 Jeff, what do people not understand about a parental custody of children? After a breakup in a relationship or divorce, what do they not understand? You're a smart guy, especially for Eastern Orthodox, you're doing all right. But... No shame. And, you know, we all have salt in our past, but you've done well for yourself, but you still found yourself in a situation where you don't have access to your son. How did that happen from a legal standpoint? What can people learn from about custody from your situation? Okay, so you've heard about this paternity fraud issue, and once you can accept that the courts will do this, that they will literally take 30% of a man's gross income, pre-tax income, which even millionaires and businesses can't survive, and they'll do that for 24 years for a child that's not... and the courts are willing to do that kind of thing to men. You start to think courts can do other things. So let me tell you the simplified version of how they took custody away from me. The judge issued an unconstitutional gag order, and I've repeatedly told the judge to please put me in jail for it, because I'm never following it. I have a writ of habeas corpus. I'll appear in handcuffs at the Fifth Appeals District. She'll come in her judge robes, and we'll say, who's right about this? Because I have a permanent lifetime ban from all media. Jeff, this is going online. Yeah, I know. I look in the camera and tell her all the time. So that's the first thing. They issued an unconstitutional gag order. When I didn't follow the gag order, opposing counsel got a psychologist to say that me talking about my son with other people like my church and so forth to get support from my church was harming my son. So then the judge reasoned like this. I issued the unconstitutional gag order on Mr. Younger. Mr. Younger is not following the unconstitutional gag order that was entered in the best interest of his son. Therefore, Mr. Younger is not acting in the best interest of his son. Therefore, I will give him less possession time than convicted pedophiles. That's how the judge reasoned. And what that should illustrate to you is that at law, district judges have almost unlimited discretionary power over you and family court. I'll give you some other examples that men just don't know about that affects custody. You have no financial privacy. Like every credit card transaction that I'm making here at this will be scrutinized by a judge. And that will happen until my sons are 26. You have no financial privacy. If you start a business, all of your business partners are exposed to this as well. So it circumscribes the ways that you can make money to fund a legal defense to go after custody. And that's done intentionally. So the other thing is that while they talk about custody being, in Texas there are statutes that say children have a right to an enduring consistent relationship with their parents, right? But this is really subject to the judge's determination of the best interest of the child. And let me tell you how the courts have misinterpreted that doctrine. And the lawyer here can talk about troxel later. It's a supreme court case. So certainly the statutes in all the states say that the judge should rule in the best interest of the child. What they don't say, what those statutes do not say is that the judge determines what the best interest of the child is. That is still left with a fit parent. It's called a fit parent presumption. And one of the worst abuses that even the paternity front says, all this is based on the idea that these district judges just ignore the fit parent presumption and decide how parents are going to raise their kids. And they're just going to make the parents pay for it and do all the work. And that becomes an ideological decision because there's no general agreement in this country on how we ought to raise our kids. Because of multiculturalism. That's right. A Muslim will have a very different idea than an Orthodox Christian, right? I have a very different idea obviously than my ex-wife who thinks my son should be a girl versus being a boy. Now you would think that courts would sort of pick between what the two fit parents are and choose one of those, right? But they don't. What they do is they manufacture the way they would raise the child, right? And that applies to custody. So the district judge basically does this, psychologically does this. I don't like that parent and if I were in this situation I wouldn't want that parent to have time and so I'm going to give time to the other parent. It comes down a lot to likability. And likability comes down to whether you're politically and socially congruent with the judge. So I have a far left judge, very far left judge, radical actually, far left judge. I'm clearly not congruent, socially congruent with her. And so she's determined that people like me can't raise their kids and she has the power to do it because district judges are just that powerful. The best interests of a child. Part of the problem, so I'm a pastor and I try to speak to the moral issues. I don't think there's any hope without a moral populace. But I also think when a hurricane has destroyed a town, you pick up where you can pick up. You know, we all have our different place in the rubble here in trying to rebuild something. So I've had a lot of men reach out to me. He's gone through terrible divorces, very painful custody battles. Good men, pastors who, I know one pastor who is wife. She got really in shape. He's a good dad. I'm sure he made mistakes like any dad, you know, right, worked too much for a couple months or whatever. But a good man. He got really involved in Instagram and then got into the fitness world and started hooking up with a coach. And then the pastors disciplined him for not loving his wife like Jesus would. And I'm like, Jesus says in Revelation, he'll spit you out if you don't repent. Jesus will send you straight to hell. Okay. So I don't know what you're talking about. He goes through all that. I can coach him to that. I can coach him through the church stuff. I can walk him through scripture. But then he gets into the courts and I don't know what to do. I don't know. I don't understand this world. But, you know, my position is I'm trying to get men to be fathers and get married because that's where that's what stabilizes society. But guys are saying, what, you know, what in the world? Why would I do that to myself? Like these, you know, that's what I mean with your presentations is that it's, it's truth speakers cause pain. And I'm glad you do it, you know. But so we've talked about the moral depravity. We've talked about the corruption of the court, the problems of the court. At least we started scratching at the surface here. What do we do about it? Like how did, how do guys like me and people in here, you guys are advocates. I know you guys are not making much money from this. I know that for a fact. That's not why you're here. You're here cause you're an advocate. So what do we do? How do we get involved? What are some steps? Melissa? What?