 authors always want to know reasons for rejection. So how do you perceive their work? And when I say authors, I'm referring to foreign authors from English as second language in some countries as well as, you know, authors from US. So according to you, from your experience, what are the major reasons for papers getting rejected? Well, I can't say that there's necessarily any single reason. There could be any number of reasons. All of our rejections and acceptances are determined by our associate editors and our editor-in-chief. And the possibilities can range, you know, from it's not high enough quality or priority. Maybe it's not innovative enough or it could be that we recently published something very similar. There's just any number of reasons that might lead to a piece being rejected. But say, for example, in your editorial, say, discussions or updates, have you as a group identified, say, top five issues that you face or top five reasons that lead to rejections? We haven't really done any, really any studies or reports about that. Like I said, it's really just depends, you know, it goes through the peer review and it just depends on what they find that's positive or negative about the study. You know, we'll have multiple people look at it even before a manuscript is accepted. We have, you know, the entire editorial team have, they have an opportunity to take a look at it just to see, you know, if it meets the high standard of quality, you know, for GIE. So, you know, I wish I had specifics, but I can't really give a set, you know, top few reasons that something might be rejected. So, let me put this across this way. So, what are your top quality expectations from a manuscript? Well, really it needs to make sure that you need to make sure that it's sound research. You know, check that your statistics are correct. Check that your facts are correct. Make sure that it's original work. It's something that hasn't been already published. You know, you can definitely do a search of the literature and see what else is out there. And just make sure that you're writing clear, concise work. Content is really the most important thing, I would say. You know, it's important to, you know, when you're submitting a paper to any journal to look at their guidelines, read the instructions for authors. Make sure that you're submitting the correct components, the correct formatting, but it's really all about content when it comes to acceptance or rejection. Absolutely. Yeah, I mean, if the science is sound enough. Right. Like you said, one of your main challenges is to get good publications. If the science is good enough, there are higher chances of getting accepted in the journal. Quality of language is a common reason for rejection? No, it's, like I said, a manuscript could be accepted or rejected for any reason, but we do give leeway when we have an author who's not particularly comfortable writing in English. You know, it's more about content when it comes to that, but like I said, we do encourage authors who are uncomfortable writing in English to use translation services or have somebody who is a native English speaker look over the manuscripts so they can, you know, help kind of clean it up, I guess, a little bit. Just, just, it certainly makes it easier for the reviewers and editors to understand and appreciate the research if the writing is clear. Well, we do recommend that if you're not comfortable writing in English that you have a native English speaker look over your submission before you submit it or you use a translation service. We give leeway to non-English writers. Obviously, we're not just flat out rejecting papers if they have grammatical issues, but it's, you know, it's always great to just make sure that you're turning in the best quality submission that you can, and if that means that you need to have it looked at by somebody who's more familiar with the language, then, you know, that might be a good option.