. I quite complete my question. Thank you. I agree that pink paper should be kept and I find them quite irritated I don't quite exclude people particularly if there's a public and they're in trouble to come here it seems so discouraging because I'm discussing something that they can't be driven to. My understanding in this case is that the original paper is on pink paper and therefore what results of that has to be in pink papers. But I do think that we ignore the advice of our legal advice at our peril so if the advice needs to be confidential then I would have to have. I don't think I could reject that actually if that's all the clear advice is. What we're talking about here is our staff and protecting our staff and there's reference to a community which hasn't been made public here and the department that we had in this was discussed was about making sure that we protect our staff. We don't alarm them, we don't worry them there's nothing to worry about and so this is just about being mindful of our staff and well being not increasing their anxiety. So I think in this case it is justified that I appreciate comments from Councillor Williams and from Councillor Roberts about openness and transparency and that I will be personally keeping an eye on the frequency of the papers to see if there are opportunities to reduce them because I do a great urgency to be quite a lot of length. So I think that this is about protecting our staff and following the process that's already underway. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. I think that as I said I think that's the most important about protecting staff. Actually if you keep things secret from staff they are far, far more worried than any person. And I've read this through and if I can find anything that will separate about it it would be really exciting. But actually very boring. Thank you Councillor Williams. Do you wish there was a point that doesn't go really well? Yes. I think that that's a great question because I believe in a third of tier 2 and 3 but as far as I can see it's only 1 and 2. The number of sites is the issue that you should comment on until we have decided that the material is to be public. If you follow the officer recommendation that this material should remain confidential if you wish it to be removed and pushed into the lobby of the main you press the red button if you wish to stay you press the yellow button. Let's say everybody voted and we see the result. 34, 4th motion and 10 against it therefore remains confidential material. But we haven't finished yet. I therefore refuse to press the public to be excluded from these injuring integrations of calling items of business in accordance with section 100A subsection 4 of the local government act 1972 on the grounds that it presently would be a disclosure to the public centre of information as defined in paragraph 1, 2 and 4 of part 1 of schedule 12A of the act as amended. Do I have a second for that please? Thank you, Councillor Brandon. Does anyone wish to debate on this motion? Can we agree this motion then? We agree to do that. Thank you. In that case officers need to be sure that the public area is in place.