 58 House Democrats have recently voted to advance articles of impeachment. Impeach them first and then indict them. Yes, the president, a sitting president, can be indicted. Even if the president somehow finds a way to terminate Mueller, the indictments would continue to grind. You could impeach anybody on anything. You can try and indict. He is not functioning as the president of the United States. Frankly, if he ever gets indicted, he'll have insanity as a defense, I suppose, from a criminal charge. But it's hardly, you know, this is a serious matter. You're starting to hear people talk about the possibility that Donald Trump leaves office in two years and then finds himself in the crosshairs of these New York prosecutors. This sitting president can and should be indicted. President, for sure, is more than likely going to serve some jail time. It's clear that Trump is the target and he'll be indicted eventually. On the day Donald Trump leaves office, the Justice Department may indict him. Now there is talk of jail time for the president. That Mueller could indict the president for obstruction of justice. Donald Trump should be indicted for calling a cooperating witness a rat. He should have been indicted. The sitting president can be indicted by the Justice Department. Why aren't we at the target, Trump, having committed crimes to get the presidency? So why aren't we at an indictment yet? I think there's generally consensus that the president is probably committed inditable crimes. It's very strongly in favor of inditing the president when he is out of office. That there may be enough evidence to indict Trump. Is Donald Trump going to be indicted? Maybe it'll happen. Maybe he'll go to prison. Will you ever see the inside of a prison cell? DA could get a ham sandwich indicted. Hey listen, Trump's the big mac. Donald Trump himself is not ever indicted. There is another way that prosecutors can actually indict the entire Trump org. We hope that the Attorney General sees the importance of moving ahead with this indictment, moving ahead with Lock and Steve banning up. The whole enchilada, the whole company, indicted by next week. Why not pursue it and see what happens? Mary Garland, if you indict Trump, you'll be my person of the year, of the decade. The only thing worse than inditing him would be not inditing him. Would be probably not to indict them. Donald Trump is an ordinary citizen and is committing crimes right now. I like the idea of Mark Meadows going to jail for the rest of his life, but I still think that the committee has laid out that the person on top of all of this, in charge of all of this, doing all of this, was Donald Trump. Take now for him not to indict. Frankly would cause this country more harm than even if he indites and there's a hung jury or not a successful conviction. I think there should be no case in which they wouldn't indict. I don't think we should be treating him the way other ex-presidents were treated. I think the extent of what Donald Trump's done is so egregious that no Attorney General, no fair-minded Attorney General would have any choice. According to the Atlantic, Garland is preparing to indict Trump despite moving at the cautious pace of an institutionalist. The only reasons Trump hasn't been indicted by now is because he's a former president and because he has handpicked judges on his side. Accountability for some people means that we get a pound of flesh from Donald Trump and that he ends up behind bars. Don't you think it's about time for special counsel Jack Smith to just indict Trump? And would such a move take Trump off the campaign trail? Is this the charge you would want him to be indicted on? What did January 6 DOJ indictment or say a Georgia election interference charge carry more weight?