 Ever since George Galloway secured a resounding victory by advocating for Gaza's defence in parliament, many of his videos have faced censorship. Accusations ranging from being un-British to his election being labelled a nightmare reflect the fear within the British establishment of Galloway's potential impact on the upcoming general election. The establishment, alarmed by his potential influence, has prompted its media allies to limit the spread of his successful campaign. This recent speech, aired on Sky News Britain, highlights Galloway's determination to speak truth to power upon assuming his parliamentary role. His boldness and sincere commitment to truth resonated strongly with the predominantly Muslim town of Rochdale near Manchester. Galloway's calls for a more principled international order have earned him the ire of the establishment. Our dedication remains unwavering in delivering unbiased news and impartial geopolitical analysis. We encourage you to engage with our content by liking and sharing this video to stay informed. Subscribe for timely updates on Palestine-related developments. A former Labour Party member, Galloway has consistently advocated for peace in British politics. His recent election victory is a rebuke to politicians who prioritise Gaza's crisis over achieving a just peace that holds the occupation accountable and ends land seizures across the Middle East. Mr. Galloway's election decisively articulates the British people's stance on the Gaza crisis, revealing their desire for both an end to terrorism and a just peace, including the establishment of a Palestinian state. Despite the negative publicity surrounding Mr. Galloway and his campaign, the Workers' Party leader maintains that his victory is not just for Rochdale, but also for Gaza, whose people have endured over 70 years of oppression and occupation with tacit approval from the British political establishment. He assures that he has more plans in store. George Galloway, did you just watch the Prime Minister's speech? I didn't watch it, but I understood the first part of it related to the Rochdale by-election. The Prime Minister has just said that the election of you to Parliament is beyond horrifying. What did you say to that? Well, I can understand how disappointed he is about the by-election. The Conservative Party, which is the government of the country, was crushed, not just by me, but by an independent candidate that no one had ever heard of before outside of Rochdale. So it was a disastrous night for the Conservatives and a disastrous night for Labour. I got more votes than Labour and the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats and the Reform Party put together, which adds up to a pretty crushing rejection of the two-party system. So I understand why he's alarmed. I want you to address some of the specifics that the Prime Minister said about you this evening. He said that you backed Hezbollah. Is that true? I don't know what that means, backed Hezbollah. I oppose Israel's occupation of Lebanon, and I respect the right of people in occupied territory to resist their occupier. And I've done so since Hezbollah was formed and Israel occupied much of Lebanon right up to the Letani River, regularly bombing Beirut and so on. So I'm not sure what business that is of his, because you see, Hezbollah, a terrorist organisation and part of the government of Lebanon, a country with which we have sovereign diplomatic relations. I had this debate with Skye's Anna Botting. In 2006, it's quite an epic clip, you should watch it. I've seen a lot more than 100 million people have. They said all these things about me in the by-election. And in the by-election, it was them that were crushed in the democratic process. While we acknowledge the necessity for the interviewer to fulfil their duties effectively, it became apparent to us that the interviewer was not truly a journalist. Rather, he seemed to align himself with the political establishment in Britain, and supported the atrocities in Gaza without facing appropriate accountability based on principles of human rights defence. What truly captured our attention was how Galloway stole the spotlight by downplaying the significance of the title Prime Minister. He consistently referred to Rishi Sunak as a non-elected parliamentarian with no valid justification to question his election. The parliament was astute, considering Sunak campaigned on a platform of change but continued the unpopular policies of his predecessors, sponsoring wars worldwide while neglecting pressing domestic challenges. Sunak's Britain has fallen into recession, with poverty rates increasing by the day. This is not the Britain people envisioned. Voters sought a leader who could revitalise the economy and diplomacy while maintaining valuable alliances. Britain's new military objectives in Yemen amidst threats in the Red Sea illustrate Sunak's adherence to the old order. Thus, Galloway's election serves as a complete rejection of the Sunak approach. Britain's crave something new and reflective of their current reality, not an idealistic pursuit of superpower status beyond their shores. The era of British aggression must end. A fresh and dynamic approach is needed. As voters understood this and for Galloway supporters, the writing was on the wall. So I'm not sure why he would reheat it. Now, the Prime Minister is saying that he is God. We're talking about little Rishi Sunak in the fag end of his Prime Minister ship. Don't talk to me as if he's come down from the mount with tablets of stone. The things that he says are somehow meant to owe me. They may owe you, they don't owe me. A lot of people have just watched what the Prime Minister said. This is your opportunity to respond to what he said. He says that there are forces here at home trying to tear us apart. He is implying you are a divisive figure. You have run an election campaign that has tried to appeal particularly, not entirely, to one section of the community. Who won the election? Me or Rishi Sunak? I've got the Democratic mandate here, not Rishi Sunak. He didn't even come second. He was lucky to come third. So don't put to me statements made by Rishi Sunak, as if I'm supposed to be impressed by them. He don't impress me much. We at Sky have spent some time today on the streets of Rochdale. And there are people who say that they feel intimidated by people like you and the people that have supported you. And they have pointed out that you have concentrated your campaign on affairs and they worry that Rochdale will not be the widowed. That's my answer to you. I was just elected with a thumping majority by the electorate in Rochdale. That's all that matters to me. So why are there people in the streets of Rochdale today worried? Well, people voted yesterday and they voted for me. Why is that difficult for you to grasp? At this critical juncture, the Prime Minister's opinion holds little weight to the collective aspirations of the nation. With impending elections, the battle lines are being drawn, forcing the people of Great Britain to make pivotal choices. This time the options boil down to those prioritizing domestic concerns versus those perpetuating a facade of superpower status while neglecting internal issues. As anticipation builds for the impending political upheaval, panic seems to grip the established order following last Friday's unexpected turn of events. The anxiety is palpable, as evidenced by Rushi Sunak's candid admission of how the Gaza crisis has tarnished his party's reputation. In recent weeks and months, we have seen a shocking increase in extremist disruption and criminality. What started as protests on our streets has descended into intimidation, threats and planned acts of violence. Jewish children fearful to wear their school uniform lest it reveal their identity. Muslim women abused in the street for the actions of a terrorist group they have no connection with. Now our democracy itself is a target. Council meetings and local events have been stormed. MPs do not feel safe in their homes. Longstanding parliamentary conventions have been upended because of safety concerns. And it is beyond alarming that last night the Rochdale bar election returned a candidate who dismisses the horror of what happened on October the 7th, who glorifies Hezbollah and is endorsed by Nick Griffin, the racist former leader of the BNP. I need to speak to you all this evening because this situation has gone on long enough and demands a response not just from government but from all of us. Britain is a patriotic liberal democratic society with a proud past and a bright future. We're a reasonable country and a decent people. Our story is one of progress, of great achievements and enduring values. Immigrants who have come here have integrated and contributed. They have helped write the latest chapter in our island story. They have done this without being required to give up their identity. You can be a practicing Hindu and a proud Britain as I am, or a devout Muslim and a patriotic citizen as so many are, or a committed Jewish person and the heart of your local community and all underpinned by the tolerance of our established Christian church. We are a country where we love our neighbours and we are building Britain together. But I fear that our great achievement in building the world's most successful multi-ethnic, multi-faith democracy is being deliberately undermined. There are forces here at home trying to tear us apart. Since October the 7th, there have been those trying to take advantage of the very human angst that we all feel about the terrible suffering that war brings to the innocent, to women and children, to advance a divisive, hateful ideological agenda. On too many occasions recently, our streets have been hijacked by small groups who are hostile to our values and have no respect for our democratic traditions. Membership of our society is contingent on some simple things that you abide by the rule of law and that change can only come through the peaceful democratic process. Threats of violence and intimidation are alien to our way of doing things. They must be resisted at all times. Nearly everyone in Britain supports these basic values but there are small and vocal hostile groups who do not. Islamistic extremists and the far-right can feed off and embolden each other. They are equally desperate to pretend that their violence is somehow justified when actually these groups are two sides of the same extremist coin. Neither group except that change in our country can only come through the peaceful democratic process. Both loathe the pluralist modern country we are. Both want to set Britain against Britain and recognise the evils of anti-Semitism and anti-Muslim hatred for their own ends. The faith of Islam peacefully practised by millions of our fellow citizens is emphatically not the same thing as the extremist political ideology of Islamism which aims to separate Muslims from the rest of society. Islamist extremists and far-right groups are spreading a poison. That poison is extremism. It is not the same thing as the extremist political ideology of Islamism which aims to separate us from our confidence in ourselves as a people and in our shared future. They want us to doubt ourselves, to doubt each other, to doubt our country's history and achievements. They want us to accept a moral equivalence between Britain and some of the most despicable regimes in the world. They want us to believe that our country is a problem. In short, they want to destroy our confidence and hope. We must not allow that to happen. When these groups claim that Britain is and has been on the wrong side of history, we should reject it and reject it again. No country is perfect. But I am enormously proud of the good that our country has done. Our place in history is defined by the sacrifices our people have made in the service of their own freedom and that of others. And when these groups tell our children that they cannot and will not succeed because of who they are, when they tell children that the system is rigged against them or that Britain is a racist country, this is not only a lie, but a cynical attempt to crush young dreams and turn impressionistic minds against their own society. I stand here as our country's first non-white prime minister leading the most diverse government in our country's history to tell people of all races, all faiths and all backgrounds. It is not the colour of your skin, the God you believe in, all where you were born that will determine your success, but just your own hard work and endeavour. We must be prepared to stand up for our shared values in all circumstances, no matter how difficult. And I respect that the police have a tough job in policing the protests we have seen and that they are operationally independent. But we must draw a line. Yes, you can march and protest with passion. You can demand the protection of civilian life, but no, you cannot call for violent jihad. There is no context in which it can be acceptable to beam anti-Semitic tropes onto Big Ben in the middle of a vote on Israel Gaza. And there can be no cause that you can use to justify the support of a prescribed terrorist group like Hamas. And yes, you can freely criticise the actions of this government or indeed any government. That is a fundamental democratic right, but no, you cannot use that as an excuse to call for the eradication of a state or any kind of hatred or anti-Semitism. This week, I've met with senior police officers and made clear it is the public's expectation that they will not merely manage these protests, but police them. And I say this to the police, we will back you when you take action. But if we are asking more of the police, we in government must also back up that call with action. To that end, this month, the government will implement a new, robust framework for how it deals with this issue to ensure that we are dealing with the root causes of this problem and that no extremist organisations or individuals are being lent legitimacy by their actions and interactions with central government. You cannot be part of our civic life if your agenda is to tear it down. We will redouble our support for the prevent programme to stop young minds being poisoned by extremism. We will demand that universities stop extremist activity on campus. We will also act to prevent people entering this country whose aim is to undermine its values. The Home Secretary has instructed that if those here on visas choose to spew hate or protest or seek to intimidate people, we will remove their right to be here. And our Britain must not be a country in which we descend into polarised camps with some communities living parallel lives. It is not enough to live side by side. We must live together, united by shared values and a shared commitment to this country. And I want to speak directly to those who choose to continue to protest. Don't let the extremists hijack your marches. You have a chance in the coming weeks to show that you can protest decently, peacefully and with empathy for your fellow citizens. Let us prove these extremists wrong and show them that even when we disagree, we will never be disunited from our common values of decency and respect. While the Prime Minister's eloquence may sway public opinion, it's crucial not to be beguiled by mere rhetoric. On a technical level, it's the establishment itself undermining the core values of the United Kingdom. The government's failure to hold the occupying forces accountable for the Gaza crisis exposes Britain's hypocrisy when championing human rights and freedoms elsewhere. Singling out Galloway in his speech was a misstep of significant proportions. It's imperative for him and his cohorts to introspect on the true reasons behind the public backlash. Perhaps then, they'll grasp the gravity of the resistance against what they term as British values. Mr. Galloway's message serves as a chilling reminder for those advocating for peace and an end to colonialism in Palestine. Millions and millions of people in this country despise the Prime Minister. I don't respect the Prime Minister at all. What are you planning to do next week when you arrive in Parliament? Well, I'm meeting the Speaker on Monday morning, and then I'll be introduced and sworn in. I'll be escorted by the right Honourable David Davis MP, former Deputy Leader of the Conservative Party. I don't know why he would do that if he thought I was the kind of man you're clearly implying that I am. David Davis is one of the great Parliamentarians of today and this age. And I'll be taking my seat in the House of Commons and speaking for the people of Rochdale. That's what I was elected to do. And what is your message also to Keir Starmer? My message to Keir Starmer is that the skids are under you in scores of Labour seats up and down the country because you've lost the trust, you've lost the confidence of millions of your traditional loyal voters. Now, we have now had an election where two of the candidates have alleged intimidation. The Prime Minister referenced that intimidation in his address on the steps of... The Prime Minister is a rather diminutive, diminished and degraded politician. He made a party political statement. I don't care about Rishi Sunak's attitude. What I care about is that the returning officer, a man of unimpeachable integrity, I'm sure you'll agree, declared a free and fair election and me as the winner. And Rishi Sunak as one of the crushed two big parties in the state. So why are two candidates... You would keep repeating the same questions to me because I have other people to talk to. So let's make this the last one, shall we? We've got a party to talk to. Allegations of intimidation, allegations that your supporters intimidated other candidates. What do you... The returning officer declared it last night. You were there as a free and fair election and me as the winner. And the Electoral Commission and the Electoral Commission today have said that they're going to look and talk to the parties. You're going to have to just suck it up. I won the election. For the records in the recent by-election for the Batley and Spen parliamentary seat, George Galloway emerged victorious with 12,333 votes, outperforming second-placed independent candidate David Tully, who secured 6,638 votes. Notably, Azhar Ali, the former Labour candidate, trailed behind in fourth place, losing support from his party after being caught on record espousing conspiracy theories about Israel. The turnout for the election was relatively low, standing at 39.7%. During his victory speech on Friday, Galloway took aim at Keir Starmer, the leader of the Labour Party, condemning his initial refusal to call for a ceasefire in Gaza amid the ongoing Israeli bombardment, which has claimed the lives of more than 30,000 people in the past five months. Galloway warned Starmer that he would face consequences for his perceived role in enabling and covering up the crisis in Gaza. Representing the Workers' Party of Britain, Galloway accused both Labour and the Conservatives of supporting Israel, and himself as a staunch advocate for the Palestinian cause in a constituency with a significant Muslim population. Thank you for your attention. Please consider sharing and liking this news update with your loved ones. Don't forget to subscribe for the latest developments from Palestine. Until our next update, peace.