 OK, I will go quickly to the oil palm sent in the landscape based a bit on the guidelines that Anja provided us. Well, the whole idea with this sent in the landscape, which is another of the thematic sent in the landscapes, which is a bit not quite, it doesn't necessarily adjust to the concept of sent in the landscape. So in our perspective, this is more of a network of oil palm sent in the landscapes, or landscape where oil palm is the main dominant economic activity that is shaping the land use trajectories of this landscape. So I think that's a bit the way in which we have been trying to understand and also the way in which these different landscapes that relate to global value change and how is that these global value change are putting pressures or opportunities to land use dynamics in the landscapes. So we were exploring to what extent this was possible, but I think it's important to say that at the beginning very much of this idea was to try to embed our process of data collection and analysis within the other sent in the landscapes. However, we have faced different difficulties in the sense that the different sent in the landscapes, they have defined the boundaries of the landscapes with different ways. The timing of starting the work in the different landscapes has been different. So we decided that we were going to initiate our activities of setting up our work, defining our boundaries, and then try to relate with the activities of the other sent in the landscapes. I think we have been able to do that in some of the sent in the landscapes, mainly in Borneo, Peru, a bit in Cameroon. But also what happens is that we have to expand our network of landscapes that we were looking at, because not all the sent in the landscapes that are looking at oil palm. So the main justifications to start this work and how is that this idea was a bit accepted by the whole group in starting this activity was that oil palm is one of the major drivers of land use change and in the tropics. So it was good to have a more closer understanding of these dynamics and their impact across different socioeconomic and institutional context. And our main focus is on assessing the expansion of these dynamics. So we have been focusing in six landscapes where there's an important expansion of oil palm and one important perspective that we want to contribute to the whole discussion of oil palm because I think every week there's a new report coming up on oil palm with opinions about what are the impacts, implications and what should be done in order to regulate expansion. So we wanted to give more empirical data or provide more empirical data to this discussion and to bring a much more nuanced perspective about what expansion of oil palm may mean in different contexts where we have different political economies, different histories of land occupation, different market opportunities and different biophysical conditions. So it's much more nuanced perspective about the trajectories of oil palm when oil palm moves from Southeast Asia to another context. And as you see, well, but mainly main oil palm expansion is concentrated while in Malaysia they moved to Indonesia, big expansion in Indonesia, but also investments were flying to Africa, Central Africa, West Africa and a bit of expansion in Latin America. So I think that brings more opportunities to start thinking about what the expansion of global value change of oil palm may mean in the different context. And but still the consumption is concentrated in very few countries, no India, China. Domestic markets are quite important, not only for Indonesia, but also in the other countries in Africa, in Latin America, very much in Latin America, the expansion is dominated by domestic markets. And what also you can see is that the dynamics of prices, international prices of oil palm that they really have pushed the expansion of this crop, but also there is this decline in the last year. So we don't know exactly what this decline is going to mean in terms of how companies are going to manage their investment strategies, the stocks, et cetera. So I think it's still an interesting timing to keep understanding about what are the implications of oil palm. So we selected seven landscapes. This has been a bit an opportunistic selection of landscapes, a bit based on what the other groups were doing, and as I said, trying to build on that work. So we choose the Sumatra, Borneo. So we are working in Iscalimantan. We are looking, linking with West Calimantan, the center in the landscape that Ips is coordinating. And also Cameroon in Central Africa. And we did some work in Nigeria as well, because Nigeria is an important country for expansion on oil palm. And we started to explore dynamics of oil palm expansion in some countries in Latin America. So very much we focus on Peru, in the Peruvian Amazon. Then Colombia. Colombia is an important country in Latin America because there's much more development of plantations of oil palm in that country. And also we started to look at Brazil because there were big plans for expanding oil palm in the Northeast part of Brazil. So the government was talking about expanding to million hectares of Brazil. So we started to look at that. But however, we have been doing, and I will talk a little bit this afternoon about these more data collection in Indonesia, Malaysia. Well, I forgot to mention Malaysia, Cameroon, Peru, and Colombia. So we have not been quite active in Nigeria. And in Brazil, we are still struggling in the sense of building a formal process of institutional linkages with Embrapa in order to conduct this work. But that's moving forward. The questions that we are trying to address with this work are very much for, what's the role of oil palm in shaping local and national models of economic development and the impacts of that time, and also what is the role of policies and corporate strategies in shaping these developments. Another question that is very much phrasing also our work of data collection is what are the implications of different business models. We have seen from Malaysia, Indonesia, and then expanding to Africa and Latin America that there are like four or five main different business models that are shaping this development. So understanding these business models and the impact is quite important from a policy perspective. And then we are also exploring what are the different policy responses that countries, corporate actors are putting in place in order to influence or to reduce the negative impacts of these expansions and how to move more towards more inclusive business models. So the outcomes, or how do I see what the outcomes are of this work? I think there's a lot of opportunities to feeding into national strategies for development, sustainable oil palm in the different countries in which we are working. Of course, there are more opportunities in some countries than in others. But I think there's a very intense debate in all these countries and governments are putting in place or promoting multistakeholder platforms for starting this discussion on sustainable and inclusive business model for oil palm. Also where I see the opportunities are in this providing information and knowledge to the learning networks. So there are learning networks that are expanding in the countries. And I think we are trying to feed into those. Very much from this perspective of understanding implications in different contexts from different business models. And another perspective that we are exploring is how to interact with very specific, private, and public initiatives in order to regulate oil palm expansion in a specific context. And that's the case of East Calimant, for example, where we are developing much more efforts to link with specific activities or initiatives at this subnational level. In the way in which I understand the oil palm scent in the landscape, and as we're saying, it's more a network of oil palm scent in the landscape, it's more a platform for collaboration. So we have started to build links with C-Cafs, mainly with Flagship 3, which focuses on mitigation. And in order to understand what sort of institutional arrangement should be in place to govern the expansion of oil palm or to improve the impacts of oil palm. And we are focusing this work at the subnational level in East Calimant in Indonesia. Also, we are linking to some other initiatives like the CSL Sustainable Oil Palm Platform, which is more focused on disseminated information that is available on oil palm. And then we have developing also efforts to link to the global level through RSPO and to feed into the discussions of RSPO about inclusive business models. And then also looking at linking to national processes. So in some of the key countries in which we are doing our work, we are linking either with governments or associations of oil palm growers to inform these processes of debate about options for sustainable oil palm. Our team has been quite active in Cameroon in developing this national strategy for sustainable oil palm development with the Ministry of Agriculture. So that strategy is there's already a document that's on debate. Also, we are linking with this working group on the Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil Platform that has just started two months ago in Indonesia. And also, we are linking with the Feder Palma, which is the Federation of Oil Palm Growers in Colombia, with Sandy Palma, which is the Institute for Research on Oil Palm, in order to look at what are improved options for alliances between companies and small holders. So we are trying to do work across these different levels and also to promote some sharing of lessons. And finally, the efforts or how do we see that this work could expand to the future and in order to bring complementary resources? We have got a proposal accepted by the Swiss National Science Foundation that we developed with ETH, WWF International, and offices in Colombia, Indonesia, and Cameroon, and some national partners to start looking at scenarios for future of oil palm development in the countries in which we think that there are more possibilities to engage with national institutions with our Indonesia, Cameroon, and Colombia. So we are going to start this project next year for the next six years. And then we started to link more actively with the team working on markets in aircraft and biodiversity. And we come up with one of these ideas for future funding under the Sentinel Landscape Initiative, which is looking at the impacts from global market forces and interventions that support sustainable business landscapes and livelihoods. And in addition, we have several other small projects supporting this agenda on looking at oil palm development and replications. I think this has been a way, as I was saying, to bring together the teams working on oil palm to come up with the network and platforms. But this work does not necessarily include all the work that the centers, members of FTA, have been doing on oil palm. I think there's much more that has been done, and there's also much more need to integrate that work that has been done outside of this small initiative, I would say. Thank you.