 Thank you very much. Thank you very much, Joy, and thank you very much for having us this morning. And thank you for calling us together with these very equal panelists. I would like to say from where I sit, we are much better than us here, and especially on several parameters. One, you could say that the path is small, but you need to see where the path is leading. A small path at least there is much worse than a bumpy one at least with a better place. So, last year it seemed like things were better, but what was insignificant are things were better. One, I want to look at the policies that were there then, and especially looking at the policies that are subsidies, for example, fuel. Yes, on one side you could argue it's better because the prices are lower, but to what extent? You cannot manage an economy official for too long, and therefore on that front I don't think we are in the right direction last year. I believe, yes, now this may be tight, and we may have to tighten our belts slightly for the time being, but the direction of the economy is what we need and we desire. Because we believe, after tightening the belts that we are doing now, the steps we are making, however small, are in the right direction. On the second front, I would say we are much better in terms of parameters, because I want to look at the economy two-sided. One in terms of economic parameters, but also in terms of GDP in the pocket. Because many times, people like us here in the panel, who are on that side of the economy in terms of profession, sometimes we talk about parameters only, and then we forget these parameters being something to people. And therefore I want to divide it in two ways. On the parameters front, because these are not figures that I make as the leader in your government. On the parameters front, I want to look at two things. Economic growth and inflation, and also debt. In regards to inflation, I think it's easier because what we have already talked about here. Last year's inflation, at a time like this, was almost a debt stricter per digit. Currently, our inflation is around 6.7%. In fact, last month it was 6.7%. The Kenyan economic benchmark that we set for ourselves, in terms of inflation, is 5% then with a burden of 2.5 in the site. And therefore it is between 2.5% to 7.5%. Currently at 6.8%, we are within our own targets, which we were not within that benchmark last year. On the side of the other parameter, which is economic growth, this room, when I look around, I have seen almost everyone here has a smartphone. And therefore it will not be very hard to get information, not Kenyan information, but also from OnePan, from IMF. We are in year 2023, and I do want to improve upon all of us to look for the data itself. That Kenya in the first quarter grew by an average of 5.3%. First quarter of 2023. In the second quarter, the data is just out. We grew by 5.4%. If you look at all the economies of the world, in those two quarters, Kenya was actually the 29th fastest growing economy in the world. Those are facts. I'm not generating them now because you can actually fight them. And the other parameter, of course, is debt. Debt, in terms of the economy, you may use to miss a debt in terms of the absolute. But it is more advisable to miss a debt subject to something. Because even as when you're going to borrow money in a bank, you don't have to go to borrow an absolute figure. You borrow money based on some parameters around yourself. And therefore in terms of debt, it is more prudent to miss a debt as a factor of GDP. If you look, for example, at the deficit side of the debt, because deficit accumulated is what then becomes perfect debt. Last year when we came in a time like this, our deficit to GDP ratio, our deficit to GDP was actually around 7.2%. When we came on board, we reduced to that in our first half of the matter. And currently as we talk, the budget that we're implementing, we are at 4.4% deficit to our GDP. So in terms of parameters, it is good. But also because I live in Kenya, I have to admit that there are many, several points of improvement that we could have. Because an economy that grows in terms of parameters must be felt in the pockets. And one of the predicaments or the hidrances of that, number one is inequality. We may have an economy growing, but growing in some certain sectors, probably not cutting so many people. And therefore in that regard, Joy, I believe we have a room to improve in terms of creating a more egalitarian society, a more equal society, and I think we are here and there. Thank you very much. All right. Thank you for trying to convince us, but I believe in the second round of questions where I have to share the audience, because also you do chair the budget and appropriation committee. Probably you can break it down for us. What do we need to do for our economy to stabilize and start to feed the people whom we are calling the hustlers with our transformation agenda? Thank you very much, Joy, again. That's a question that needs a week to answer, because basically we are talking about all the interventions that we need to do to make Kenya a better place. And most of the time when I attend such an interview, I actually don't come to the same side. I come so that we try to look for a solution, because whichever way, whichever seat you have now here, or in leadership, whether in government or otherwise, you are a Kenyan. And a much better Kenya is better for a president, a liberal opposition, and everyone else in between. And therefore, I come with my thoughts in that regard. And I want to break it down into two things, Joy, because however much we may try to run away from parameters of the economy, we go out and we get ourselves there, because there are certain ways of measuring whether an economy is doing well. And even if we say GDP is not eaten, unfortunately that is the only way that reaches the economy. And I want to look at it in both in two ways so that I give my thought on where we can improve. And I want to look first of all GDP in terms of the income side of it. And pinpoint where we could improve and what we are doing out there. And I want to look at GDP number one as a summation of our consumption as private people, and investment, and also government itself as a consumer, and also in modern exports. Mostly in class we say C plus I plus G plus X minus M. And this makes sense beyond the excess and the M's and the rest. Because for an economy to grow, you have to grow the variables. One of the variables you have to grow is private consumption. But then private consumption is an element of private income. So people have to have money for an economy to grow, and especially when you want to grow an economy through that parameter. On the other side of investment, it is also a part and also a parameter you can only do in government savings also. So to cut the long story short, I believe we have a loan in terms of a lot to do, especially to cut the last part of what I talked about. The last part of imports and exports in Kenya has been negative for almost our entire existence. We must reverse that threat of having exorbitant imports in a situation where we have very little exports. To do that, we are already doing number one is to substitute the imports that we usually have. And as I said, I am trying to break down a very huge question so that I make sense of it. So to do that you have to do import substitution, that is what we are doing in terms of work. Because however much we want to grow a very robust economy, we cannot pride ourselves in growing an economy where people are not even full secure. And therefore on that front of import substitution, we have been more into the terms of food. And currently, as you know, we are not likely to import food. For example, we are doing our best to grow all the other parameters around food. But also to cut the other side, it's a huge question also. The other side of import substitution, we are not looking to grow the economy. Kenya is stratified into three. And one of the issues that we are discussing today is part of it in terms of IT and digital economy and all that. Kenya, number one strata in the base of our economy, is what we call our Greek, agriculture or our primary production. Primary production in Kenya is agriculture, is mining, is fisheries and everything that is around primary production. What are we doing out there? You already know, I don't want to talk about what you usually talk about all the time. We all know about fertilizer subsidy and we all know that our food in terms of production has greatly improved. The other point is on industry. Because I want to stratify Kenya that is primary production and secondary production and tertiary production. In terms of industry, we are actually much behind in terms of Kenya because we need to have done much more in terms of industry because we create more quality jobs around that sector. And of course, lastly is what we must do in the service sector, which is tertiary and primary more broadcast here. Because I see we have time, our day around the digital side of the economy and around the opportunities they are in. Now, this is the paradox that we have to face as policy makers and as Kenyans. We must talk about production and productivity. Because many times, a country like Kenya focuses on labour-inducing production because we want to make every Kenyan part and parcel of the growth. But then you realise this is the paradox that most of the labour-intensive production has low productivity. If you look at Kenya as an economy, we project to have an economy of 16 trillion Kenyan citizens by June of next year. That 16 trillion, the base that is primary production, accounts for 18.2% of our GDP. I want to go sequentially so that we see this paradox. The side of industry accounts for 16.8% of our GDP. Service accounts for 65% of our GDP. Now this is the paradox. The primary production that accounts for around 18% of our GDP employs over 65% of our workforce and employs over 70% of our local Kenyan. So we must come to a point where we must distinguish the production we want to have and also the productivity. Because yet it is good to have our Kenyans working and having jobs. But at the same time, we must create an environment where we also have productivity per parcel. And I want to draw this question to you, Torin, on Nidakigari. Maybe in a household of 10, a household of 10 people, 10 people who are able to work, their father has 100,000 children, would you rather have a family of a father earning 100,000 or a household of 10 each earning 15,000? I want you to do that, Mark and all the other people here. So that we now try to unravel these paradoxes. Between having, yes, creating opportunities in labor intensive, but on the other side, these first countries that we are having and people who are very, can be very productive in an opportunity, also playing a part in this higher productivity barriers. Because across the world, the task here aside is more productive, but unfortunately, it doesn't create as many jobs. Okay, to answer your question real quick, I'll say because 15,000 is not taxed in Kenya. So I would say 10 people earning 15,000 tax free. But if it's one person and he has to be taxed any 100,000 children, then that's going to bring it down to even way less. So, but then at the end of the day, we all want or we all prefer that every Kenyan has food that they're putting on the table, no matter the kind of background they have, whether or not they're the house or the have nots.