 Furrier, Larry Ellison loves Infiniband. I want to talk about Infiniband for a minute. Isn't Infiniband dead? They were talking about Ray dead, Tate's dead, Infiniband? I remember talking about Infiniband a decade ago. People used to say, oh, TCPIP, old reliable TCPIP. Look at it now, right? Doesn't Sun use Infiniband? Sun uses Infiniband. So Larry Ellison loves Infiniband. I think that Larry has these expert technology guys around the world, and they give him advice, and he's a pretty hands-on technical guy. Larry is, right? He's pretty micromanager type. And along the way, he fell in love with Infiniband. And people say, well, Oracle has this big stack. They don't have networking. Well, his networking is Infiniband. So the whole world seems to be going to these appliances. They're selling gobs and gobs of exadata. The exologic cloud in the God box is all Infiniband inside there, so super low latencies. Server-to-server communications and server-to-disk communications all inside the appliance. Infiniband, very high speed, loves it. And the technology underneath all that is from Mellanox. So Mellanox is carving out this business model much in the same way that Emulator- Carving out a business model around Larry's money. Well, but so they sell to others, right? I think they sell to Teradata and others. And so Larry upped his investment in Mellanox to, I think, 10%. So now Larry's got a pretty strong interest in Mellanox and maybe at some point in controlling interest, people think maybe he buys the company. So what do you make of that? Well, I think it's actually pretty interesting. I would agree with you. When I talk to customers, there are kind of two spectrums of data in their environment. There's the high-end data that, especially in the large enterprises, where my business is built around this. So high performance, database, data crunching, data computing models, that type of thing. It's almost like, I call it the IT pendulum, right? We've gone from mainframe to open systems and now we're going back to these appliances that, and I don't want to say we're fully going back, but appliances almost mainframe like single standalone systems like the Exadata appliance that I can do high transactional processing for my business environment. It's protected, it's safe, it's high performance. And that gives me my competitive edge, right? So it's no doubt that, given Sun's investment in Infiniband in the past and their support of Infiniband, and like you said, Larry's very technical guys, right? Helping to build high speed, high performance, stay ahead of that curve in the database space, right? It's very, very important to him. And I've always thought Infiniband would be a great component of technology, but again, it comes back down to this investment model, right? I got to do stuff. I got to balance performance with cost in my environment, right? So while as a veritas, product manager, VCS communication between the two nodes, the two nodes that you were using for high availability was critical. You were using TCP-IP to manage that, right? We always said, well, if you could be faster, you can make better decisions in more real time, right? The adoption of that at the end user level never came out to be such that you would do that, but built into these appliances, it makes a lot of sense. So if you can control it, you can control costs and you see what Larry's doing. It's a smart move. And so you're seeing Infiniband move from the domain of high performance computing, HPC, into more mainstream. We talked to Isilon, Isilon talks about, it's got a traditional base and very high end, but it's selling more into insurance companies and banks and financial services and so forth. And so we're starting to see Infinibango mainstream. Here's the thing that's interesting to me. There's not a lot of competition out there. You got Melanox and then you got Voltaire, who's basically super glued itself and built around Melanox, right? So Voltaire is essentially Melanox, but they've done really well from a stock perspective, but I don't know what the legs are. It essentially is Melanox and they got Q-Logic. Now Q-Logic has been behind in terms of Infiniband market share, but they've got some resources. And they've got a customer base. And they've got a customer base. Now here's the thing. If I'm a competitor of Ellison's, what does Ellison want to do to me? He wants to squash me. He now owns 10%- Has he done that before? Right. You see what he's doing with the SAP. He just wants to destroy you. So he's now got 10% of a key technology that you rely upon. So you should probably think about finding second sources of your Infiniband supply, duh. So that's kind of interesting. And the other thing is, if somebody tries to buy Melanox, he can block them, right? He's got 10% of the company. But I agree, but I don't think he'd ever want to own them. Although, I think we said that about Son and look at him now. Well, he might want to own them just to screw his competition and then just own all the Infiniband stuff. He can do that by being the 10% owner too. But I think your advice is right on. I think folks that have been relying on that technology that want to have multi-source and make sure that they're safe and they have better control over their pricing and that sort of thing ought to look at a second source. And Q is the second source. Well, plus, if he owns 10% of it, I guarantee that he's going to get the advanced discussions and the plans and his stuff's just going to work a little bit better than the other guy. From an integration standpoint, that's...