 It's the story that our media absolutely does not want to talk about. The controversy surrounding the Hunter Biden laptop, the Twitter files, and allegations of a cover-up by both the media and the government. Now with Republican-led oversight committee starting to ask questions, we're seeing the media and government actually pointing fingers at each other. Who's telling the truth and who's trying to hide the facts? Join us as we see how scared and desperate these people truly are. Let me ask you about more about your oversight responsibility. You've made it clear you're going to be looking at Hunter Biden and his financial entanglements with foreign countries, including China. Senator Ron Wyden says these financial entanglements deserve investigation. Will you be investigating that as well? Ask yourself, has ABC News or any mainstream news outlet ever tried to discredit an investigation into Republicans by hounding Democrats to instead investigate other Democrats? No. Absolutely not. And I challenge anyone out there to try and prove me wrong on that. It's something the Democrat media has been hounding Republicans about since they started investigating, always trying to frame it as a pointless partisan fishing expedition into Hunter Biden. When in fact, as they've made clear from the start, it's about Joe Biden. Tell me how you're going to try to de-partisanize an investigation, or do you expect it to be partisan? Well, with all due respect, check out, I disagree with that. I think the only people that see this as a partisan investigation are the media and the hardcore Democrats. And then there are a whole lot of media outlets that have blown this off, and they say this is the Hunter Biden laptop investigation. That is not true. And let me be very clear. This is an investigation of the President of the United States to determine whether or not he and his administration is compromised because of the millions and millions of dollars that they have received from our adversaries in China, Russia, Ukraine, and even the Middle East. Why are they so desperate? Because Republicans are out to prove that Democrats, the FBI, and the media actively suppress bad news for Joe Biden in order to sway the election in his favor. They're scared, shitless, and I can prove it. As co-founder of the Intercept, Glenn Greenwald points out, the pre-election lie and that's what it was, that the New York Post's reporting was based on, quote, Russian disinformation, was first disseminated by Politico and Natasha Burnin, who was rewarded for her lying by being hired by CNN. James Clapper now says they deliberately lied. This is good stuff. James Clapper, who lied under oath, by the way, blames the media for spreading the disinformation that the Hunter Biden laptop story was Russian disinformation. There was message distortion. Former director of national intelligence, James Clapper, told the fact-checker in a telephone interview. All we were doing was raising a yellow flag that this could be Russian disinformation. Politico deliberately distorted what we said. Who's the dead man? He lied about the Hunter Biden story. Remember what Mark Zuckerberg said about the FBI coming to him about Russian disinformation? Basically, the background here is the FBI, I think, basically came to us. Some folks on our team, it was like, hey, just so you know, you should be on high alert. We thought that there was a lot of Russian propaganda in the 2016 election. We have it on notice that basically there's about to be some kind of dump of that similar to that. So just be vigilant. Two words, Mr. President, plausible deniability. So the FBI didn't outright 100% definitively tell him or the media that the Hunter Biden laptop story was Russian disinformation, also known as plausible deniability. That's where the media comes in. Once they started reporting the story as Russian disinformation and 50 intelligence experts came out to confirm, the FBI's tip to Zuckerberg had its intended effect. Politico actually admitted this in their original story about the Hunter Biden laptop. These former intel officials did not actually say that the Hunter Biden story was Russian disinformation. Indeed, they stressed in their letter the opposite, namely that they had no evidence to suggest the emails were falsified or that Russia had anything to do with them. But instead, they had merely implied this suspicion based on their experience. Remember what Klapper said about the media misrepresenting what the FBI had told them? Why did he never say anything about that during any of these media interviews? Well, source matters a lot, and the timing matters a lot, I think. And to me, this is this classic textbook Soviet Russian tradecraft at work. The Russians have analyzed the target. They understand that the president and his enablers crave dirt on Vice President Biden, whether it's real or contrived, it doesn't matter to them. We got you. Could it possibly be because James Klapper is a serial liar? And speaking of serial liars, remember what Adam Schiff said on CNN just before the election? On October 16th, a week before the final presidential debate, Adam Schiff told CNN, Well, we know that this whole smear on Joe Biden comes from the Kremlin. Clearly, the origins of this whole smear are from the Kremlin. And the president is only too happy to have the Kremlin help and try to amplify it. So not only was Adam Schiff lying, but he was spreading conspiracy theories a week before the election. Alright folks, I hope you found that informative, yet brief. If you did, please hit that like button, share, and leave a comment to let us all know what you think. Thanks a lot, and I'll see you on the next one.