  Väst orange ploys  갑 señor allocations developing  jeunes haavin today subway hapr  financially emb ha Kad sha listeners on lack 플� heroin . mayın  expenditures  Azerbaijan  Punjabi ఑ిన్టిసuego. ఆరారాలుల్ ఎఫ్ంటింఠ్సైఆరాడియమి..క్ఝ్ంఖనiksiనువసasts." నిడావసికంవింర్లింామాలాంత్రసింఢనివిఆరంచ౅ానూత్నా. నోరిక్లంయిన్లానోటరిత్తిసింరం�餐త్నానిన్నిండిడిస్రాత్న్మెరిస్న్లా. It shows that the boy is on armors to do what is needful and bring a solution to the conflict. Beyond that, the conflict is a pro-sea world. Armors ask countries that are supporting it in the ongoing conflict. So the most important thing is that the actors that are involved should compromise on their interest for the sake of monetary humanity because of the monetary catastrophe that has happened since the war began. So what I would say is that the international community should continue in their efforts in pressurizing the actors involved in this conflict. Okay, finally, before we let you go now, Festus, the deal itself is neither a resolution to the war nor to the roots of the conflict between Israel and Palestine. Most people have attempted as a significant development that is better than nothing. But what do you think is the long-term solution and the future of Gaza? Firstly, from what is happening to the war that broke out, Israel has been insisting that the post-war situation in Gaza should not be under the control of armors and that idea is being supported by the U.S. But the U.S. is not in agreement with that. To me, I think the future of gammas is to comply with the Austro-Accord of 1993 that said that it is the Palestine that has to be under the administration of Gaza, which we cannot violate, we cannot compromise on that agreement. If we do that, that we violate what we are trying to achieve in the Middle East and it will not bring about a peace that we want. But in doing that, armors should be forced to comply with the international regulation because of only part of the Western government. They are not interested in armors being charged. And we see that armors should not be charged. It's a compromise on their sovereignty. I'm trying to like the post-war argument in Israel to the Afghanistan conflict where the West was not interested in Taliban being in charge of Afghanistan. When it was invaded in 2021, they were removed from the government. But after 20 years of the Taliban's existence in Noray into the give-up, they were eventually allowed to come back to government in 2021. I'm sorry we just have to let you go. We actually have run out of time on this particular discussion. But we'll bring you subsequently to talk more on the ongoing crisis between Israel and Hamas in subsequent bulletins. We do appreciate your time. First of all, Tokumbwa is a conflict and development analyst and he joined us all the way from the United Kingdom many times once again. Thank you. We'll see you in the next video.