 Welcome back everyone. Today I just wanted to show you some highlights from a debate yesterday between a guy named Destiny and a guy I know you're all familiar with Robert N'War. You definitely want to check this one out because at one point Robert actually gets Destiny to admit that these riots are really about hurting Trump. Robert definitely came out on top But like I said, this is just the highlights. If you want to see the entire two-hour debate I'll put the link to Destiny's channel in the description and in the pinned comment. Before we start though I do have to take a quick capitalism break for this channel's sponsor and a special deal for my subscribers The VPN I choose is virtual shield because it's the easiest fastest and has a plug-and-play 30-day free trial Virtual shield wants to offer a 50% off all VPN plans and all premium add-ons including protection plus residential access and VIP performance plans for as low as a cup of coffee. Sign up for a free 30-day trial of virtual shield VPN and see what all the hype's about. You have nothing to lose. Please visit www.virtualshield.com Ford slash drone tech. That's virtual shield dot com Ford slash drone tech or just click the link in the description One black person getting killed by the cops who the fuck carries It's just one black person dies of the cops shit happens like that all the time with all sorts of people The problem is one black person getting killed by the white cops becomes the icing on the cake to the all the Coronacopia of problems that black people have in the United States. So in a way The protest and the riots are about protesting against this particular black death. That's what they're about But they're not there because of just that one person getting killed Does that make sense? I understand what you're saying. I do but again, it all cruxes on the point of the oppression But we can't just look at it. I thought we were in agreement. You can't just look at the data You have to look at the underlying reasons So for example if these riots are legitimate over that what if there were and there were riots over Michael Brown That was a lie. Hands up. Don't sure there are some people that people choose that are stupid But like Trayvon Martin. I think is a better role model like how Zimmerman fucking hunted this dude down in a fucking neighborhood and shot and killed him. What the fuck that was crazy as fuck He wasn't a police officer. Who cares it was still fucked. So wait, so wait, your argument is if cross racial That that's the oppression. It's cross racial deaths. That's what we're gonna. It's not just cross racial death It's it's the like that plays into the larger narrative that like if you see a black guy wandering around a neighborhood Like maybe we should go hunt him down. What what what about the um fuck? I don't even remember the guy's name They just got driven down in a truck by the two or three white guys that shot him in the street because they thought that he was stealing Something because he walked into a house under construction and then walked away Armand people. Oh, I'm odd Arbery or whatever like Oh, yes Statistically blacks are 23 times more likely to kill whites than vice versa And even crazier than that the numbers don't even matter because then white supremacists use this argument like oh blacks are hunting down Whites, that's garbage. That's not what it is statistically You're almost 80 to 90 percent most likely be killed by someone within your own race So the idea of cross racial violence We should just dispense with it that somehow that's indicative of something anyways but if you focus on it like in the George Zimmerman case well the data clearly shows that White people are being are killed at a higher clip from black people than vice versa and by the way Zimmerman wasn't eat I believe he identified as Hispanic, but then again because the people in power want to use blacks as pawns They said oh, no, no, no, this is a narrative of a white killing a black person I don't think it was the matter of who killed the black person It was just the idea that a black kid running around through a neighborhood could be extra Judiciously hunted down and murdered by a guy felt like he was protecting his community Whether the guy was Hispanic or Asian or white or whatever So if the data is the if the data shows the opposite end Do you think white people have a legitimate grievance that they're killed more by blacks? I don't know it would depend on how those killings are part of like is this like a part of like gang violence or whatever Like I don't think anybody here is gonna defend or I mean some liberals get baited into it It's stupid gang violence is shit and it happens But I don't have as many tears for like fucking gang people shooting each other back and forth Like people say 300 mass shootings a year happen and like a hundred or 200 of those are like gang violence Whatever that's shit. It shouldn't happen. It sucks But like I don't that that's not my problem and I would feel it's probably not the problem of most African Americans That's not what destiny said you said it's right. We're agreeing. It's not about Police murdering the person because the races you said that's not the case. Okay, I guess we'll find out what like I mean I get Like I don't disagree with you that like the singular problem isn't cops killing black people It's not like this singular problem But like this is what sucks about racism and sexism today in America, right? We solved most of the easy racism sexism in America has been solved We typically don't have communities of people hanging black people off trees women are allowed to vote people don't stand outside places of Businesses saying Mexicans or Irish need not apply like most of the easy Racism and sexism stuff in the US and most of the Western world is more or less been solved now a lot of it is a lot harder to See well now I mean that's really important if stuff like this and Trump's response ends up making him less likely to get elected I assume most of the people protesting a rioting even would assume that that's like a victory on their part I mean that's outrageous though if you're riding for that kind of political reason that's even worse I mean when top-down when the only responses Trump has given is that when the looting starts the shooting starts or what like quoting? Literally that's what happens literally quoting like a racist cop from 68. I think like like that's not a good look Like that's not a good way to manage your citizens protesting like when you're literally tear-gassing people out So you can do a shitty photo op in some cemetery or church or whatever that's St. John's place Whatever like these are really bad looks for how Trump is handling things and I'm sure a lot of people be happy with literally anybody else at the helm But him I mean I think that I think that what you're saying gets to a truth of what a lot of people are thinking on the left Which they they actually like these riots and I think that this could be a reason This is the conspiratorial nature me But this could be why people like the Blasio are like yeah go ahead keep riding We're just gonna give up parts of the city and be unwilling to accept the National Guard I don't think there's conspiratorial at all. I think that effecting political change like this is fine Like that's part of the goal like like activism and riots are one side of the coin and the other side is voting like being bringing awareness to issues like this You know and an attempt to get people to vote differently as part of the goal, right? If we're looking at it in a political calculus and you're a Democrat and un-Republican, I would be happy to have that sound