 Yn y gweithio'r gwerthg elektroesol, y admau busnes y First Minister y Maen nhw yw? A'i gweithio no 1—Douglas Ross. Aethau'r sefydlog. Mae'n gweithio'r cy 가�u'r ddweud o ramadan yng nghymru rhysgol, a mae'n dros dw i'n credu ar gael eibarwch i gael a ότιach hefyd. Mae rhes Drawdown mewn cymrydau a'i wneud. Byddwyd isi'r ddragu ddweud o'r newid ei bod yn eisg vaccination ddwy rece i Gwneith ynggrifedd. Wel, ytom ni'n fathrof Black Sheep that the drug deaths have risen again, up 10 per cent on the previous year. Hamsa Yousaf's new Minister for Drugs, Christina McKelvie, was asked for her response. She said, the plan is working. Surely the first minister cannot agree with that. First Minister, could I also wish Muslims across the UK and right across the world exciting for a happy Ramadan, although my thoughts are often with those in Muslim communities who are fasting or cannot access food or water, not out of choice, because of their fasting for Ramadan, but because of poverty or, indeed, conflict. The drugs that closely with me, I want to say first and foremost that my condolences and condolences to the entire Government and every single person that has lost a loved one, to suspectedly, drugs death. We know from engaging with those families that we is not warm words, it's not words of sympathies or condolence, they want it is action. I am devastated to see that rise, particularly as of course we saw and witnessed some progress in the year before with the reduction in suspected drugs death. This is a deep-rooted, endemic problem in our society and what I would say to Douglas Ross is that we are taking a range of significant actions to try to tackle this insidious problem in our society. We are absolutely committed, we have an unwavering, unshakable commitment to the national mission to tackle drugs death and that's why we've continued to expand residential rehab and I can give some more detail of that in subsequent answers. We've provided £50 million a year to community and grass-roots organisations that are helping those in their local areas suffering with substance abuse and addiction. We've progressed work with local authorities like Glasgow and, say, for consumption rooms, we've continued to roll out the carriage of naloxone and drive up the mat standard as well as a range of other actions and what we'll continue to do is to make sure that we maintain the drugs budget as well for 24-25. That rise is deeply disheartening, this rise in suspected drugs is deeply disheartening but what a lonely serve to do from a Government's perspective is ensure that we are continuing to rededicate ourselves and recommit ourselves to tackling one of the most insidious challenges and problems that we face in our society. Douglas Ross, the First Minister referenced last year's figures and at the time that former Drugs Minister said in August last year that the Government was turning the tide on the drug deaths crisis. We now hear from the current Drugs Minister that, even with a 10 per cent increase, she believes that the plan is working. It is absolutely not. Drug deaths in Scotland have consistently been the highest across Europe and they're on the rise again. The SNP plan is not working and they seem to be repeating the same mistakes all over again. Nicola Sturgeon let a rehab facility in her constituency close in 2019. Now Hamza Yousaf has let Turning Point 218 a vital rehab service for women in Glasgow close. The head of justice at Turning Point Scotland said this. The loss of this service is likely to lead to more women in custody and trapped within the justice system. The First Minister said in this chamber just in January that it does excellent work. He continued, I value the project very highly. Just a few weeks later, it closed. So why did this happen? First Minister, can I just give an absolute confirmation that the Drugs Minister, Chrystia McElwey and I, during our visit to the bothy, an excellent community project based in Craig Miller, absolutely believes, as I do, that we have to rededicate ourselves and take further action, because we know that that rise is unwelcome. Douglas Ross was right to say that our numbers of suspected drug deaths per head of the populations higher than other parts of the UK have also seen a rise. I suspect that part of that is because of the tide that we are up against. That is, of course, seeing more potent, stronger, more addictive substances on our streets, such as synthetic opioids, nitazines and so on. There is absolutely no complacency about the action that we have to take. In relation to 218, Presiding Officer, it is an important issue that is raised. It should be said that that was a council decision, not our decision, of course. The only decision that we made from a Scottish Government perspective was when Glasgow City Council asked whether it could retain the £1.5 million funding for re-tending to another service. We said that we would allow them to retain that money to be able to use it flexibly. It would also not be correct to say that there are not facilities for women in particular that are facing substance abuse in Glasgow. There is a whole range, and I am happy to release the letter that we received from the health and social care partnership. We have tomorrow women's group, a community-based service for women involved in the justice system. We have the Glasgow Drugs Court, which operates a women's only clinic a day a week. Glasgow has 59 purchased residential placements that are both for men and women in alcohol and drug recovery services. There are 60 tenancy-sustained placements that are specifically open to those in justice social work. We have the First Minister agenda specific community support service, and there are other services that I am happy to talk to in further answers. We continue to provide record funding this year to alcohol and drugs partnerships. We will continue to take actions with our local authorities. Of course, I am happy to continue to work cross-party, as my predecessor did, in order that we all collectively work together to tackle what is one of the most challenging issues that society faces. The First Minister wants to dodge responsibility for the closure of this vital service that has served women in Glasgow for two decades. Let us just listen to what the Unite regional officer Linda Wilson said. This is her words. It is utterly shameful that both Glasgow City Council and the Scottish Government believe that the best way to help vulnerable women is to cut beds and slash the funding of a lifeline service. Newspaper reports today include emails that suggest that the Government was aware that turning point would be closed but did not step in to prevent it. Unite says that it was crystal clear that the Scottish Government was central to the decision-making process that led to the 218 service closing. Humza Yousaf is trying to avoid responsibility. He is using the same excuses as Nicola Sturgeon. Why are the SNP making the same mistakes all over again? First Minister, let me try to reject some of the facts into this discussion. We are not cutting beds. Under the Scottish Government, we have invested £38 million in expanding capacity and residential rehab as part of the national mission. We have 32 of those beds. We have another 38 in the pipeline just over the next few months. With the projected funding that we have, we believe that we are absolutely on track to make our commitment on increasing overall residential rehab capacity from 425 to 650 by 2026. We are also very much on target in relation to the targets that we have set ourselves for publicly funded rehab placements. As Douglas Ross made it, the suggestion that we are cutting residential rehab beds is simply not true. In terms of the decision that was made by Glasgow City Council on 218, I am happy to release the letters if they have not been released already. If I go back to what one of our officials or civil servants wrote to Glasgow City Council, and I will quote directly from the letter, we consider that any decision to retender the service—that is the 218 service—is entirely a matter for Glasgow City Council, but can confirm that we have no objection to the replacement service utilising the funding that is currently allocated to the 218 service. We, of course, did the right thing by ensuring that funding was flexible for the local authority. We now see that, in Glasgow City Council, there are a range of initiatives that are still available for women to be able to access, whether that is, for example, the Lillias community custody centres based in Glasgow and practices of all greatly in supporting all women currently serving sentences in the establishment. Whether it is Glasgow women aid, Hymit Gryff, Glasgow East women's aid, they can provide up to 64 safe places for women and SAY women who support women 16 to 25, have nine spaces and purposely built flats as well. So there is a range of initiatives that have been provided to Douglas Ross with detail of how we are supporting Glasgow City Council and other local authorities in ensuring that the increased residential rehab is not decreasing. I do not know how the First Minister can possibly stand there and say that he is supporting people who are struggling when a facility has closed after 20 years of supporting vulnerable women. The Government was involved. E-mails that were published in the newspaper article today said that the tendering of 218 was with relevant ministers for a view and that another e-mail referred to the likelihood of needing ministerial clearance for any new approach. That is in the e-mails that have been published today. During the SNP leadership contest, Humza Yousaf said, if there is more money that we can give to alcohol and drugs in particular, then that is going to be a priority focus for me. It is clear that it is not a priority. Nicola Sturgeon cut funding for drug treatment in 2015 and drug death rules. This year, Humza Yousaf has cut the treatment budget in real terms. They promised to create hundreds of new rehab beds, but they have managed just over 30. The addiction crisis in Scotland is out of control. Since the SNP came to power, drug deaths have doubled. They are the worst in Europe, and new figures show deaths are increasing again. Scotland's shame has not gone away. Nicola Sturgeon admitted that she took her eye off the ball. Hasn't Humza Yousaf done exactly the same? I reject that in its entirety. Let's try to take some of the issues that Douglas Ross mentioned in his question. Over the years, we have increased the increase of funding into drugs policy. For example, if I take 2014-15 to 23-24, that is a 67 per cent increase in funding. That is by Audit Scotland figures that were recently published. The draft budget for 2014-25 has maintained our budget for alcohol and drugs at the same level this year. This year, we have seen record funding of £113 million into alcohol and drugs partnerships. Douglas Ross references if there was more money. The point is that we have had a £500 million real terms cut to our budget by the UK Government. If, of course, Douglas Ross is able to convince his colleagues south of the border to give further funding to Scotland, then I absolutely promise him that once an alcohol policy will be one of the areas that we look to give further funding to. In terms of the action that we are taking, again, I am happy to write to Douglas Ross with more detail. We have ensured that there is greater carriage of naloxone, over 150,000 kits. We are working with Greater Glasgow City Council on more radical approaches such as a safe consumption room. We are increasing numbers of beds in residential rehab, and, as I said, we continue to work with local authorities to help to tackle the issue. I make the offer that I have already made to Douglas Ross, to others right across the chamber, that we are willing to work cross-party in order to resolve what is one of the most difficult challenges that this country has faced in an issue that has plagued our society not just for years, Presiding Officer, but for decades. I join others on wishing Muslims here and around the world Ramadan Mubarak. It is a month of fasting from sunrise to sunset, a month of reflection, thinking of those that are less fortunate, and a month of charity and our thoughts are with all those living in poverty and in conflict at this time. I must say that I will have to battle dry mouth for 10 minutes fair play to the First Minister who has to do it for 45 minutes this afternoon. It has been four and a half years since the SNP Government declared a drugs death emergency. Since then, over 5,200 lives have been lost in drug-related deaths. Every single one of them, someone's son, daughter or loved one. In 2023 alone, 1,197 people died, a 10% increase on the previous year. The response from the Drugs Minister this week was, the plan is working. However, that is what Anne-Marie Ward, the CEO of Favour UK said. They have the audacity to claim progress in this catastrophe. Their assertions are a slap in the face, a mockery of the grim reality that we witness daily. How dare they feed us at these blatant lies, expecting us to nod along while our communities are ravaged and our streets are lined with the casualties of their incompetence? Who is right? Are people impacted by drugs or the Drugs Minister? This Government continues to engage with those who have lived experience and are on their recovery journey. The Drugs Minister and I did that just this week. Just yesterday, we met with those who have lived experience and those who are going through their recovery journey, not to spin, as has been suggested, but to directly front up what is an extremely challenging issue and to say that we continue not just to listen but to act. That is what I say to Anas Arran and Douglas Ross that nobody in the Government, neither myself nor the Minister for Alcohol and Drugs and Alcohol Policy, is neither complacent nor attempting to dismiss the very serious concerns that have been raised by Douglas Ross, Anas Arwar, by Parliamentarians across the chamber and indeed by our stakeholders. However, I can point to the fact that we are taking action. For example, we are continuing to expand residential rehab and we are providing funding to community-based organisations. We are working with the likes of Glasgow City Council on more radical approaches such as for drug consumption facilities. We are not just doing the same thing, we are looking to see what more we can possibly do that is different. We are widening the access to naloxone. We are driving the mat standards. Everybody knows how important the same-day access to treatment is and can be. We are working on the rights of those who have lived experience through the national collaborative. If there are particular interventions that Anas Arwar and others want us to explore and examine, I give him an absolute promise that we do so with an open mind, but nobody in government, but nobody—not me nor the drugs minister—is downplaying what is one of the most serious issues that our country is facing. Anas Arwar is a repeated action of this Government where we focus a lot on the inputs but we do not look at the outcomes of Government policy because what matters here is the outcomes. The outcome is more people losing their lives to drugs. In Tayside, 83 people died last year. In Edinburgh, it was more than two a week and in Glasgow, it was six people a week. In January 2021, the Government set out targets to increase residential rehab beds. It promised 225 more beds by 2026 and three years on, only 32 are operational. In 2022, the Government said it would establish drug-checking facilities but two years on, no facilities are open and not a single licence application has been made. In what world does the First Minister think that this plan is working and how can he expect families who have lost loved ones to believe him when there does not seem to be any sense of urgency? I reject the accusation that there is no sense of urgency. There absolutely is a sense of urgency. Anas Arwar started his question by asking what the outputs were. He is absolutely right, but the outputs are important. There is an increase in residential rehab beds, and I will come back to the very specific point that Anas Arwar made shortly. The outputs of our actions mean that we have now better standards, more urgent standards when it comes to access to treatment. The outcomes are that we now have more than 150,000 naloxone kits that have been distributed. We know from Police Scotland figures that naloxone has been used around about 500 times, which undoubtedly has saved lives. That is an outcome and an output. Of course, in terms of checking facilities for drugs, my understanding is that they require a home office licence. That is why we continue to work with Glasgow City Council and indeed engage with the UK Government in that regard. In relation to the point that Anas Arwar makes, we are on track to meet our targets in relation to increased capacity of residential rehab. The investment that we have made is in eight capacity projects that will provide an additional 172 beds by 2526. The further funding that we will provide in 2526, we are very confident of meeting that 650 target by the end of the parliamentary term. I can give a breakdown in detail in writing, if Anas Arwar wishes, of the investments that we have made in residential rehab, but we are confident of not just meeting that target and output, but also the output of having 1,000 publicly funded rehab placements by, again, at the end of the parliamentary term. The outcome that matters is that drugs deaths should be falling, not increasing. That is the outcome that really matters here, because despite everything that the First Minister has said, we have the exact same drug laws as everywhere else in the UK, but almost three times as many drugs deaths here in Scotland. The outcome that we need this Government to deliver is fewer people dying from drugs, not more and more people dying every year, because it has been four and a half years since the SNP Government declared a drugs death emergency, three years since the launch of their national mission to reduce drug deaths, and almost two years since the final report of the drugs death task force. However, in the last year, 1,197 more people have died. Incompetence has consequences. It means that Scotland has the highest rate of drugs deaths in Europe, and across Scotland families are grieving loved ones whose deaths were preventable. However, this Government has failed on every promise it has made, promises to increase rehab beds falling behind, promises on drug checking facilities not delivered, promises on new treatment standards broken, but all we have heard today are more of those exact same promises that are not being delivered and about a plan that is not working. Drug deaths are going up, not coming down, so I will give them one last chance. What will he change to get a grip of this crisis and help to save lives in Scotland? We know that there are many parts of the world and, of course, right across the United Kingdom in particular, where there are challenges with synthetic opioids, nitazines, fentanyl and so on and so forth, which are more addictive and more potent, and therefore are causing real harm and real concern right across the United Kingdom. That is why Anasar and Douglas Ross were both right to say that the levels of drug deaths in Scotland are unacceptable on per head of the population higher than other parts of the UK, but we have, of course, seen increases in England and Wales. I suspect that it is largely down to the same issues that we are collectively facing that we are seeing more addictive substances on our streets such as synthetic opioids. I say once again to Anasar that not only are we taking action, he says that promises have been broken around increasing residential rehab, they are not. I am giving Anasar the evidence, the detail and the facts that the levels, the numbers of residential rehab beds have increased and we are on track to meet our commitment towards the end of the Parliament, the same for publicly funded rehab places. I can give an absolute guarantee, I promise to not just those in the chamber, but those that are listening, that where we can try innovative approaches, new approaches, then we will absolutely seek to do that. That is why we are supporting Glasgow with funding for their safer consumption room, it is why we are supportive of checking facilities for drugs and other interventions as well. If we did have the power over the misuse of drugs acts, for example, we would seek to make changes in relation to the decriminalisation of drugs for personal use and we would explore that issue because all that intervention has worked in other countries. I end, where I started. The Government acknowledges the scale of the problem, the scale of the challenges and rededicates itself to taking further action where we can, invest where we can and work with anybody we possibly can to tackle this shameful and serious problem in our society. Question 3, Gillian Mackay. To ask the First Minister what the Scottish Government's response is to the current 40 days for life protests. First Minister, the Scottish Government believes that patients and staff should be able to access abortion services free from intimidation, free from harassment and free from undue influence. That is why we have committed to fully supporting the abortion services safe access zone Scotland bill that Gillian Mackay has introduced to the Parliament as Gillian Mackay will be more acutely aware than anyone. The bill is currently being scrutinised by the health, social care and sport committee. I extend my thanks to Gillian Mackay for introducing the bill and to all the witnesses who have provided evidence to the committee thus far. We will continue to support the bill as it makes its way through the parliamentary process and I am hopeful that its protection will soon be felt by women right across Scotland. Gillian Mackay. I thank the First Minister for that answer. Around the world in recent years we have seen reproductive rights go backwards in countries such as the US, Poland and Brazil, but there are glimmers of hope with rights expanding in Argentina and Colombia and the rights and abortion being enshrined in the constitution in France. Does the First Minister agree with me that safe access zones must be the first stop on advancing rights here in Scotland and does he believe that we should go further, including progressing, providing abortion in Scotland up to the legal limit, ensuring equitable access to IVF and removing abortion from criminal law? First and foremost, I want to be clear that provisions and regulations of NHS abortion services within specifying term limits should absolutely be a clinical matter and not a criminal one. I am happy to look at that issue in further details. I know that there are nuances and complexities in looking into that issue and opening up that issue, which again I am happy to discuss with the member in due course. There have, of course, been improvements in the provision of later stage abortions within Scotland, with all mainland boards now providing abortion to at least 20 weeks gestation, but Gillian Mackay is right to push the Government and health boards to see what can be done even further in terms of later term abortions. I am happy to ensure that the health secretary writes to her with further details of the actions that we are taking alongside health boards in that regard. Once the bill has made its way through Parliament to the Mackay's bill, we will begin a review of abortion law, which will focus on identifying potential proposals for reform. John Mason Thank you. Would the First Minister not accept that no one is being harassed at these vigils or protests? No one is being intimidated. It is largely a small group of elderly, religious people standing at these facilities. Does he not think that we are slightly overreacting with legislation on this? I wouldn't agree with John Mason on that. I am afraid. I think that what is so important in this matter, particularly for men, is to listen to the voices of women. Women have given very powerful evidence and testimony that whatever John Mason's view may be, that they feel that harm is being done, that they feel harassed and that they feel intimidation. Even if John Mason was to, for whatever reason, discard that evidence, and I would encourage him not to, he should also listen to the clinicians at the services. The likes of Dr Greger, Irwin and many others who have spoken very powerfully about the impact that it is also having on staff. John Mason knows that I am a religious person myself. I pray. However, wherever you choose to pray, you can pray anywhere in the world for whatever you want. Why do you have to go to an abortion service where women feel harassed and intimidated? I have to say that I do not understand. Therefore, I believe that legislation that Gillian Mackay is bringing forward is one that should have the support of this whole Parliament. We will certainly be supporting it from the Scottish Government. I would say once again to John Mason that it is so crucial that, as opposed to men, perhaps imposing their view on what the impact that affects on protests are to women, that John Mason would do well to listen to the voices of women and clinicians and staff at abortion services. Those protesters are intimidating for women at what is undoubtedly a challenging moment in their lives. Given the waiting-list pressures across the NHS, can I confirm if he has had direct discussions with health boards to ensure that women can continue to access the abortion services in a safe but, of course, a timely manner to avoid adding further anxiety to what is already a challenging time in their lives? Karen Watkins is absolutely right to raise this issue. We do not want anybody waiting longer than they have to for accessing healthcare, particularly because we know that a range of issues that affect women, in particular the way that is far too long, in relation to the discussions that have been had between the Government and health boards, on a range of issues that affect abortion access to abortion services, and perhaps some of the issues that were raised by Gillian Mackay, which Karen Watkins might have an interest in in terms of later term abortion. I am more than happy for the health secretary to write a detailed note to Karen Watkins, but she is absolutely right to raise the issues that she does because nobody, particularly women accessing health services, should not have to wait a minute longer than I am afraid they currently do. Question 4 has been withdrawn. To ask the First Minister what action the Scottish Government will take in response to reported statistics showing that nearly one in five probationary teachers left the teacher induction scheme in 2023. The teacher induction scheme is an important element of teacher education. It guarantees every eligible student teacher a one-year probation placement to allow them to meet the standard for full registration. Probation numbers fluctuate throughout the year due to deferos, due to withdrawals, and that can be for a variety of reasons, including medical or indeed personal reasons or extensions to the original initial teacher education qualification. The strategic board for teacher education, which is made up of a range of key education stakeholders, is looking at issues around teacher recruitment, increasing support for early career teachers and also raising the profile of teaching as a valued profession. Jamie Greene I agree that it does fluctuate, but before Covid the drop-out rate was 13 per cent. Last year it was near 19 per cent, so it is an alarming rise at First Minister. EIS believes that what is happening is that once teachers enter the workplace they are just facing the harsh realities that many in the profession have known for some time, increased workload, less support for teachers and pupils, and of course a lack of permanent secure jobs for many probationary teachers. Of course on top of that is rising violence and abuse towards teachers, something which I think concerns all of us. We already know that since the First Minister's own party took office there are 1,000 fewer teachers in Scotland's classrooms and we know the direct impact that has on both subject choice and class sizes themselves. So my question is this First Minister, why does he personally think that so many probation teachers are dropping out of the profession so early in their career, but more importantly what is his government doing about it? Jamie Greene is of course right to raise what is an important issue, one that will have cross-party interests. I think that many of the reasons that Jamie Greene gives for some of the reasons that we might see deferos or indeed withdrawals from teaching are absolutely right, and the issues around violence in schools is an issue in particular that is high in our mind and high in the mind of the teaching profession. Again, I am happy for the education secretary to write to Jamie Greene with details of the actions that we are taking from, of course, the summits that have taken place, the guidance and the guidelines that we have provided schools and the support that we are providing in tackling that particular issue. We are also trying to ensure that teaching is an attractive profession. One way that we are doing that, for example, is ensuring that teachers in Scotland are the best paid in the UK in terms of starting salary, starting salary being the most attractive in the UK. We also have a number of bursaries that we are also providing for STEM subjects, but also for those teachers who are willing to complete the probation anywhere in Scotland. There is the preference waiver scheme, which means that teachers can receive up to £8,000 if they are willing, as I say, to complete the probation anywhere in Scotland. We are also working with stakeholders on a joint campaign to encourage people to consider teaching as an attractive profession. There are a range of issues that we are working on, and again, more than happy for the education secretary to write to Jamie Greene with further detail of the actions that we are taking. To ask the First Minister what urgent action is being taken to address long waits in A&E departments in light of reports that more than 7,300 patients waited for more than a day in 2023, with some waiting much longer. I emphasise that all long waits are acceptable. We continue to work hard with health boards to reduce delays for patients. Any performance is impacted by pressures from right across the wider health and social care system, which is why our unscheduled care collaborative programme is taking a very whole-systems approach as we work with health boards in delivering sustained improvement. Through the programme, a whole range of actions are being taken to improve patient flows to reduce A&E delays. Those include actions to strengthen arrangements to avoid unnecessary hospital admissions, such as same-day emergency care services, expanding our hospital-at-home services and optimising flow navigation centres, and supporting patients to ensure that they receive the right care in the right place in trying to reduce the pressure on our very busy acute sites. I thank the First Minister for his response, but in Esher and Arran, one patient waited at A&E for 122 hours. That is five days. At Borders General it was 88 hours. In NHS Lanarkshire someone waited over 72 hours. Consultants tell me that patients are being treated on trolleys in corridors when they should be in a bed. Let's be in no doubt that those long waits are costing lives. First Minister, do not take my word for it. The Royal College of Emergency Medicine estimates that there were up to 2,000 excess deaths last year, caused by patients waiting over eight hours in emergency departments. That, frankly, is the national scandal. What action will be taken now to tackle long waits at A&E departments before more lives are lost? I am not disputing with neither Jackie Baillie nor the Royal College of Emergency Medicine that there is undoubtedly a relationship between long waits and increased risk of harm, which is why we are absolutely committed to reducing those waits. I would say that some of the figures that were presented in the FOI were erroneous, not due to anything that Jackie Baillie has said, but I believe that, due to some coding or recording errors, nonetheless Jackie Baillie's point remains and remains correct that there are still people. Exceptionally, not the rule, but exceptionally, there are waiting far, far too long to be seen in A&E. Jackie Baillie asks what action we will be taking again. I am happy for the health secretary to write in greater detail, but I can give you some of the actions that we are taking. We are, for example, increasing bolstering our support for NHS 24, and we know by doing so that that can stop and reduce the numbers that are then going to A&E. In fact, we have increased staffing levels by 65 per cent since 2007. NHS 24 is now a 24-7 service. We are also increasing and expanding hospital at home in this winter, providing 455 beds leading into the winter to enable more people to get treatment from home. We are also increasing staffing levels as well. In terms of A&E workforce, we are recruiting more and more A&E consultants to help again with that. Flow has been a 300 per cent increase, in fact, in A&E consultants under the SNP. One of the other things that I would draw Jackie Baillie's attention to is that we are looking to support social care, because we know how important that is to deal with the delayed discharge issue. Of course, in a few weeks' time, those who are working in social care will get a further pay-off for the development of £12 an hour. First Minister, as a GP, I see people who cannot wait any longer in that A&E queue. They come to me with chest pain. They come to me with signs of stroke. They come to me because they do not even want to get into that queue. That puts huge pressure on me in GP and on primary care. So what can you do for us in primary care to ensure that we can deal with these patients? Thank Dr Gohani for the work that he does as a GP and other GPs right across the country. We are seeking to improve any performance that has been affected and impacted undoubtedly by the global pandemic. That is a pressure that is faced by A&E services right across the UK. It is why, of course, we continue to seek to improve that A&E performance, since Scotland's A&E departments are the best performing we know in the UK and have not been for eight years. In terms of the support that we are providing, what we are looking to do is make sure that we can take some pressure away from busy acute sites or indeed we know very busy primary care sites as well. That is why we are investing in NHS 24. It is why we are investing at hospital at home as well as why we are investing in, for example, increasing staffing levels. Of course, we have a target to increase the head count number of GPs and, of course, have continued to make progress in that regard. Presiding Officer, Parliament will be aware of the concerning fire on Reddlebane Street in my constituency, where combustible cladding may have been a factor. Does the First Minister share my empathy for all those affected and my gratitude to the many firefighters and other emergency service personnel who have responded? Does the First Minister agree with me that this very worrying incident emphasises the importance of high-rise firefighting capability in urban areas and the extra funding for the fire service in the budget, and that it is vital that the Housing, Cladding and Remediation Scotland Bill and the Cladding and Remediation programme are taken forward with urgency by Parliament, Government and Developers? Yes, I agree with all that from Ben Macpherson. I also add my thanks to the emergency services in particular Scottish Fire and rescue for their efforts. Of course, those efforts saw everybody including Graham Simpson, who was there as well, evacuated safely and without injury. I am very pleased to see that. We know that this is still an evolving situation. Ben Macpherson is, of course, right and is important that we continue to fund the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service, and that is why we have seen an increase in the budget for £24.25. I also think that what Ben Macpherson says about cladding is incredibly important and that the bill that we have seen make some progress just this week continues to make progress, and all of the stakeholders who have responsibility for cladding and remediation take those responsibilities seriously. They do not have to wait for the bill in order to take action. Presiding Officer, it is two years since we lost our friend and colleague David Hill while playing for the parliamentary rugby team in Dublin. His parents, Sharon and Roger, have been an inspiration. David's father, Roger, is currently on an epic cycle journey to deliver the match ball for the annual match between the Scottish and Irish parliaments, but also to raise funds and awareness for cardiac risk in the young. Roger has been joined by friends and family for parts of the journey. He was even joined by yourself, Presiding Officer, as he left Edinburgh. Will the First Minister join me in wishing all those involved the very best of wishes and also pledge to look at any ways that his Government can introduce screening to improve outcomes for those living with an undetected cardiac condition? I join with Douglas Lumsden in congratulating Sharon and Roger. I have had the pleasure of meeting them on a couple of occasions when they were most recently at Parliament, and they are incredible. I cannot think of a worse loss than losing a child. Nobody would begrudge Sharon and Roger if they just dealt privately with that grief, but what they have chosen to do instead in David's memory is to ensure that they raise awareness of undetected cardiac issues in the young and cardiac risk in the young. For that, they absolutely deserve not just recognition, but they have the admiration of everybody right across this Parliament. I wish Roger well, certainly in the cycle, that he is doing. I will pledge to look at what further we can do possibly in relation to screening those who have undetected cardiac issues. I am more than happy for the health secretary to engage directly with Douglas Lumsden. I am sure that he would also engage with Sharon and indeed Roger on those issues. Tomorrow, the Strathclyde partnership for transport board is set to approve bus franchising as part of the regional bus strategy, but the Scottish Government has cut SPT's capital budget for the coming year to zero. That cut will hamper SPT's ability to take our buses back under public control and deliver a better bus service for all of Greater Glasgow. Does the First Minister welcome the bus franchise for Greater Glasgow? If so, will he make sure that SPT has the funding that is necessary to ensure that it can be launched as soon as possible? Of course, under legislation that was brought forward by the Scottish National Party Government, that bus franchising is possible. We are very pleased that we have been able to enable that to take place at a local level. On our funding for local government, I remind the member that we are giving an increase in budget to our local authorities. We are always happy to continue to engage with our local authorities, with their partners such as SPT, to see what more we can do in order to ensure that our public transport is as accessible and affordable as possible. For transport, we will be bringing a debate forward to this Parliament in relation to the fair fair's review, which I believe will be debated with the agreement of Parliament without motion to have that really good discussion, I hope, on what further we can do in order to ensure that public transport, be it buses, be it railways or any other form of public transport, is as accessible and affordable as possible. Does the First Minister share my extreme disappointment that Scotland will not be included in the UK Government's horizon legislation announced this week? Can he outline the steps that the Scottish Government is taking to write the injustice imposed on those living in Scotland and who were profoundly affected by the post office horizon scandal? I do absolutely share that sentiment from Audrey Nicholl. The Deputy First Minister has written to the UK Government to urge them to reconsider their decision, as has the First Minister and Deputy First Minister of Northern Ireland. There is a real frustration. We stated very publicly our preference for that legislation to apply UK-wide. It would have been the fairest way, the most equitable way, to ensure fair treatment for sub-postmasters and mistresses in Scotland, as well as across the UK. The concern now is that, of course, we will bring forward Scottish-specific legislation if the UK Government does not change its position, but that Scottish legislation would have to align with the UK legislation, and that UK legislation is going to have to make its way through the UK Parliament. It will undoubtedly be amended through the various stages of the parliamentary process, and that will inevitably have an impact on our ability to introduce legislation. We hope that that will not have an impact on Scottish sub-postmasters and mistresses being able to access UK-wide compensation and payment that they are overdue. We will bring forward Scottish-specific legislation, but I urge the UK Government to treat sub-postmasters and mistresses in Scotland the same as they are treating sub-postmasters and mistresses in England and Wales. I recently met a constituent of mine in Glasgow, called Michaela Hola, who told me about the serious concerns that she has for her artistic son and non-verbal son Logan. At five years old, he is due to start school in August. It is quite clear that, due to his development delay and other challenges relating to autism, he will be unable to cope in a mainstream school. The pediatricians, neurologists and other medical professionals who know Logan agree. However, Glasgow City Council has declared that no alternatives are available to Logan, and he must start mainstream school later this year, and there is no route for appeal to contest that. It is a totally unacceptable situation that risks harming Logan and causing his family considerable anxiety. Can I ask that the First Minister works with me to look again at this case to see if a more suitable alternative for this vulnerable young boy can be found? Of course, I am more than happy for Annie Wells to furnish me and the Government with the detail of Logan's case, with Logan's mother's Michaela's permission. If she does, we will happily consult with the local authority about the decisions that are made locally. It is important that we take on board the expert clinical opinion locally, and that is where the issue is perhaps concerning, because Annie Wells is suggesting from her question that those clinical opinions are not being taken into account. If Annie Wells could furnish me and the Government with the details of Logan's case with permission from Michaela, we will look into that and see if we can be of any assistance whatsoever. March is brain tumour awareness month. I thank the First Minister for agreeing to join in the brain tumour research where a hat day photo call immediately after MFQs, and I hope that all MSPs here will be able to join us too. Brain tumours kill more children and adults under the age of 40 than any other cancer, despite the devastating impact that this area of cancer research is underfunded, with more than 150 different types of brain tumour. What can the First Minister say about increasing funding to find improved treatments and ultimately find cures? I thank Beatrice Wishart for all her efforts in that regard. I look forward to the photo call shortly after First Minister's questions. I also thank all those who seek to use their own experiences to speak out about brain tumours and the need to be cautious and conscious of raising awareness of any getting support where necessary. We are needed, and I think of the case of Glenn Campbell, particularly the BBC journalist well-known right across the chamber, who has used his experience and his voice to raise awareness of brain tumours. I also say to Beatrice Wishart again that I am more than happy for the health secretary to write her with further details, but we are increasing funding to the NHS this year. Over £19.5 billion worth of funding to the NHS, record funding to the NHS and I know just how seriously tackling all cancers, including of course tackling neurological cancers, brain cancer, is to our NHS colleagues right across the country. That concludes First Minister's questions. The next item of business is a member's business to be in the name of Karen Adam, and there will now be a short suspension to allow those leaving the chamber and public gallery to do so before the debate begins.