 So you speak about, you know, the open-source era, you speak about autocratic leadership in the same breath. Yes. But aren't open-source systems and movements leaderless? I mean, you want to talk about... Say that again. Isn't it leaderless? We live in this new era, yeah. Open-source systems. Aren't they leaderless? Isn't that the point? It's, that's a great, great, great question, which is that open-source by its very nature is leaderless. The Linux system, as opposed to a Windows system or an Oracle system, is open-source and there is no leader. Hobbyists anywhere in the world can create updates, right? And nobody and everybody maintains the Linux system. The Arab Spring, there was no clear leader. Open-source movement, right? Cryptocurrency, we don't even know who created it. Is that guy, that Japanese name, one person open? People we don't know. Right. Hang on. So, sorry. You're right. We don't know who started Blockchain or Bitcoin. So, where then does autocracy in terms of leadership, as it relates to that, come into it? Or is it only for those who use it thereafter? So, that's what I was coming to. So, it sounds like whether it's Linux system, whether it's movements like the Arab Spring, whether it's cryptocurrency, these open-source phenomena are leaderless, right? And then, her question is why are you talking about not just leadership, the need for leadership, but that too autocratic, strong leadership, right? It's a very legitimate question. When I, as I think about this, initially it sounds like they are two totally opposites. But as you think deeply, you realize that open-source systems, open-source movements fizzle out. They absolutely don't last. The only time Linux, right, has been around since the 1990s, correct? What's the market share of Linux? Four percent, right? And even to get from zero to four percent, it happened when a company called Red Hat said, we will be taking care of all things Linux. Pay us a fee. Don't buy the free system. Don't take the free system. Pay us a fee and we'll bring you all the updates. We'll bring you all the support. When they fill the leadership vacuum, that's when it got some traction. Arab Spring, what happened five years later? You have even worse dictatorships in certain countries. It fizzled out, right? And why after 10 years have cryptocurrencies not taken off? Because of lack of trust. Because of lack of leadership, maybe? So in the open-source era, actually, you need more stronger leadership than in... But it just depends on who defines that leadership, who defines who becomes the leader. Sure, sure. It's the people who decide who becomes the leader. Well, you have to earn the right, remember?