 If you hold a Bayesian confirmation theory in the philosophy of science, it's going to be almost trivially true that there's going to be lots of evidence for Christianity. I maintain that there is none and that that's the reason why in 20 years of talking to Christians, I've never gotten an answer to that question about what the evidence is. First step, you have to assume there's a supernatural. What was the evidence of that? One was the changed lives of the individuals in the congregation. That also applies to every religion and paranoid conspiracy theorists that anybody can duplicate this. You can adopt a new hobby or become interested in politics and get the changed lives effect on the Bayesian concept of evidence. That's going to qualify. Every religion claims the same thing. I've read testimonies from Hindus, from the Bhakti, from people in Thailand who were worshipping the traditional God. That was my favorite one. My favorite one. Where are you going with this? Where are you going? To the end of a sentence if I could get there. Again, if it's the same fact indicated by all religions, then it can't indicate the truth of any of them. If only one of them can be true and they're all experiencing the same thing, then the thing is not indicating the truth.