 You've also given presentations on best author preparation strategies. You've worked closely with authors, working with them, incorporate quality leads or address inconsistencies. What points should authors keep in mind when submitting their manuscripts to journals, like your repeated journals, to avoid inefficiencies and have better manuscript quality? Great. I think when an author is considering a journal to which to submit his or her manuscript, I think the person should try to get a good sense of what that journal publishes. What's sort of the scope of the article types that they publish? What type of articles do they publish? And can that author see their manuscript fitting in to that journal? Does it fit? So that's the first thing. And then I think an author really needs to look at the instructions for authors carefully. This can definitely be a daunting task because instructions for authors, including our own, can be quite lengthy. So they can be quite dense and difficult to get through. But if the journal has some sort of checklist that accompanies it, that can often be helpful. But it is worthwhile to maybe read through those instructions and maybe make some notes because that will just help you create a cleaner manuscript and one that's more apt to get through that initial screen. So I think that's what people are really looking for at the outset. By people, I mean ourselves in the editorial office, we're looking for, at the very basic level, does it have a cover letter? Does it have a title page? Does it have all of those big elements that we've asked for in the cover letter? And then it's the editor's job to determine whether or not he or she thinks that the manuscript is within the scope of the journal. But I think authors can help themselves by having knowledge of that journal and getting an understanding of what they publish and getting a feel for it and then accompanying that with a good review of the instructions for authors. And I think that can be very helpful.