 What do you think of the claims we need a new term for capitalism? I think the bogus, I don't think we need a new term. Capitalism is a great term. Capitalism is from the mind. It goes back to Greece and it's about the mind. Capitalism, as described by Marx, he described it well. It wasn't like Marx when he described capitalism didn't get it right. He then rejected it, but he described it right. It's a system of private property. And it's a system of free markets, free of regulations, free of control. That's what Marx hated about them. But the system as described by capitalism is the right term. What we need is to rescue it from people who describe today's system as capitalism. And then we have to rescue it from people who think that if you modify it, it's better, like conscious capitalism. Have you ever heard of conscious capitalism? I mean, that's terrible. That's what I mean, that regular capitalism is not conscious. But somehow you need conscious capitalism. So, I don't know, all kinds of moderate ways to describe capitalism. No, you don't need any of that. Capitalism is a great term and it's well understood. What we need to do is not let people dilute it by assuming that what we have today is capitalism. Like, we need a new capitalism. We need a safe capitalism. We need a kinder capitalism, a softer capitalism, a conscious capitalism. No, we just need capitalism. We need to move towards capitalism and stop moving away from capitalism. And that's an easy argument to make. Easy argument to make. So, no, we don't need a new term. And I don't know of a new term. People have played with free markets. And for a long time, the conservatives thought, oh no, if we just call it free enterprise, people will come on our, people will embrace free enterprise. They hate capitalism. They hate free markets. What they like is free enterprise. So, if you look at Arthur Brooks and a bunch of conservatives used free enterprise everywhere all the time. They talked about it. Has that increased? Increased the number of people who embrace capitalism? No. It doesn't change one iota because what people dislike is the content, not the word. What we need today, what I called a new intellectual would be any man or woman who is willing to think. Meaning, any man or woman who knows that man's life must be guided by reason, by the intellect. Not by feelings, wishes, whims or mystic revelations. Any man or woman who values his life and who does not want to give in to today's cult of despair, cynicism and impotence. And does not intend to give up the world to the dark ages and to the role of the collectivist. All right. Before we go on, reminder, please like the show. We've got 163 live listeners right now. 30 likes. That should be at least 100. I figure at least 100 of you actually like the show. Maybe they're like 60 of the Matthews out there who hate it. But at least the people who are liking it, you know, I want to see, I want to see a thumbs up. There you go. Start liking it. I want to see that go to 100. All it takes is a click of a click of a thing, whether you're looking at this. And you know, the likes matter. It's not an issue of my ego. It's an issue of the algorithm. The more you like something, the more the algorithm likes it. So, you know, and if you don't like the show, give it a thumbs down. Let's see your actual views being reflected in the likes. But if you like it, don't just sit there, help get the show promoted. Of course, you should also share and you can support the show at your own bookshow.com slash support on Patreon or subscribe star or locals and show your support for the work, for the value, hopefully you're receiving from this. And of course, don't forget, if you're not a subscriber, even if you just come here to troll or even if you're here like Matthew to defend Marx, then you should subscribe because that way you'll know when to show up. You'll know what shows are on, when they're on. You'll get notified, right? So, yes, like, share, subscribe, support. Like, share, subscribe, support. There you go. Easy. Do one or all of those, please.