 Let's move now to Seattle at Carolina and two, you know, interesting running backs here with Chris Carson, Chris McCaffrey, Carson, Uber chalk. He was 72.5% in the WFFC, which was made sense, you know. Yeah. Yeah. Like, like I said, I mean, I knew it happened, but I wanted to block out. I don't know. It was, it was scary, but I mean, Carson came through in a predictably great spot in the end, 24 carries, 133, 133 yards. Two touchdowns, also two targets. But I mean, you don't play Chris Carson for targets. So, I mean, he should have a featured role without Rashad Penny the rest of the way. His price is probably going to get jacked up after such heavy ownership in the production. I don't want to chase him because he lacks receiving upside. He also lacks receiving floor. And we say it a lot, even though Fandals a half PPR site receiving work matters for running backs, you can get kind of easier yards and you can get extra touches on average target for a running back as twice as valuable in terms of average fantasy points as it carries. So just keep that in mind. I'm not going to be chasing Chris Carson. So I'm going to struggle with him, probably assuming his price goes way up. We're assuming Chris Carson will get a pretty major salary bump here, given how popular he was this week. And it makes sense, given that there was no Rashad Penny. I am higher on him than you because they are at home and facing Arizona. Literally the best situation you could have, I think for a running back outside of Miami, because it's a high pace game, they want to run the football they should be able to. So I would say an appropriate salary for Chris Carson. Like, if we're going to make Derek Henry, $9,400, I think that Chris Carson in the eighty three hundred dollar range is appropriate. What about you? Yeah, I have made those comparisons before the two and you said to ignore them, so I think it's just it's it's a little funny to me. OK, no, you're right. You're right. You're right. One one air one air in salary does not mean does not justify another one. You're right. You're correct. I'll give you that. But yeah, I think would you say like eighty eighty three? Yeah, I think that's probably where he'll be. I think that's the right range because he's going to he's on the lock for 20 carries, maybe a target or two. The touchdown equity should be high. I don't have the total on that game just yet. But I mean, it's it's going to be high. It's going to be good. It's 40 because it's the Seahawks in a game where they should be ahead. It's actually 51. I lied to you. But yeah, he's he's eighty two hundred dollars. I think that's appropriate. I think that yeah, we know he's going to get the football when he's healthy, when he's on the field and we know that they want to run the football. We know they should be able to like I agree that there are still limitations to his profile without without the passing down work. But that's the exact and there are a very narrow set of circumstances which guys like that work out. This happens to be one of those games where that does work out.