 All right, so let's, I'm gonna start with the issue. I'm gonna start with the most controversial issue because it's the most fun. And plus, I think that through this issue, we can illustrate a lot of other key points. I think we can cover it. I'll just give you a sampling of what Adam, kind of the issues that Adam mentioned. Actually, I'll read you the whole list. Productivity. What kind of, where does it come from? Does it come from the man? How does, how does wealth created? Taxes, how do you tax immigration, welfare, entrepreneurism, money, prejudices, woke culture, drugs, banking, government. How do all these things, how do they play out in a society like that? And can we use that in order to learn something about the world in which we live today? Yeah, Paulo, let's call it Lezdefe Island. Great name. It's, it's, it's, maybe it's, it's, it's, even the UN now has recognized it as a nation. So it's a country, it's separate. And, you know, the dark secret, the real dark secret on Lezdefe Island is that it has three nukes. It has three nukes. One pointed to Washington, DC. One pointed at Beijing. And one pointed to Moscow. And these are stealth nukes. So they can't be shot down. These are, you know, it's, it's, it's Lezdefe Island. They've created the best nukes in the world. And they can't be shot down. So nobody is, nobody's going to invade this island because if they invade, they're going to be wiped out, right? Or at least a lot of people are going to die. So there's a kind of a mutually assured destruction understanding. And that is why it's left free. I've always argued with libertarians and with other advocates of Lezdefe Island and Crete, Crete and Island. I've always argued that the thing that you need in order to make it truly free, in order to prevent the United States from shutting it down is a nuke pointed to Washington, DC, and that way they won't touch it, all right? So we got the nukes. We're all clear. They're not invading. We've all set up. A hundred people showed up. They've each got their own expertise. They're each starting to do stuff. There's high speed, you know, fiber optical cable. So, you know, they don't have to, they don't have to, they're working by providing services outside and they're flying in and out because there's an airport. But they basically are residents and live and citizens of this island. And we're going to look at, you know, the different political issues that come out, right? I guess people are upset that we have nukes. We're going to have nukes. Lazifair Island, I'm telling you now, gold to gulch in the real world has nukes. So that's just precondition, you know, that I have set for my Lazifair Island. All right. So let's start with one of the toughies and then work away from that into some of these others because I think this is a good one to illustrate a lot of the issues and a lot of points that involve. So let's start with immigration, right? Let's start with immigration. Now remember, this is an island in which all land is private. The airport is private. The roads that are being built are private. All the land, all the homes, all the developed or undeveloped land, everything on this island is owned by somebody and let's assume that at point zero, at the beginning of it, the infrastructure's already built, all that's built, let's assume at that point zero that all the land on the island is owned by residents of the island. Now I own a house on this island and I want to employ a maid in the house, clean, cook, do all the stuff, right? And we'll get to taxation. We'll get to taxation. There's no need to taxation because there's very little the government is gonna do but we'll get to taxation and develop what I think. So let's start with immigration. So let's say I own a house on this island and I want to hire a maid and I don't want to hire anybody on the island already. All the people on the island right now are not interested in being a maid. They don't have the skill set, they're not qualified and I'm willing to pay quite a bit of money to being a maid onto the island. So I put out job ads all over the world and hire my ideal maid and fly her in. Well, does she need a visa? Granted by whom? Whose business is it? Who I hire and who's coming to work for me? They gonna stop me from hiring her? That's a violation of my rights. By what right are they gonna constrain who can come and work for me? Who can provide me with services? Is the private airport gonna have some kind of constraints? Maybe within reason but a rational island, a laissez-faire island has right of ways even on private property and the airport just can't randomly ban people from entering. So what restrictions would it be placed? On me bringing in this maid. Now, maybe the local police have a station at the airports and they screen the passengers as they come in and they just make sure that there are no criminals coming there, you know, well-known existing criminals or people that the government is looking for because they're terrorists or foxes. Make sure maybe that nobody with infectious diseases coming in, maybe they have some, these little thermometers that radiate out to make sure you're not coming with a fever now that we live in an age of infectious diseases. But other than that, what role does the government have in telling me, put aside the immigrant? Who I can, I cannot hire. And isn't it a violation of my rights to tell me no? Can't hire anybody or you can't hire people from China or you can't hire people from Ecuador or you can't hire people from Scandinavia or they have to be from Africa or whatever, right? By what standard? So no, there's no visa. A visa would say that the government has the right to restrict somebody's coming in. The government has a right to restrict how long they stay by what standard? I, a citizen of the island, have rights. I'm just part of those rights, I have a right to invite anybody into my house to hire anybody I wanna hire to work for me. How does the government get a role in placing itself between me and the people that I'm hiring, the people that are coming to work for me? So no, I mean, I hire this woman, she comes, starts working for me as a maid. Now, maybe initially she lives, I've got a spare bedroom or a separate unit and she lives there, but ultimately, let's say she wants to move into her own place. Well, now she's gonna have to go out and she's gonna have to find a place to live. She's gonna have to find something. All the land is already private. And assuming I'm not the only one who's hired some people who've come in, maybe they're not 100 people on the island anymore, maybe they're now 125, because ooh, 25% increase in the population of Ireland. That sounds scary. Maybe they're 10 new people. And maybe most of them are maids, they're not owning a huge amount of money, but maybe one of the residents on the island says, oh, I've got a empty plot of land, I can build a small apartment complex and rent it out to these immigrants and to these people coming in. And you can see that now there's, the immigrant has created production. But even before that, let me take a step back as I'm in to see this. So the immigrant arrives, she arrives, the maid arrives. She has no money, right? She's coming from a poor country. She comes with no money, she's got a job. She wants to go buy stuff. Well, she can't. She has no money. So what does she need to do in order to be able to buy stuff? Well, she has to produce. She has to work. Before she actually can consume, she has to produce. Now it's true that in an arrangement like this, I would probably advance her some money under the assumption that she's going to work. So it's still the fact that she has to work in order to produce, in order to consume. So once you break it down like that, once you start with a point zero, once you start with somebody coming in who does not have anything and who's not your work, it's obvious that they can't produce anything. Sorry, they can't consume anything. They have to first produce. They have to earn a living. And this is kind of the straightforward, obvious case that production has to precede consumption. A person, an individual, and always look at economics and these kinds of principles at the individual level, my rights being violated by you not allowing me to bring in somebody to work for me. Why is it your business who I bring in? Now we'll get to some of the political issues that might be involved in this in a minute as we illustrate all these different aspects of it. So she has to work first and then she can consume. And now she's doing something productive. She's earning some money and now she can take that money and go and consume. And her consumption now is gonna shift the mix of things that were consumed on this island before. Let's assume now they're 10 maids. They might consume different things than the owners of the home. And that'll create demand for those things which might result in somebody on the island producing the things that she consumed. But it might also just result in the store owner now shifting what he buys or imports from another country. From the United States, let's say. But what he's gonna import is gonna be determined by his assessment of what his customers want or his assessment of what he can sell his customers on, what he can convince his customers to buy. And as there ever circumstances where on this island you could imagine the government or me or any one of us because remember the government at the end of the day is us, particularly on a small island with a small number of people. It's us. Well, we say to this guy and said, you have to buy from these people. You cannot buy from those people or if you buy from those other people, you're gonna have to pay a tax. You're gonna have to pay us for it. How would that ever, how would anybody imagine doing that? Where would that come from in a rights respecting society? What right would any of us have to tell him, you can't buy stuff from Ecuador. You can only buy stuff from Columbia. If you buy from Ecuador, we're gonna tax you. Now we could say as individuals, you know what, if you buy stuff from China, let's say, I'm not gonna buy it. And now we'll shift his behavior under no circumstances. Do I have the right to tax him for buying from some producer and not buying from others and penalizing him? I mean, that as Wanda Freeman says in the chat, that's like the mafia. So you can, you can start seeing how you could never imagine, you could never conceive of an idea of tariffs on this world. You could never conceive of real limitations and immigration on this world, in this world. I mean, because it's such a clear violation of individual rights, of the rights of the people. I'm not talking about the rights of Chinese producers. I'm not talking about the right of the immigrant coming in. I'm just talking about the rights of the hundred people who live on the island. And you can see, of course, that these people, as they come in because they're starting, in a sense, from zero, they're starting with nothing, they have to work in order to be able to consume. No other way, unless they're giving gifts. But where does the gift come from? It comes from the work of whoever provided the gift. The end of the day, wealth has to be produced, has to be worked for. Somebody has to do it. Whether it's the person who gives you the gift or whether it's you, somebody has to do the productive work in order to make that money come into existence. We'll get to money in a little bit. Money's complicated on an island with a hundred people. Yeah, maybe not. All right, well, it is complicated, but we'll see how complex we want to get into it. Now, let's say the maid is not working out. She's no good. And I fire her. Well, now what? Well, she can stay on the island and look for another job, or she can leave and look at the rest of the world. Go back where she came from or go somewhere else. Act that she is on my island. The fact that she lives here, if she has a apartment and everything. How does that give her a claim against the income and the wealth of other people on the island? She came here. She did her job. I don't need her anymore. Maybe she did a good job, or she did a bad job. But for whatever reason, I don't need her anymore. She can just claim, well, I'm here, pay me to stay. I mean, if somebody wants to out of the goodness of their heart, they certainly can. Don't see why anybody would. Unless, you know, maybe she got into an accident while working for me, now she can't work for me anymore. I'd feel bad about that. I might have helped supportive for a while on kind of a charity basis, but assuming nothing's happened. She just can't find work, it doesn't want to work. But what right? By what right does she lay a claim on other people's wealth and other people's income? So you can see welfare. Welfare is just that. I mean, it's not about millions of people. It's about one person who's lost their job or never has worked. And now because they're alive and because they're here, they demand that somebody feed them, clothe them, house them, buy them an iPhone. Why? Why should anybody? Oh, she can certainly, maybe she's saved up for money, maybe she can buy a store and open a store. Maybe she can buy a plot of land and you know, maybe she can do something productive on the island, I'm not kicking you out. But her more responsibility to her life is to figure out where she can be productive, where she can go, where she can live. But that's her responsibility to her life, not mine or the hundred people on the island's responsibility. Again, welfare would never arise. There would be charity, charity primarily, I think focused on the people who bad things have happened to, bad luck, house burned down, maybe there was an insurance. I got sick, you know, they did something that destroyed the capacity to earn for a while. So you can see how welfare is, you know, it just doesn't, again it doesn't arise. There's no context in which it would be created. And it's obvious, the violation of rights. You know, somebody literally has to go around to all the hundred people on the island with a gun, you know, and say, give me your money, I'm gonna put you in jail. Give me your money, I'm gonna put you in jail. And what are you gonna use the money for? The people might ask, well, Iran's maid was fired and she doesn't have any money to live on, so we're gonna give it to her. I mean, most people would look at this person with kind of a weird look at you threatening to put me in jail, she could take my money to give to some stranger, why is this my problem? Why does this have anything to do with me? So there's no welfare on this island. There cannot be any welfare on the island. Again, people who establish such an island who have self-esteem, who respect their own productive ability and therefore their own wealth, their own, what they have done in order to, they're not just gonna give it away under the threat of a gun, they're not gonna allow politicians to reach a state where they could put a gun to them. Of course, there are very few politicians on an island of a hundred. Maybe there's one, he's the judge, he's the sheriff, maybe he's not the judge and the sheriff. Maybe there are two, one is the judge, one is the sheriff and one of them also serves as president, because I don't know what else. Oh, and maybe there's a third guy whose job it is to press the button to launch the nukes, right, that's it. I don't think there's anybody else in the, there's the police, there's the military and there's the judge. And there's somebody who supervises them. For four people max, some people can double up. I think that, I think the policemen can also be the guy on the nuk button. I think that's fine, right. So it's a pretty cool, you know, so you don't get welfare because you can't imagine the mechanism by which you would arise. Now, how do you fund these four political guys? How do you fund the policemen? And, you know, the nukes need maintenance, they're probably fairly expensive. You know, there's a whole technology, you have to keep them updated. You know, I don't think we're gonna test any on the island, but you certainly need to keep the nukes maintained. I mean, it needs to be kept as a credible threat. So how do you fund this? We've just talked about tariffs, you can't have tariffs. So how do you fund this, right? The three salaries maybe, and maintenance of the nukes, and maybe a police car, and something like that, that's about it. Well, you know, it's an objectivist-inspired island, so we don't believe in coercion, and we don't believe in force. She can't coerce this. So you basically, once a year, the people in charge say, okay, here's our budget. We need X amount of money. We need a million bucks. Not only a hundred people in the island. Is that reasonable, you know? We need a million bucks to run. It's high on a capital basis, because there are not a lot of people, and we have three nukes. So what do we do? How are we gonna raise this million dollars? Well, they basically make it a fundraiser. They tell people, look, you want a police, you want the military, you want these nukes, you want to keep it, they appeal to people's self-interest. Well, this is how much it costs, and you can contribute whatever you want when I'm gonna force you, and we're gonna advertise a list of how much everybody has given, right, online. On the, I don't know, we're gonna post it in the local Bogosi store, whatever. It's like Super Chat, exactly. It's a Super Chat. And everybody's name is gonna be on there and how much money you gave. So like, if somebody gives the whole million, the rest of us feel a little uncomfortable, because wait a minute, in a sense, he's buying up the whole government apparatus. We don't like anybody to have that much influence. And maybe even the Constitution says no one person could give more than X percentage of the total proceeds, 10% or whatever the total proceeds. We don't wanna have too much influence. But it's voluntary. And you know, one person might have a bad year at some point and no income coming in and he can't really contribute it. And you know, people are going, wait a minute, we've all paid in and you haven't paid anything. You're kind of free writing off of us. And he says, look, I apologize. It's been a bad year. I can't make it. I promise to make it up next year. And people probably say, yeah, that's fine. No problem. Cool. And maybe instead of that, the guy says, maybe the next year, he doesn't make it up. He comes up with excuses and he never makes it up. And then people say, oh, this guy's a real free writer. He's kind of a scumbag. He keeps saying he's gonna make it up and he doesn't. Now, can they force him that? No, I mean just cause somebody's a scumbag. But we start making him into a social pariah. He's not invited to parties. We discriminate against him at the grocery store. We even have a sign at the front of the grocery store if you're the owner of the grocery store, you can do this. Saying, if you haven't paid your taxes in X number of months, don't even bother coming in. So he policed it in a sense through voluntary action. But no coercion. I don't have to sell you the stuff in my grocery store. So you can see now, again, that when you have such a small function of government, when there's so little for the government to do, you don't need a lot of taxes. Taxes are relatively minor. And it's easy to make them voluntary. And it's easy to, in a sense, monitor who's paying and who's not. And you don't have to use force against those who're not paying. You just have to use some social pressure. Again, they don't have to pay and they can leave if they don't like it. But one of the features of a private society is that you can discriminate. And it's likely that in a rational private society, you would discriminate against people who are trying to free ride off of you. And not against people based on the color of their skin or the ethnicity or anything else. So, but you could, and let's say there was a racist in the town, opened up a coffee shop, put up a big sign on the door. It says no Jews allowed. Well, we believe in private property. We believe in free speech. There's nothing, there's no excuse to use violence against this person. But what can we do? We don't like it, assume we don't like it because we don't like it. We can boycott him. We can not go to the coffee shop. We can refuse him our business. We can walk a few more steps or ride in the car for a few more minutes and go to another coffee shop. I mean, I don't think the maid has to have a prepaid return ticket. The maid just, it has to be explained to her that, you know, if she leaves, she's gonna have to fund it or, you know, she'll have to find another work until she raises enough money to leave. Because there's certainly a possibility that she can start her own business in town and stay. So in terms of prejudice or culture, I think the attitude towards all that in a free society is, who cares? You wanna be prejudice? You wanna hold crazy, wacky ideas? I don't wanna have anything to do with you. I'm not gonna interact with you. And look, interaction is not just, and this is, I think, again, you can imagine this in a place with a hundred people rather than a hundred million people. But interaction is not just about friendship. Interaction is also about work. Interaction is also about trade. Interaction is also about buying and selling. I don't wanna have anything to do, and if you, this is particularly true if you understand that the world is not a zero sum game, that the world is at value added. I don't wanna have anything to do with people who advocate horrible ideas. If I lived in such a place and a communist move onto the island, they're allowed to in my world. I mean, by what right do you do a political test on my maid? None of your business when she moves in. So if you're a communist, if you're a fascist, I, as an individual, won't work for you, won't trade with you. Won't engage in business with you. How are you gonna survive? You're gonna have to leave. See, you boycott people with bad ideas. You don't use violence. You don't lose force with a legalized force because it's so-called legitimized by government or just individual force. You don't use force. There's no force in the silent. There's no coercion. There's the police that is there to retaliate. That is there only as a function of catching the crooks. All right, we've covered that banking is too hard. Let's talk about how do we keep, how do we, well, let's talk about how wealth is created on this island. Right, how do people get richer? I mean, there's 100 people, right? We've got some immigrants coming in. I think we'd have a lot of immigrants coming in, right? Because it's such a free place. People will come in and set up shop. They would start buying up land from the people who were there originally. They would break up the land at the smaller units. They'd be huge demand for that land. The value of the land would rise. People on the island who came there first, their wealth would rise as the value of the land rose because more people would want it in order to use and to live on in order to come there. Every one of the people, the first 100 people, if they started a factory or office or whatever, hired people, programmers, tech guys, whatever, those people would then have now demand for homes. God, your homes would go up. But to build those homes, you'd need construction workers. That's more immigrants coming in to build the homes. Maybe some of them go back. Maybe some of them stay. There's regular business here to build homes. And you can see how you start getting a real economy here. And then more and more people are there. Now there are 200 people, 300 people. And we need to find ways to entertain them. And yes, Netflix is nice, but wouldn't it be nice to do something in person? And maybe we start a little theater and we invite orchestras from other countries to come by and play music or bands or whatever your thing stick is or play what do you call it? Actors and to come and produce plays and people come and they do that. And we build a theater and somebody runs the theater. And you can see how the quality of life as more people come, as more interaction there is, as more specialization happens, as we begin more and more specialized people. And this, of course, is necessary. Because of the fact that immigration is open and anybody with skills, anybody with talent, anybody who has an idea of how to produce something, to make something that has a value to the people already there or who can do it remotely and produce values for other people around the world but still be then and start consuming on the island, which is, again, a value to the other people on the island. You can see how this immigration creates nothing but positives. Now it gets more crowded, so let's hope we're starting with a big island or maybe the island is an artificial island and we can keep adding modules to it and we can keep expanding it through modules and just taking over more and more and more of the sea. Who knows? You could let your imagination roll. Maybe it's a space station and we keep adding to the space. I don't know. One of the feedbacks says who does the job interview for the policeman and judge? Interesting, I don't know. I think that's the only part of the system where you actually vote. So that's where there's an election. We all do the job interview. They propose themselves. They advertise. They have suggestions about what they would do and we vote. My guess is that most of the time, they'd only be one candidate. But if that candidate got corrupted or they were doing things a little wrong or we didn't like what they were doing, then somebody else would go for the job and we would get a choice. The only context in which we're gonna vote is to vote these people in. And as the thing grows, maybe we'd need a small legislature and maybe we'd create, I mean, I think the Constitution would already do this, create some division of powers and allow for the political entity to grow but grow only in some proportion to the population. You could probably have some recall election. You could probably have a process of impeachment which would require that. I mean, this is the kind of stuff that the Constitution, Robert Stumpfield says and he's right. This is the kind of Constitution that kind of stuff the Constitution says. Is it one man, one vote? No tax, not one tax, one man, one vote. Does everybody vote? The immigrants vote? Probably not. But there are people who are just born in the island vote. I mean, I have, you know, I would argue that maybe you have to pass a test before you vote no matter whether you're an immigrant or whether you're already there. Maybe there's a certain things that only certain people can vote. I mean, this is the kind of work that needs to be done to really structure Constitution and structure the process, the details of what actually constitutes it. Yeah, there would definitely be a minimum voting age or there would be, if there's a test, as I think there should be, then you have to pass the test and the test would be really, really hard and nobody under a certain age would be able to pass it. Would there be child labor laws? Of course not. Why would there be child labor laws? Whose rights are being infringed when children go to work, deliver papers or go to the factory for that matter? There's no keyboards, there's no sharing, there's no equality. The only thing that gets voted on really is who the judge, the policeman, and the guy with the button on the nukes is. And over time, you might imagine you need a legislature because there are issues about property rights that are getting complex and you wanna be able to define them clearly and you need a legislature in order to do that and you might elect the legislature. But again, that's the Constitution, even if it's an origin, would describe the process of how this political entity would evolve so that it would take into account growth complexity of society, but always maintain the principles. Yeah, of course all drugs are legal. Again, you're not violating anybody's rights. I mean, how would you exclude drugs? What would be the criteria for excluding a drug? And who would decide? Would you now build an entire medical bureaucracy to decide which drugs are legal and which drugs are not? Would you then establish a whole police force that regulated this and supervised this and monitored what you were injecting exactly and whether it was approved or not approved? I mean, think about this again with 100 people. Let's say I wanted to buy, let's say I took some poison, Clorox, which is poison. And instead of using it to clean the floors, I injected it into myself. Is that illegal? I mean, who gets to decide that fentanyl is destructive? By what standard? Why is it my business if you want to take fentanyl? Why is it my business if you want to destroy their lives? There are lots of ways to destroy your life. Lots of ways. You could drink too much. I know a lot of people destroy their lives by drinking too much. You could eat too much. You can eat the wrong food. That would be destroy your life. You can sleep with the wrong people, have sex with the wrong people. That could destroy your life. Sugar's pretty destructive. You can gouge yourself on sugar. Yeah, fentanyl is more destructive than some of these things, less than others. Who gets to decide? Science decides. Reality decides that it's destructive. Who gets to decide which destructive things are okay for people to use and which destructive things are not okay for people to use? Why do you get to decide for me? Why isn't any of your business? Why are drugs special? Why isn't the same thing applied to food? Why isn't the same thing applied to sex? Why isn't the same thing applied to education? What if I decide that my kids are going to not get an education? I'm just gonna let them party. I'm just gonna let them roam around all day. I'm not gonna send them to school. Now, you might think I'm immoral. You might boycott me. You might not wanna sell me stuff in your grocery store because you think that I'm not raising my kids appropriately. But it's none of your business. None of your business. I wonder if you guys are getting detail. Who records property, records? At the beginning, it's the policeman or the president or whatever. And over time, you create a property registry, a patent registry. You do all the things that a full government needs. And again, all of that is in the constitution. It gives the government authority, the constitution does to have these things. But you can see that once you ball it down to 100 people living in a place, it's, I think, clearer to see. And this is the point I think Adam was trying to get us to. It's clearer to see how these things work. Yeah, it's a function of the courts. That's why it's the policeman or the judge. The judge, I guess, would do it. Judges doesn't have a lot of work to do. So it matters what to double up and do more than one thing. And yeah, some of the registration would cost money and that's some of the way to pay the judge his salary. There are a variety of different ways in which the government provides certain services that can be charged for. But not everything can be charged for. So you can see that in, on a small scale, we can understand how this works and how rights are protected and how it seems unimaginable and unthinkable to violate somebody's rights. Drugs can make people like animals, absolutely. And if the animal misbehaves, then there's a jail and you penalize people for their actions that violate other people's rights. You don't penalize people for, let's say it makes you act like an animal, but you, before you take the drug, you build a room, a padded room in your house and for now you act like an animal inside the padded room, you can't get yourself out of it. And why do I care? I care if you're going into my property and abusing it. I care if you're driving like a maniac on the road and placing the risk of other people infringing on the rest, plus the roads are private, so I can set the rules of how you drive on my road. So I care about what you do and I don't let you off the hook because you're under the influence. Maybe the penalties are even harsher if you commit a crime under the influence than if you didn't commit a crime under the influence. I don't know, these are the kind of things you'd have to work out as legal philosophy. Now here's Adam. This is great you're on. You can also see how quickly it goes bad if the fall left or the fall right was suddenly in charge of this prosperous island. Yeah, I mean you could see it immediately. If you start taxing people, if you start using coercion, if you start banning certain behaviors like even drugs, it starts with drugs and then it goes to banning discrimination. And then it starts saying, okay, well, we're gonna take your money to help the fire made. And then we're gonna say, wait a minute, I don't like you building these condominium buildings right next to my property. I want some zoning, I want some planning. And you can see once you accept even a odor of force, once you accept even for the sake of protecting people from themselves, protecting them from drugs, once you accept a little bit of force, the whole thing deteriorates. The whole thing goes away. Thank you for listening or watching the Iran Book Show. If you'd like to support the show, we make it as easy as possible for you to trade with me. You get value from listening, you get value from watching, show your appreciation. You can do that by going to iranbookshow.com slash support by going to Patreon, subscribe star locals and just making a appropriate contribution on any one of those channels. Also, if you'd like to see the Iran Book Show grow, please consider sharing our content and of course, subscribe, press that little bell button right down there on YouTube so that you get an announcement when we go live. And for those of you who are already subscribers and those of you who are already supporters of the show, thank you. I very much appreciate it.