 Hello. Good morning, everybody. Thank you for coming with us to this session. This is my colleague Esparmeno of ICAM, Sergio Musteata. I'm Alicia Castillo, representative of the Vice President of Europe. We introduced this session to try to show a little what is ICAM and the possibility to enroll more people from Europe in our ONG. Then our session and my introduction have two important parts. One is to explain a little what is ICAM. I know a lot of people here know well what is ICAM, but I suppose there are other people who don't know well what is ICAM. I think it's necessary to know a little the activity of our scientific committee and the opportunity to enroll in it. And the second part is a little revision or review of your ASTA, the ASTA of the paper, and to propose to debate some key words that are important for the case of world heritage. Concerning ICAM, I think to sum up, I could see we are our ONG of volunteers with 10 or 2,000 members around the world who are specialists in cultural heritage or peculiarities. We are an advisor body of UNESCO with the case of the Convention of the World Heritage Convention. If I have to sum up our activity, our main activity, I think clearly one is to assist as volunteer with our expertise. Several stakeholders and civil society organizations concerning the conflict or not conflict, the best practice or the best way to make management in the world heritage site or cultural heritage site or archaeological heritage site in general. As a result, we have two kinds of knowledge. Part is individual knowledge concerning mission, report, death review for UNESCO, etc. And I think the other part is more interesting and I think it's more important for our scientific committed is the collective knowledge that is consequence of this kind of section. And we produce several documents like charter, recommendation, best practice proposal that try to improve the archaeological heritage management. I think maybe the consequence of the most important consequence of our ONG is the influence that we have in the rules, in the normative of the countries with this kind of document. And the consequence that they can have with the practice of archaeological heritage management. Concerning the case of Europe, I think we have a similar proposal that were born. One is to try to define like EAA or other organization in archaeology, to try to define better the role of archaeological management in Europe. Other is to try to involve more people with other European archaeologists because we are a little, we are around 300 members in our scientific committee. But for Europe, I don't know, we are about 30 members. I think it's very bad for the committee because we have more critical knowledge and for this we need everybody involved in role with us. Of course, other important objective, this is a proof, to look at a space or to look for meeting with other organization of archaeological heritage management in our context in Europe or in other part of the world. Other action that today we cannot speak about is concerning training opportunities that is other topic that we consider important because people need to obey their knowledge and sometimes when you are a manager you have a lot of work, it's difficult to train. And I think this kind of scientific committee is opportunity to prepare some course or similar thing but today we don't speak about this. Of course, one more thing that is very important in the context of Europe is the world heritage site because we have a lot and not only archaeological site, of course they are very important too, but especially archaeological dimension of world heritage site, the other side, because we think it's very important the vision of archaeology, I don't know, in the city, monument, et cetera, not only in archaeological site. And at the same time, I think we can to support other initiatives of other scientific committees in ICOMOS concerning our topic in other case. In this way, I think it's very important to have a unitary position with the general ONG, not only with archaeologists. It is very important to work with other professional of cultural heritage and to try to transmit about the image or the best image of archaeology today. Well, concerning, this is more or less that I would like to tell you to remember or maybe to introduce a little bit of the committee. Concerning the case of world heritage, we made an interesting proposal. I think this is the problem. I decided to highlight, if you allow me, some key words that I consider the different paper that you introduce here are made. This key word, more or less, I think is the first, is professional skills that we need to work with world heritage site, to ask world heritage site the problem, the best practice and the necessities. The second paper is about cities, the third dimension that I spoke previously. The typology of world heritage site that is interesting in Challenger 2, the theory of the water heritage and the water heritage, because it needs a specific measure, I think. The tourist property, of course, that we could here speak about the result of an important conference the previous month, and I think it's interesting to know the conclusion, the conclusion of this conference and the future, the three in this topic. The global accessibility that Sergio, I think, speaks now after me. And not only in the physical way, even in the interpretation way of all that way, I think archaeology has to make a lot here. ITC is a classic topic, but it's very important too. Of course, the conflicted case of reconstruction that Cynthia tried to tell a little about one of these conflicts and how to work after work and how to establish new use of new interpretation of the site post-conflict. And finally, the concept of provenance, I used the last author that we have today. No, it's not here. It's here, sorry. With the problem that we have, maybe, with the data and the information and the consequences in management and in the takeoff decision. But I think everybody here, these nine people, transversely speak a little about interpretation in most of cases and about management plan or management activity that we need to have or we need to improve for what is the best practice in this case. So I am very grateful and I think Sergio, too, if everybody tried to introduce in the paper or in the debate this kind of general topic of management, of course the specific case is very important too, the case studies, but in this kind of session, the object is small, to look for this kind of concern, to rethink a little who is today archeological heritage management. Then my colleagues will now introduce everybody here, but we have a proposal, an alternative proposal, to continue if everybody is here. And I think Marcus is not here. Then I have a proposal of change in the order, but in the order, no, in the table. But now I know this man is not here, no? You think, Marcus? Okay, but probably nobody introduced this paper. Then my proposal could be start with the... until here with three papers, no? And to continue after land, no? With this paper here, to make a discussion with love, Sergio, and after that to continue with paper. Everybody have a problem with this team or agree? Could it not be possible that join us after lunch? What in this case is five from four, four and five? No, but it could be another session or another presentation. But in this case, I think it's the same, because we have now five from four. No, no, we haven't totally four. So I think it's your idea to divide them in two slots. It's good, four before lunch and four after lunch. And between them, of course, discussion slots. And then Marcus will join us. To maintain this. If you agree, Sergio, as you want, I think for me. Thank you so much. Just very briefly. Hello, everyone. Thank you so much for your interest in participating in this session, because for us it's very important to light the role of Hicam in trying to bring the scholars together, the experts together and to discuss about the role of archaeological heritage from various perspectives, not just from academic point of view, but also from preservation to motion, of course, using the tourism approach for future development of the archaeological heritage. According to the Security Council of United Nations, since 2017, you know, the resolution lights very well that heritage is not just an issue of academic approach or preservation, but also it's about the global and regional security. And we have to pay more attention for heritage preservation for using and reusing heritage and also heritage. It's part of sustainable development of our countries. And that's why archaeological heritage is part of this important area which should be better discussed and used for the future development, but taking into account the role and importance of the preservation. That's why I think we succeed to bring together many scholars around Europe. And I think eight presentations today will just demonstrate the role of archaeological heritage in contemporary world and the main problems which are accounted today from various perspectives and also from various experience. So good luck to everyone. Just my request to respect the time. We are somehow limited, so 15 minutes for each presentation. And then, of course, we have the time.