 Imam Wazali, for example, is a medieval scholar. He quotes the Bible a lot, actually, in the Iqyar-ul-Middin. He'll quote from the Gospel of Matthew. He quotes a lot from Isa A.S. Sometimes from the Bible, sometimes from our own hadith. But sometimes he does quote from the Bible. So the general rule here is that as long as it doesn't contradict our essential aqida, then you can quote from the Islamic act tradition. But we do it with caution. Imam Wazali actually wrote a great refutation of Christianity called Rukdu Jamil, the beautiful refutation of the divinity of Jesus, based on the Bible itself. He just quoted the Bible. He used the Bible as his proof text that Isa A.S. is not God. Ibn Timia has something similar. Ibn Timia has a book called Rukdu Sahir, which is actually really interesting. Because Imam Wazali, he said, the Bible is corrupted in its meanings, right? It's called tahrir. Tahrir means corruption of text. So Quran talks about the Bible being corrupted in text. But what is the nature of this tahrir? Imam Wazali says, the text itself is sound, but the Christians corrupted the meanings. So he accepts the text of the New Testament. It's called an affirmative approach of the New Testament. But the Christians have changed the meanings of these types. Ibn Timia says, no, the actual text has changed. And this is correct. The text has changed. And he shows different manuscripts that say different things, right? So they have this type of really academic engagement with the Bible. So generally then, there's three types of Isa A.S. There's three types of, or three ways of looking at these Israelite traditions. The first is, those known to be true, because the Revelation of the Prophet said so confirms them. For example, in the fifth book of the Torah, it says, here, or Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is one. OK? You guys want to hear it in Hebrew? Yeah. That is Ahad, right? So we would say, oh, masha'Allah. That sounds like a valid portion of the Torah, right? Allahu Akbar, but it sounds good, right? Isa A.S. in Mark chapter 10, 18, he repeats this verse verbatim, right? He or Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is one. Those known to be true, because the Revelation of the Prophet said so confirms them. The second type are those known to be false, because the Revelation of the Prophet said so rejects them. For example, if you read the Old Testament, you'll read about prophets, like Dawud and Suhaiman, doing things that are completely haram, that are mustahil, impossible for prophets to do. I'm not going to mention what they do. But even we don't do these types of things. We do a lot of things. But these must be prophets, being all kinds of crazy things. So we don't confirm these stories. This is obviously false, right? Or like in a New Testament, it says, Isa A.S. is crucified. All four Gospels mention he's crucified. The Qur'an says, homa ataluhu, homa salabu. So we don't affirm that either.