 Thank you. Mr. Lewis, I know your organization also is advocated for these types of networks. Do you wanna add anything to that? Well, I certainly agree with Mr. Chilo. The choice of different types of builds is important for local communities so that they can take the risk that is appropriate to their community's needs. Let me ask you this, Mr. Lewis. You talk about digital redlining in your testimony. How can legislation like the accessible, affordable Internet for All Act, the Lift America Act, and the American Jobs Plan address digital redlining? I think if the bill includes options for the subsidies or that funding to go to local governments or local co-ops, it can certainly also help with redlining. As Mr. Chilo said, those communities usually are better at making sure that everyone is served because they live in those communities or those government officials live in those communities and so they would have incentive to make sure that whatever is built is built to everybody. Ms. Cheney, do you wanna add anything to that? Sorry. No, I think the other witnesses answered it appropriately. Okay. Well, let me go back to Mr. Lewis then. In your testimony, you talked about the need for a permanent broadband benefit and the need for additional majors to increase affordability long-term. Do you think that we can close the digital divide over the long-term without addressing those issues? I'm concerned that we won't. The cost of broadband right now, just from what we see from the numbers of how many options that people have is really driven by monopoly or duopoly prices. I think that doing the work to study the prices and the cost of broadband long-term so that we can really determine the impact of the market and if that cost is actually affordable or if it's simply the cost that's going up and up based on the choices of industries is critically important. We've already seen the last few years of 20% rise in broadband costs according to FCC data that's far ahead of inflation. So these prices needed to be studied.