Loading...

MoonFaker: Chang'e 3, Clementine & Apollo

11,172 views

Loading...

Loading...

Transcript

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading...

Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Published on Mar 7, 2014

I was wondering how the propagandists would respond to my previous video, which proved that the chemistry of the lunar soil (according to Chang'e 3's x-ray spectral data) is vastly different to the Apollo soil and rock.

Vincent McConnell responded with DMCA abuse. Apparently, he thinks he owns the copyright to a public domain NASA photograph by Kevin Rohrer of retired space shuttles Enterprise and Discovery.
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/mu...

Another individual claimed that the ridiculously high titanium of the Chang'e 3 soil was expected and detected in advance by the UVVIS data from Clementine. In actuality, the UVVIS data never registered anything greater than 10% by weight with the Chang'e 3 site being in a 3% TiO2 location. The Clementine data is directly contradicted by Chang'e 3's x-ray spectral data, which shows titanium oxide contents close to 40%.

Loading...

Advertisement
When autoplay is enabled, a suggested video will automatically play next.

Up next


to add this to Watch Later

Add to

Loading playlists...