 There is scientific evidence that reported due to climate change, the frequency of environmental hazards and disasters has been increased and as a result societies are transforming and peoples are facing new challenges and that is why pattern numbers and dynamics of human mobility are sensed that results in migration. So, migration is classified into different types and forms. They can be temporary or permanent, forced or voluntary, regional or international, but necessary induced human migration in a specific community is very different. Those people who are stationary and to the people those are moving from one place to another. So, phasers who are almost stationary and fishing in the nearby rivers or channels they are called non-migratory phasers. They are well informed about the environmental challenges of their livings and they can accomplish the changes by the local knowledge of the environmental changes, but phasers who are moving from one place to another they are considered as migratory phasers, but they are not well opportunistic as the non-migratory phasers to the changes of climate change, but they have different perceptions on it. So, for this study we selected the fisheries sector of Bangladesh. As Bangladesh is the fourth world's biggest inland capture fisheries that significantly contributes in economic development, food security and overall livelihoods, but there are some literatures that reported due to climate sense this country is one of the most vulnerable around the world. As stated earlier this country has high dependency on the fisheries sector, but this figure shows due to the climate sense the fisheries sector is one of the most vulnerable sector in Bangladesh and around the world. So, to reduce these climatic impacts and to reduce the changes to making substantial benefits of this sector, fisheries need some response strategies for minimizing the climatic impacts, but most of the studies on climate sense and disasters fisheries are focused on documenting trends and fluctuations in fish abundance impacts of the marine ecosystems and macro level influences on the vulnerability and adaptive capacity, but macro level studies cannot provide a specific findings that are applicable for the local or community level, but in Bangladesh due to climate sense strategies they are mainly focused on agriculture sector and the coastal regions, but there is no study on the impacts of climate sense or disasters on the inland migratory and non-migratory fishers and their response strategies to minimize the impacts. So, for this region we aim to study to assess the climatic impacts on the migratory and non-migratory fishers and find out their response strategies to overcome the impacts. First of all we selected for the river for this study as it is significantly contributes in the economy of Bangladesh and the river is considered as one of the most beating ground for fin fishers and there are both types of fishers are present. So among numerous for the river fisheries dependent communities for this study we choose only two fishing villages is Andharmonic and Dhulshara. As the fisheries dependency of the for the river and there are some literatures that reported these two villages are highly affected by the changes of climatic hazards and both types of fishers are present. For this at first we conducted reconnaissance study to gain preliminary information about the two fishing villages and then we target our respondent groups and then we proceed for the data collection. We used three different methods for the data collection, household interviews, focus group discussions and informant interviews. For household interviews actually we collected the fishers list from the Upozala fisheries office that is the sub district level of the divisions and that works as a sampling frame. From the sampling frame we selected the respondents. We designed a questionnaire for the household interviews and we also designed a checklist for focus group discussions and informant interviews. These three methods mainly used for data triangulation and validation. If one methods we get one result and another method in different results then we can triangulate the results which one is best, which one is true. So that is why we use these three methods and after data collection, data analysis by descriptive statistics and content analysis and after data analysis we verified our results through focus group discussions and key informant interviews again. So this figure shows the data collection process in the field. This the figure A and figure B showed data collection through household interviews, figure C and D shows data collection through focus group discussions and E and F shows data collection from key informant interviews. So based on this data collection data analysis we found the climate sense are affecting to the both type of fishers. But this figure shows mainly is from the most dominated climatic hazards that affected both type of fishers followed by low rainfall high temperature or low temperature and river bank erosion. These climatic impacts together really affected fishers livelihood. So we as they are affected to the fishers livelihood we classified the impacts of which climatic hazards how much affected the fishers livelihoods. So as is term was the main climatic hazards that affected fishers physical capital, human capital, social and financial capital. Such as example is term fishers lost their fishing equipment that traps their nets sometimes they are injured by the is terms when extreme case happened then some fishers are died. So after the is term lower rainfall also affected fishers human, natural and financial capital when rainfall reduced the water body become reduced. So that is why they did not get enough water resources to fish. So that is why that is affected their natural capital and also temperature senses affected fishers human, natural and financial capital. But river bank erosion affected fishers physical social and financial capital. We mentioned here river bank erosion for affecting fishers social capital as some people migrated from their origin to different area as they lost their houses due to the river bank erosion. So all of these climatic hazards and their effects completely affected fishers financial conditions. So fishers took some short term and some long term strategies to minimize the climatic hazards the short term strategies are classified here as coping strategies like selling physical assets reduction of household food consumptions taking informal sources of credit, implement their children's in fishery related activities rather sending them to school. So the fishers compliantly used only that they did not put active households assets for the minimization of reducing fish gas, loss of land property and reduction of the destruction of the infrastructure and temporary unemployment. Like this fishers reduced their household food consumptions for reduced fish gas and loss of income from fishing and these are the similar type of coping strategies for the minimizing fishers climatic impacts. So the cross relationship between the coping strategies and the climatic impacts are like this. So as I told earlier fisher system some long term strategies to minimize the impacts and these are known as adaptation strategies and they are changed in fishing gear. So in previous time they used caskinate leaf net but at present time they used sea net and gill net. Fishers changed their fishing sorry changed their fishing duration cause in previous time they usually fished seven or eight hours but at this moment they used to fish 12 hours 14 hours. So they changed their fishing duration and also they diversified their livelihoods through different non fishery related activities like working in another field, selling some goods, driving vehicles, something and to minimize the mainly the river bank erosion they constructed embankment to reduce the climatic impacts. So fishers takes some adaptation strategies for one climatic impacts like reduced fishing and fish gas. Fisher's adaptation strategies are four, sensitive fishing gear, sensitive fishing duration, sensitive fishing ground and livelihood diversification and other adaptation strategies for large of land property are embankment constructions and tree plantations and some other climatic adaptation strategies for the impacts are like this. So finally the close relationship between climatic impacts and adaptation strategies are like this. So as I told fishers take some short term and long term response strategies to minimize the climatic impacts but when we compared these two groups of fishers we found lesser number of migratory fishers. Here we can see the migratory fishers is 63 percent, so it is their productive household assets then the non migratory fishers and taking informal cadets 68 percent then non migratory fishers and sensitive fishing duration 47 percent then the non migratory counterparts but they increased or they used more fishing gears mechanized fishing gears then the non migratory fishers and they diversified the livelihoods then the non migratory fishers. But when their adaptation strategies are taken in a unplanned way that adaptation strategies are considered as male adaptation strategies mainly they are result from lack of intersectoral coordination from this study we found around 61 percent as non fishery reported embankment construction that was taken to minimize the river bank erosion. But they considered that embankment construction as a male adaptive strategy as it is disconnect the Oatman river to the nearby bills and associated flood plains that is why they reduce or they lost their water resources to fish and from focus group discussions we calculated 20 percent fish production reduced due to these embankment constructions. There is another study while at all he reported due to the flood dam constructions around 50 percent fish production can be reduced and as I told earlier the fishers involved their children in fishing fishery related activities rather sending them to the school 50 percent is both type of fishers are doing this type activities they ingest their children in fishery related activities. So based on these results we concluded climatic hazards and disasters has impacts on the livelihood activities strategies and outcomes of both migratory and non-migratory fishers. They are quite similarly affected by the strong changes of rainfall and temperature but river bank erosion only affected non-migratory fishers as the migratory fishers are opportunistic they move from one place to another that is why they are not affected by the river bank erosion. But unlike these climatic impacts a lesser number of migratory fishers I already told sold their physical assets to informal sources of caddy and intensified fishing whereas more of them used sorry modernized fishing boats and diversified their livelihoods that said they are less affected by the changes of climate. So both type of fishers are responding to these climate sense impacts but these are not sufficient enough to fully address their impacts. So our limitation is there are numerous for the river fishery dependent communities but we only focus to fishing villages. So if we conduct more studies more fishing communities then this result can be defined from those and there may be something new findings we can get from this study. So that is all of my presentation. Thank you everyone.