 mass media and role of the state. This topic basically is related to the correlation between the media, politics, politicians and the state. Because there are different lengths through which we can correlate these all factors or elements or there are various differences on this perspective that what type of role media and media has related to the role of state. There is a florist view. They claim that the mass media and especially their relationship with the ruling authority it is quite interesting because there are various individuals and there are various groups those can influence not only the media but as well as the working of the state. So who can control the elite and who can properly advise the elite regarding the policy making and policy implementation because the elites and the decision-makers they have to prepare the policies regarding the working of the state. So if mass media has this power that they dictate to the state and to the elite then it will be very alarming. So the florist view they have their concerns but they admit that media has a very important role regarding the role of the regarding the advising to the elite. So we can say that the perspective that media is an independent entity which tries to spread every available information about every aspect group of society without being under control of any ruling authority or class. This perspective is that in today's situation it is very important because if media has unguided, unchecked information and they are spreading it without analyzing the impact of that information on the society or the state. So this kind of information definitely does not play a positive role in the working of the system. Then another perspective that is the mass manipulative view. So the media has to follow the same perspective, the same direction. Especially if we evaluate it there are a lot of such things in it. There are a lot of affairs of the government regarding which the media usually does such a projection that where people have to be convinced that the specific angle they are pursuing towards a specific direction. Then another view that is called the hegemonic view that this is a brainchild of new Marxist like Gromsky and his view asserts that the bias which is evident in political reporting emerges as a result of the class culture of journalists. This hegemonic view is very interesting. Although it presents that perspective where there are authoritarian systems. In authoritarian systems, media has a special information, a special perspective that especially promotes the rulers, but in today's world, media should be manipulated in such a way that they take the minds of the people to a specific angle, to a certain level where the rest of the aspect does not come to them. Or they should understand it mentally and see how it is happening. The media groups present their point of view in such a way that they divide the opinions of the people in the society. The one who hears it plays the channel of his own will. But he does not feel that this is the effort of the media house that he wants to give you a special point of view and you are unnecessarily forced to listen to the same point of view. Because it is said again and again and we understand that this is the right thing to do. But this is the policy of the media and the minds of the people who are running the media, their policy preference is behind it. Then if we look at the winning of consent and narrative, if we are convinced of a specific point of view, then we start seeing the rest wrong. And this is what is happening in the world these days. For example, the West deliberately started. The big countries started. They especially adopted ways against communism. Then the communist countries also adopted propaganda tactics. And in today's world, even within the countries, this division has been created that every media house, every media channel, in its own owner's perspective, in the context of interest. The interest of the state is sometimes not on top priority, but also focuses on its own projection. And what is happening with this? Societies are being divided. Confusions are being created in people. And in the context of these confusions, the social fabric of every place is going towards more positive interest. Because the element of tolerance is getting lesser. And then people are finding out where these tolerances are coming from within the countries.