 Even before you today, in the matter of Suresh Kumar Kaushal vs. Naskam Vej, Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code is unconstitutional, that it criminalizes the intimate lives of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender individuals of the country, that it opens them up to blackmail, harassment, persecution, prosecution. This case was actually a case of the lawyers and the judges talking past each other. The judges were not entirely incorrect in asking the questions that they were asking because the law itself doesn't actually mention lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender. So it was the lawyer's job to make that connection for them. One, homosexuality could be caused by hormonal impulses. Or two, it could be because of a tumor in the brain. Or third, it could be caused by some other mental disorders. We're under no delusions. We're very aware that we're performing this piece in a very safe space. And to a certain demographic. You sort of talk about taking it to another space where you're approaching another crowd of people that don't necessarily have the sensibilities that you have. Like something I said, you do have to be careful about that because the last thing you want, a piece of art, and that's essentially what this is, is to kind of force something down your throat. On 18th June 2004, around 8pm, while I was dressed up in a female clone and waiting on the road, I was raped by 10 men. One question. How do we know all this actually happened? Why are we here? Yes, council. Yes, why? I don't think I know any more. Council, we will have to hold you in contempt. Whoever makes a statement that lowers the authority of a court will be held in contempt. You know what the definition of contempt is, council. And yet...