 And yeah, my name is Alexander Sander. I do represent the Free Software Foundation Europe, and we are charity to empower users to control technology with the use of open source software. And we also welcome the aim for more cyber security also in free and open source software. However, I want to build on what's already have been said here. There are some specific issues with the Residual 10 here in the proposed text and it won't fix security in open source, like on a large level. But it can also harm open source ecosystem and therefore we want to propose a way to ensure more security and at the same time strengthening the open source ecosystem. Therefore, first, we need to shift liability from developers to those who deploy the software. And second, we need to make sure that those who financially benefit from this deployment should also be the ones who make sure that the software is secure so that we make sure that not for profit organizations, for example, excluded. So free and open source software visit for freedoms to use, study, share and improve the code makes it very easy for everyone to develop and to improve the code and but that's making it available to everyone. And this also means that all others can use and deploy the software without caring too much about the security them. And then might point to developers that get micro payments, small amounts for their work, or even if they are nonprofit, or even do not earn a single year for their work, then might run through these procedures which is a huge problem to the open source ecosystem. And that's why I want to put the burden of liability to source entities that deploy the open source software. And if you would focus on development, that would mean that a lot of free and open source project have to stop their work as they simply don't have the amount and the funding to run through these procedures. So, in this regard, the CIA should replace the concept of commercial activity with an approach that focus on deployment and the entity that benefits on the market. We want an exclusion for non for profit entities and micro enterprises, and at the same time, the liability should be then moved towards those deploying these solutions and are bigger than non for profit on micro enterprises. But as it is ensured that all free and open source software solutions are used on a significant level assessed under the CIA, and the financial burden is moved to those who profit on the market with those solutions. So, but as we ensure that small projects are probably funded, or that those deploying the software make sure that it is secured by their own. And by the nature of force that we can use that to share and improve it. And these changes will be then also available to everyone, which increases the level of security for all. We also want to move it to an article. So that would be also good. So the recital is recital to an article and yeah, that's from points from outside. Thanks a lot.