 The great CER call, Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research, approach provides guidance for assessing how much confidence to place in findings from systematic reviews of qualitative research or qualitative evidence synthesis. It has been developed to support the use of findings from qualitative evidence synthesis in decision making, including guideline development and policy formulation. The approach consists of five components, methodological limitations, coherence, adequacy of data, relevance and dissemination, or publication bias. Each component is evaluated separately and then combined into one overall assessment of confidence in the review finding. The resulting confidence rating can be communicated through a summary of qualitative findings table. This article was authored by Simon Lewin, Andrew Booth, Claire Glenton, and others.