 I had some indication that one of them might ask, one operative Johnson is for the touch cut, but is that just because he thinks it's, you know, how nasty they can be? Just because he thinks it's a good thing to prevent a recession between now and the election, or is that part of a fiscal policy designed to, in an active way, to make full use of the economy's potential and to compensate for gaps in the private economy. Okay. Fine. Those are the three things that I... I'm saying he's been from since the day of his first announcement. He participated in the formulation of the bill and he sat in on all the meetings and he's made speeches all over the country about it. Perhaps more than anybody in the administration, he's known Johnny come lately to it. Now, why is he cutting these expenses? He's cutting the waste and maybe the things that he needs not to. In order he has some money to do the things that he does need to do. Right. And he may take out an antiquated installation where they're teaching somebody to plant a plane that'll never be flown and will need a missile instead in order to have grandma or somebody in West Virginia, Tennessee, that's not eaten now. Right. So he's going to plant an installation and that's gonna be for grandma. Yeah, that's very good. And of course, that follows the theme on that today's show also which used that kind of an illustration. And I would agree that you had to prove your grip, bro, by showing how much money you could throw away. I have always supported WPA and PWA and river development, and oil utilization and public housing and everything else. Right. I remember I never supported corruption in any of those things. I never supported waste in any of them. And I never supported just throwing away common sense and I believe I'm kind of angry at his level. Well, and of course, you know, Paul Douglas has done a lot of work to make economy and government respectable. Yes. I just point out that Keith's and Paul Douglas, this is some of the greatest laborers we've got. They don't believe throwing money away. Yeah. Right. You don't know whether either one would like to be compared to the other or not, but the greatest matter in that is, of course, you're concerned. I've been, this is no Johnny come lately. I, on the Naval Affairs Committee in 1938, I was running an investigation pointing up wasting the Navy. In 1948, I was pointed up in the Senate as head of the Preparance Committee. I've done this stuff for 12 or 15 years in the Senate. Right. I've had 25 years pointing up waste. And that's all I'm doing in the federal government. But that doesn't mean that we're not going to have a National Sundance Foundation. That doesn't mean that we're not going to have an Appalachian program. And that doesn't mean that we're not going to have a better program for the Peace Corps. What it doesn't mean is we're going to have less money wasted and more money available for those things because of the stocking of waste. Right. Well, that's exactly something I want to stress. Maybe it's thirsty people on the water. But that doesn't mean that you ought to turn on the hot drink and let the tank all run drunk before you put a bucket out. What we're doing is we're going to put a bucket out here to save all we can.