 Good day everybody. Thank you very much for having me here today. It's a pleasure. Indeed I will be showing exactly those numbers in my presentation about the work that we've actually done here in Dublin about the potential of shared mobility for the city. I will focus however first on the disruptions we see in our cities today. There are several. Philip already mentioned several of them and I apologize for repeating them but as we are between you and lunch I can speed up a little bit and go above those points where we have the same points. So the first disruption is data what we see in cities. Some have called data the oil of the 21st century economy. I would say location data is the gold. That has enabled new business models but it has also created and changed the way people move today in our cities. We see a huge increase of new mobility services that have emerged and allow for seamless car based transport based on sharing. Not only any more car based the slide when I did this was year and a half ago the first time I used this slide. Now as Philip mentioned we have shared bikes, shared scooters, certain motorcycles etc etc. We don't know yet where this will take us. Looking at the average life cycle of a e-scooter in some of the cities is less than 10 days. So there's still things to be done but it doesn't mean this is not a solution. These are still part of the ecosystem of mobility in our cities. However car and ride sharing all the sharing ride sharing systems are at the heart of the sharing economy that is taking place today. This disruption is reinforced by our personal preferences and values. In the city of Stockholm only 10% of people of 18 years old have a driver's license. When I was 17 the first thing I wanted to have was a driver's license. I come from Finland with long distances that would explain part of it. So is Sweden. Today maybe the values have changed and actually when we look at the data for OECD countries we see a same trend across the countries including United States of the declining number of driver's license. Values are changing. Automation also mentioned by Philip. Another disruption. Several companies have announced high autonomy cars coming onto markets in the years to come. Maybe around 2030. Self-driving cars may be still far away given some of the challenges but if these companies do hit their target if we go for self-driving cars that means that the children who were born today will not need a driver's license ever and their children don't even know how to drive a car. So there's this huge disruption or change in the way we see mobility that is coming up in our societies. Now these disruptions are reinforced obviously by some of the great challenges we've been talking today. Climate change. Transport 23 percent of the CO2 emissions we don't see anything happening on that. By 2050 we project CO2 emissions from transport will be 60 percent higher than today. Even putting in place every single transport policy we have today we would get the reduction of 30 percent of those CO2 emissions that is far far beyond behind the 1.5 agreement or ambition that we have. Congestion is another problem in our cities. Reinforcing every day a new car is coming into the street and if I look at the cars by the way also here in Dublin a lot of them are single occupancy cars. People are driving by themselves. So public transport is an option. It's not however available everywhere. It is often crowded infrequent and people might need to transfer and we know that the more transfers people need to take actually more likely they're taking a car to their trip to work or their leisure purposes. So the starting point of our work was the slide that Philip showed as well is the fact that a car on average is only used about 50 minutes a day. The rest of the time it's standing somewhere parked. The fact that we actually accept such an inefficiency does reveal how much we value the convenience we get from the car when we're using it at the moment. But we looked at what might happen if you replaced all the cars in the city and even the buses with optimally dispatch shared vehicles. And I have to stress this is not a transition scenario. We're not saying how you get there. It is the mind thinking game where you think what could be the range and scale of an impact if you had that kind of system in place. So we simulate in our model shared taxis type of an uber pool where you have three four people sharing a car sharing a taxi door to their service optimized routes real time a shared taxi bus optimized on-demand bus booking 30 minute in advance drops you off 400 meters from your destination picks you up 400 meters from your original something actually does exist around the world in few cases already. We have done this work I mentioned before we've done this work for several cities around the world Dublin was one of them and we're very excited to work here because this is slightly different city from some of the others we looked at. It's sprawl large area with low density population. Would our results be as interesting as they were some of those more densities like Lisbon or Helsinki although we did also model Auckland New Zealand which is hugely sprawl city as well. This work was done in close collaboration with the Department for Transport and the National Transport Authority actually here in Dublin. So what we did we simulated every single trip over a day that takes place in the city and using the real routes that are available and all the real origin destinations. In the greater Dublin area that's the study area and I apologize if I miss Bell it's Dublin, Meath, Kildrade and Wicklow and I apologize if didn't go perfectly fine. This is an area of nearly 7,000 square kilometers but only 1,000 square kilometer of it has someone living in it or an employment place in it. The rest is empty. There are 1.8 million inhabitants in the region who make 4.6 million trips a day so we simulated every single one of those trips in our model. 64% of these trips are made by car mostly single occupancy accounting for around 77 percent of all the passenger kilometers taking place in the city. The population is dense obviously as you know in Dublin while the rest of the greater area has towns with relatively small concentrations. So we looked at what would happen if all car and bus trips in the greater Dublin area would be replaced by shared mobility services and this is what we found. With this kind of system you could actually deliver the same mobility as before with only 2% of vehicles needed for the city. That shows how much underusing our cars. 2%, that means more than 9 out of 10 of vehicles can be removed from our streets. This was very consistent to our other results from Helsinki, Auckland, New Zealand and other cities we're working with. The differences are due to changes or differences in the starting levels, the congestion, the availability of public transport etc etc. What would be the impact on CO2 emissions for full replacement? One third of the CO2 emissions could be removed from from our transport system by replacing the car driving. A bit less than in the case of Lisbon, Auckland, Helsinki but still very much aligned to our findings that sharing, increasing the average occupancy of our vehicles is really one of the solutions we need to look for. This would also mean that if you only need 2% of the vehicles you don't need parking space in the cities. You can transform that parking space to something more livable in our cities, to parks, to parklets, the beautiful picture that Philip showed in his last slide to make our cities really more livable. Another benefit if you wish of shared mobility is that it actually accelerates clean tech penetration. The vehicles that you have in place still are much more intense use, they used all the time. They have a much shorter life cycle and this causes a rapid fleet renewal and emergence and renewal of new technologies such as electrification to the fleet. Today average cars are in many countries more than 10 years old so this cycle is really really slow for new new technologies. And another very important point and I can't stress more about that. Philip also talked about that. I'm very glad I think our messages are very much aligned which would be also nice to fight a little bit but I think the the most important thing why we use car, why we use transport is for access to our opportunities. That's what we need it for. We need to access our opportunities. In this type of a shared mobility system the number of people who would have good access to opportunities whether it's jobs, healthcare, education would double in the greater doubling area. Pretty much everyone would have a good access in their in their lives. But okay 100 replacement of all cars, buses that's not a realistic scenario. That's sort of a mind thinking that what could be the potential but what would be a more realistic scenario. We've done the same exercise I mentioned in several cities around the world. We have had several interviews with focus groups, understanding people's preference, understanding what what makes them share car, why they use private car. We've done say the preference surveys to a huge group of people in five cities and this is what we found for for greater doubling area. 23 percent of of Dubliners would actually be willing and used or interested in using this type of shared modes. Interesting in this one is that the car trips are only 28 percent and if you remember the first slide people using today car is 64 percent. So you would significantly reduce trips made by car and also move it to the public transport. One of the differences between the cities that I'm showing here is that in Dublin people would move from using car to both shared mobility and public transport because for the first leg you don't need that own car anymore. If you can get shared mobility as a feeder service to your mass transit you actually have a have a very smooth travel to your destination. In New Zealand Auckland not surprisingly car is still the main dominant mode it's a very sprawl city but in Helsinki on the other hand 63 percent of people would be willing to use shared mobility services. The Helsinki is an interesting case not only because I come originally from Finland but because in Helsinki there has been already a system similar to what we simulated it's an on-demand shared taxi bus that is called Kutsu Plus and it was hugely popular and people have already an experience on what would it mean to have a door-to-door type of public transport service and that is really shown in the figures that they really found it valuable and would like to have it keep it going. A couple of more insights about the work we've done on shared mobility on these interviews with people. One of the interesting thing on every single city was that people prefer to share vehicles with more people than with few. This was counter-intuitive to us I thought people say I'd like to be there by myself. The reason for when we asked him what why was that well if there's a one person in an issue to me I might need to have have to strike a conversation with that person but if there are three four people I can mind my own business continue my travel as if it was a public transport and I don't have to worry about that discussion. Early adapters in most of the cities are people who are living far away from the city center from the jobs job locations who are forced to use the car because there's no other alternative they would love to use other alternative if it was available. Today many of them use public transport and with several free changes it becomes complicated to get to your jobs or hobbies. Also younger people we've seen that trends that I mentioned in the beginning and women are also far more willing to use this type of services as men. The interesting thing that came also from many of these studies and this is in case of in Dublin over 24 percent of the respondents who have a car today would be willing to sell one or more of their cars if the shared mobility service was available. So let's take that 20 percent as a some kind of a realistic mark of replacing 20 percent of car trips in in the greater Dublin region and keeping the core bus network so only replacing the low demand low frequency bus lanes which are highly expensive to maintain for public transport authorities as well and huge results. Just with replacing 20 percent you can cut the CO2 by 23 percent. Why the difference? Because these are the trips that are the longest trips. We're only replacing 20 percent but these are actually the trips that come from the region to the city center with long distances with a lot of passenger kilometers. You can also reduce congestion by 10 percent and the fleet by 20 percent I said. And this is just a reminder what we modeled here was using current vehicle technologies a combustion engine of a car. If this was electrified this obviously would bring emissions to close to zero. But the downside of electrification in the size of a region like Dublin is that it is big so you would need additional fleet quite a large additional fleet at least with the current technologies that we have to charge the batteries. Another thing and I like exactly the Lego picture here is that we can only look at electrification alone it's part of the solution yes we need to electrify but as you also said electric congestion is still a congestion so we need to focus on sustainable mobility providing people an opportunity to access their opportunities with low cost with low time and a clean environment so it is a combination of of the measures. So for my final slide what are the key takeaways from our work on shared mobility more generally and I have to remind this is just a one part of a package I'm focusing deliberately on shared mobility there are many others that are there that need to be considered. Shared mobility is already becoming a new public transport mode when people talk about public transport we typically think of bus or rail but all the shared systems shared car shared vehicle shared scooters they are a part of that public transport offer that we have in our cities and we recommend the cities and governments to integrate that into your transport offer especially use them as a feeder service to increase use of public transport target those people who don't have an opportunity those have living farther away from the city center and target them to feed into the core bus network and rail and really moving away from car users. At the end of the day I always get a question in many of the presentation what would be the solution the first solution for you to solve the problem of congestion solve the problem of climate change and I always say if I knew I wouldn't be probably here I'd be talking in somewhere else today but it is quite simple increase the average load of every single transport mode cars for passengers for freight it's always about the utilization rate of the vehicles we have on our space so thank you very much and I'll stop here