 the topic of today is the topics of Tangut. So, everyone knows Tangut so much. This is general information for Shishita dynasty. It is located here in the northwest area of China. This is the main city of Shishita dynasty. From here, I will start. The Tangut language, as you know well, belongs to the Tibet Barbarian language group. It was written in Tangu script. And the Tangut language has unique features, not found in both old Tibetan and old Chinese. And this is the general information from Taipozi. Tangut belongs to so-called subject-object Barbarian language. And actually, also, the Tangut has so complicated verb threads in some cases. For example, prefix including negative, perfect, and something. And after that verb stem and auxiliary verb, pronominal suffix, especially for pronominal suffix and particle. So, for the presentation today, I explained just prefix and suffix in Tangut language. So, this is the main verb, ending verb stem and auxiliary verb. That consists of the verb threads. And prefix and pronominal suffix. In some cases, there are some particles. And as you know well, the prefix divides it into two series. The prefix one, we say, the first series of the prefix is that indicates the direction of the action or the direction of the affected aspect. And prefix series two, we say prefix two. The second series, it represents the obstative mood, meaning. Finally, this pronominal suffix. The first and second person and ruler. It's a general opinion. Okay, from here, I explained the set of the verb threads. As you know, Tangut has so several kinds of prefix series. And the prefix works series one and two. Generally, to say, they have the same initials. And they have some kind of correspondence between prefix one and two, phonetically. So, please remember this prefix one. I say it from my deconstruction. It's a key. So, this is the rear samples. It means the case marker. And this is the prefix one. And this is main power. From here, I say the powers are underlined. And the element in question. So, I emphasize it by red card. So, actually, it's not so easy to decide the direction of the motion. But here, probably I suggest this meaning to the speaker. So, he went into the castle. And second, of course, you know, but this is one of the table, the table of the set of independent forms and suffixes of Tangut polynomials. So, this independent form, the sound and characters say suffix. And so, it's divided into first and second and third. And plural, it's not individual form for polynomial. But, I mean, so, after the noun, this kind of the moving. This means plural. And probably it's corresponded to the suffix of the bar. And here, so, the professor, the right professor, Nishida Tatsuo, he, in his proposal, the agent dual. So, some suffix indicating. So, now, from here, we test. But just we show this kind of above agreement. So, it's a popular grammatical parameter in the Tibetan language. For example, first character is the top of the sentence. And the last character is same and same sound. And that means it gets out of the way. And in this sentence, so, this kind of the agreement, so, independent form between independent form and so, the suffix form. So, we return to this time loop morphic query. Actually, it has various functions. First, so, I say it belongs to prefix series one. I mean direction of action or property. And in some case, in particular compounds, it shows some case markers. Above suffix making a dual of the agent. So, now, we will so attest it. Actually, so, this morphine in the previous dictionaries, I think not quite enough for explanation for this morphine. For example, in Professor Kuchanov. So, so, this rubber and grammatical word. It's all. And also in Professor Liu Fanwen, it's probably same, not enough for the explanation. And from here, we use, I use for my previous reconstruction. This, the large, the initial I means, so, neutral, high value. So, it is same as Professor Gong's key and Professor Nishida's key. Here are the samples from given by Professor Nishida Tatsu. So, actually, first, I disagreed with his idea. Why? I explained. So, I analyzed the samples with one. So, mainly this A and B. This is the correspondent by word by word. So, please see this sentence A. Which element, the element in question is here. Actually, after bound, after bound. But is it suffix? We cannot decide it. Because here, the final, the final character means it's also bound. And sentence number B is also after bound, after bound. Okay. But why Professor Nishida decided to suffix? It's possible. So, as a prefix of the final bound, I think. So, in these cases, so, I cannot read with him. So, because we cannot decide it, prefix or suffix. At least in these short samples, we cannot explain it. Next. Yeah, probably so, in C and E, this is the correspondence of word by word. Yeah, after this underline by Professor Nishida. And the sequence, it's as a verb phrase of this sentence. After bound, yeah, we can observe this element. But actually, in sentence number C and E. So, this is my following for the meaning. So, Professor Nishida's sample has no agent inside this sentence. No, I mean, no subject so appears here. Only D, we can see, we can observe probably agent or object. Yeah, I explained it. This is the sentence. So, father, mother, and so, first class singular and plural and case marker. Okay, this is the verb phrase. The meaning of this sentence. Our father and mother should permit us to leave our household, right? So, this root point means subject. And this green point, object. Which pair is dual? So, we can decide it. Father and mother, a pair. And this one. So, but probably in the sentence, it means the object. This sentence. So, in my previous expression, the samples given by Professor Nishida, I think so weak. But in my previous work, so, I can observe such kind of phenomena. The first thing is the sentence number three. So, in this case, we can observe, after bug, after bug, after bug. So, we can observe this element. But this sample, this means our interpretation were supra. So, that was how to say, block-printed style. And in my previous work, I thought it was a mistake of the arrangement of the blocks. So, and after then, I tried to find more proper samples for denying Professor Nishida. But unfortunately, unfortunately, I found the proper example. So, I must have to apologize to Professor Nishida-sensei. So, in this sentence, clearly, you need to find two persons inside this sample sentence. So, in this sentence, first, two characters mean, so, we. So, first singular and plural as next, two persons apparently. And after bug, we can find this element. After then, so, I analyzed my previous samples. So, in all cases, the subject, this kind of, of course, I can find it in the contents, in the text. So, that we, that we, that means two of us, I think, in my previous samples, such as this one. Next one is same. So, this sentence, the sentence without a subject in this short samples. But actually, the real subject of this sentence, this is the two of us. So, of course, basically, I think, that the elements, the key, shows some kind of dual marker, as a dual marker. But, we can find so many exceptions, actually. For example, please see this number seven. Number seven, apparently, inside this sentence, an under and roughly. So, two persons, but without any kinds of subject. Why? And please see number eight. Two, or two, two Buddha and this Tatarada. This is the subject of this sentence. Two, but without any kinds of suffix. So, why? I think, in case such as short or simple sentences, we cannot observe such elements. Here, we return to the original text. For example, look, it's so long sentence, so long sentence. And here, this is, so, this means we, and main verb, and suffix. So, I, this is the real sentence from my previous work. So, now, I show you the first sentence. The first part means, at the time, the boy and God say to Suttana. This means boy and God, two persons. And from here, from here, to the end of these lines, actually, they are just in this conversation. So, we return to our samples from here to here. So, we can observe such sentences including suffix, quill. Insights, only composition. And so, please see, this is my sample number four. So, this, this, so, we, two persons. But who, who is two persons? Here, the boy and girls are located so far from here. This is my short conclusion. The suffix, this quill, appears in not short and simple sentence, but long and complicated sentences. In which it is not easy to know the subject. And I cannot restrict subject because in Professor Nishida's sample, so, sample D. So, I think these two, the subject and object. But in case, so, we cannot decide on the subject, because subject, two persons, D. So, I think the suffix quill is, I think, not obligated, just a reminder for the leader. And is it possible from the viewpoint of Tibetan language? Some languages in Tibetan read the special expression of this kind of dual personings. Type A is written by a verb suffix as tangu. And type B is noun suffix or special form of pronominal, so, pronominal. So, this is from Professor Nana or Yasashiko from Japan. This is Jaron language and so please see the first singular and dual and dual. So, actually Jaron language shows us some kind of feature of dual. So, this suffix and suffix, especially, please mark this qi, African qi. And so, this is the real sentence, qi gyo kama. Is it right? So, the meaning of this sentence, we, two of us, will arrive. So, I think this qi is phonetically not so far from tangu and qi, because before the e, the bira, bira, qi, qi. So, it's possible to change to the affliction qi from the in front of the central power. Next one is, I think it's not good samples, but some language has a category dual, the pronominal forms, including like qi moving. So, please see, this is the pronominal and real term, nanik, nanik, nanik. So, all the homes of dual, of pronominal, I'd say, language has this kind of dual background. This is the conclusion of number e. Actually, this qi, that's the agent. And the suffix here is not so simple, but long, like get sentences. And it functions as, I think, just a reminder. Of course, I don't know the whole language of Tibet, Burma, but actually, I think such kind of type of the affliction of dual markers. So, I think, close to jaronic languages. But actually, so, we have so more future tasks. Actually, the material mind is restricted in Buddhist texts. So, we can find the more Buddhist texts of future tasks. And of course, you know, inside the Buddhist texts, it is so hard to find the dual subject, you know, bhikni and bhikshinaka. So, but they are not so too personal and bhikni. So, including the prosperous Buddhist minds and minds, it means not dual plurals. So, anyway, from the context, we can find the subject, dual or not. And the next task is, is it possible from the view of the Tibetan Burma language? So, because I'm so poor at the modern languages, please give me some examples of the US.