 Hello, I'm Kevin Stewart. I'm the convener of the Scottish Parliament's Local Government and Regeneration Committee. Over the past five years, we've played a major part in shaping legislation. In particular, we looked at the Community Empowerment Bill, where we made major changes to benefit the people of Scotland. In all of our work, we've been guided by particular principles. Engagement was critically important to us right from the start of the session, and we have reaped the rewards. We travelled thousands of miles all over Scotland, meeting people in 19 locations, to hear directly from them about their experiences on a huge range of subjects. We found it enormously beneficial, and all those we encountered genuinely influenced our input into either our legislative scrutiny or our enquiries. Challenging people in public bodies is of course a fundamental function of the Scottish Parliament, but given our remit of scrutinising local organisations, we have also been alert to the needs to keep complacency at bay. They're a popular product. They're a digital product. Just because they're popular doesn't mean to say they're right. You know, that wasn't the initial thrust of my question. Where are you at now? In terms of private sector leverage. Private sector leverage at the moment is sitting with around about £3 million, £3.5 million. Out of an investment from the public purse thus far of... Out of a second? Investment from the public purse thus far. I think it's in order for about £61 million, £61 million. Our relationships with communities of people, and by communities we mean both geographic areas and fields of interest, require time, work and trust building over the years this committee sat. What would you either add to the bill or what would you like to see strengthened within the proposed bill? Community is having a stronger voice. Community is being included in other committees. I think everyone agrees that it was an invaluable investment that provided us with levels of insight, which otherwise just wouldn't have been possible. We quickly became aware of how frequently process or being bind to rigid ways of doing things could get in the way of good public services. I was kind of expect that kind of information to be uppermost in a report like this. You're saying that it's not your role to gather that performance and public satisfaction and information because others are doing it. Well, I think our role is to make sure that an agreed set of data is collected, analysed and charted annually. We have carried out a huge amount of work during the course of this term, and we believe that our successor committee should look at the impact of some of the legislation that has been passed during this parliamentary session. We also believe that our successor committee should look at the governance and procedures of certain organisations. They make a real impact to the people of Scotland and we believe that some of that requires further scrutiny in the future. We'd like to thank everyone who has helped us in our work.