 Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you, Ricky, for the introduction. There's a bit of overlapping between the Secretary for Development's presentation and mine, and I'll just try to flip through those that are overlapping with her. So, let's begin. This is the first time I participated in the Urban Age Conference. I really don't know what to expect of. So, I was given 10 minutes and 10 slides, something. I go beyond that in terms of slide, but I hope to keep to the 10 minutes. Now, I don't need to go through the basic statistics of Hong Kong because I'm sure that you've been bombarded with them over the past two days. I would like, although to point out this map below, this is a map produced by my department using remote sensing and GIS for the urban area. And I just want to highlight that all these are mountains in Hong Kong. Most of these development, urban development, are basically reclaimed land. Over the year, we have reclaimed almost 90% of Hong Kong Island and for various uses like the port in Hong Kong, the airport, and urban development and commercial development along the northern coast of Hong Kong Island. So, it is as much by design as it is by default that we have vertical development, high density and very compact urban form. I don't need to go through this. Now, we have a lot of problems and again, that's been highlighted in the morning so I don't really want to go into them, but just fit through it and we'll come back to it if you have any questions. Now, back in 2007, we have completed a strategic study for Hong Kong called the Hong Kong 2030 study. We roughly do a strategic study once every 10 years. We have adopted the so-called the integrated land use transport and environment framework to guide developments in Hong Kong. What this means is that actually back in the 80s, we use this transport model, land use and transport model as a guide for development. In the 90s, we realized that that is not enough. We have to look at environment right at the very beginning so we adopted this framework. What this means is that we conducted studies for instance for fish points. We have wetlands in Hong Kong which are frequented by migratory birds during the winter seasons. We've done study, we know the ecology of the wetland area, the fish points and then we draw up our plan to preserve the wetland and using the fish points as bubble zones and we also allow some development within the bubble zone. So these are, if you like, our ecological infrastructure of Hong Kong and we have also done landscape mapping for the whole of the territory. Just looking at the landscape value, the ecological value of the whole territory and then we draw up, in this study we draw up the so-called no-go area. These are the areas that we should not meddle with. Leave them as it is for research, for public enjoyment, for conservation to maintain biodiversity, so on and so forth and we have to focus on those developments, the land that are suitable for development. So we have a roadmap, sustainable development is our overarching goal for this strategic plan. I'll come to each of these topics later on. Right, spend a bit of time on this one, I think it's worth. This is the rail network of Hong Kong. Back in the 90s we have identified rail to make Hong Kong, to keep Hong Kong moving efficiently. We need to depend on public transport and of all public transport rail development is a backbone and we have this so-called transit oriented development on top of the rail station and this is what we have now and the green lines are in the pipeline. This will be completed, the extension will be 2014. To the south the red line here will be 2015. Also the shot into central link 2018 and 20, maybe 20, 20 across the harbor. So with all this new network I'm sure that this is what we have currently. This is what I did in the paper back in 2009 actually. The figure may have gone up a bit. Within 500 meters of our station we have 75% of our commercial and office space. Meaning jobs are concentrated there. Also if you look at other living quarters some 42% of housing units are within 500 meters of a rail station. Some of the housing development areas not really in the CBD core, the core CBD. They are on the outline area like Newtowns. But every day this will move people from going to work and back home. And I would like to point out one very important point. To make this successful you have to have very good design for the station and the connection. I'll come to that about our fridge network so that people can do multi-purpose trips. Like going to work, having the breakfast on the way, come back and do shopping before they go home. Either by on foot or by feeder surface we call them mini buses. Now with this integrated use and transport planning we have a very compact urban form. We have a high reliance on public transport and the secretary mentioned this morning about 89% of all trips, daily trips about 12 million, more than 12 million trips, 90%, 89% are using public transport. With high density and mixed use we have a very vibrant and diversified urban form. And it makes it easy for people to move around. Now this is the central map and we have a number of stations there. We have all this fridge linkage and subways and of course this mid-level escalator. For those who are familiar with Hong Kong view we realize that this now carry about more than 80,000 people a day going to work from the mid-level which is a residential area going down to central business district. In addition there are all other bridges. Some of these bridges are built by government, others are built by the private sector. We use incentive to provide them with extra plot ratio so that they can build the fridge, maintain it and operate it 24 hours a day for public use. One of our important strategy is the wise use of land resources in Hong Kong. We have very limited land resources. That's why we have to recycle the use of land like this Taikuxing residential area and also other areas. Previously shipyards or industrial areas and after the contamination of land we can use it for development. It's not avoidable to encroach on the Greenfield site sometimes but we have to be very, very prudent. So these are the new development areas in the new territories. Some of them are being used for open storage at the moment. Others are Greenfield sites but for those areas with woodland or mature trees we will preserve them as open space for the new development areas. These are not new towns. They are much smaller than sites. Our usual new town is more than well over half a million people. We are talking about 100,000 to 200,000 people for these so-called NDAs. Now I can skip through this. I mentioned earlier about the no-go areas. You'll be amazed with your in Hong Kong in the urban area. There's hustles and bustles, streets and all activities but about half an hour or 15 minutes drive you are in the country part. Beautiful landscape. And this is something the local community really treasure and we have to maintain them. So about 90% are living within three kilometers of the country part. Very quickly on the open space, we have the country part and other open spaces. And 80% of the population are living within 400 meters of the district park or open space. Actually for comprehensive residential developments they are self-contained in terms of open space and some communities facilities like primary schools and so on. It's not just the number matter, the quality of open space is important. What we're trying to do is to link up most of this open space into a network of open space. At the moment a lot of work is being done on both sides of the Victoria Harbour thanks to Christine and the others. Advocating the preserving of the harbour and now we're trying to build waterfront promenade around the harbour on both sides of the harbour. Now we can improve the built environment by doing better urban design. We have adopted air ventilation assessment at the plan making stage and for large projects we use AVA as well and I don't need to go through this. This is a summing up of what I just said, I'm running out of time but before I leave I highlight a critical issue as suggested by Ricky about a few days ago. What we are facing now, Hong Kong is a global city. We are the third largest financial centre after London and New York. Now according to the globalisation and world cities network, Hong Kong is also the third largest global city in terms of international connectivity with all these so-called advanced producer services. So we have a very strong demand for land for officers, that's why Carrie mentioned about the colonies our second CBD this morning. We have to reserve land for hospitals or data centre, they are all coming to Hong Kong. MNCs, I think according to the latest survey more than 6,000 of them in Hong Kong, either regional headquarters, regional office or local offices. So there is a huge demand for office space and other spaces but how do we create for them while maintaining or even enhancing our living quality, that is a challenge. And also very important I think is to ensure we continue to move people and goods in a very efficient manner. So this is we have to take into account. Last but not least, we have to cope with a very increasingly vocal community and diverse public views. The reason why I couldn't join the dinner last night was because we are in the hearing of a landfill site in Hong Kong and you can imagine we started meeting at 9 until 8 but there's still going to be two more meetings. So with that, these are not unique to Hong Kong but I'm sure we can pick them up in the discussion. Thank you very much. Can I just ask you two questions, thank you for that. But if you were to take Philip's presentation and obviously you haven't done the analysis, what is your sense, just sense about you have this extraordinary transport system anyway where roughly 90% use public transport. If you were to look at it in terms of education or income groups, do you think there's a considerable difference in terms of those 500 meter distances in terms of those access to public transport for different social groups? What's your sense? Well, I don't have, obviously I don't have the specific, but basically for the real station in the new territories, in the new town, they are basically public housing, so they're not well off, just ordinary people, they use public transport. But let me pick up that question raised by Professor Ho, he's left now, that Kerry is reluctant, was reluctant to answer. It's about this mobility thing, whether, you know, give them subsidies. This is exactly what the government is doing. For a very long time, all full-time students, primary and secondary students, have subsidies in public transport. And also for now we have a new scheme for people working full-time or part-time. They have 600 if they work full-time or 300 Hong Kong dollars for transport subsidies. Provided they are eligible in terms of certain income level and assets. And also for elderly people, 65 or above, and for those people with disability, they just paid two dollars, Hong Kong dollars, roughly what, 16 pens for one trip on the MTR, on the franchise buses, as well as on the ferries. So there's some subsidies to enable, if you like, from the social perspective that we have to ensure that people, less all, will still be very mobile within the system. And can I, again, follow-up question just to clarify to us. You showed the parks, and it's an extraordinary range of quality of parks, very, very close by to the dense structure of the city. And also increasingly number of, I guess, internalized public spaces in the city. Given the subject of this conference and given the notion that we're interested in health and well-being. Again, thinking of Christine's question yesterday to Dr. Chow and reversing it, given that you're in planning, I know you're not supposed to talk about other ministers or other departments' agendas, but I'm going to ask you to speculate anyway. What is the relationship in terms of people's health? Do you take that into account? Obviously it's good, but do you have any way of testing that, getting feedback in terms of that? We see it from, I think, outside as an extraordinary range of opportunities for people to just get out and let off steam effectively. But is this something which is part of your planning philosophy? This is what you said earlier on the local DNA. Hong Kong, no doubt, is a vertical development, and by the way, before I start explaining it, Hong Kong government operates as a team. I think Kerry is just joking about not meddling in other policy bureau. I, for one, have talked about these subsidies. It is not transport and housing bureau, it's the labor and welfare bureau. So we will basically government work as a team to tackle problems. But going back to your question, I think this local DNA, people no doubt the flat size of Hong Kong are pretty small by world standards. And people like to, you know, on Sundays, a lot of people do is to have tea with the extended family in a Chinese restaurant, Yamcha, and Chichat the whole morning. And also, it's very important that our country parks are so close by. Actually, a lot of people, just last Sunday, we have this charity walk in one of the country parks in Hong Kong. We have a few thousand people going there. So every year, there are more than 13 million people visiting our park. So it's as well utilized. This is a way to, if you like, compensate for the small size of the flat in Hong Kong. So, yeah. Thank you very much. I'm sure we'll come back to you. So if I could now ask Yitam Tiwari to come to the platform. Thank you.