 Alright, let me just map this out a little bit here. Okay, close job right okay. So first totalitarianism. The way that a government implements totalitarianism is, is they identify something that is so overridingly important that everything else must be sacrificed to that one thing. So, usually it's a war, or in this case a pandemic that gives the pretext for suspending civil liberties and exercising total control surveillance and censorship over the population. Because everything is cast in the light of one thing, keeping everybody safe. For example, usually it's some form of safety or security. Well, on a personal level then we can also engage in totalitarian behavior and enhance, strengthen the field of totalitarianism. When we cast the world into the black and white tones of the one important thing. Basically religious fundamentalism is a form of totalitarianism on on a smaller scale, where this is the one important thing and no matter if you're talking to a fundamentalist about anything. They will very quickly bring it back to whatever their fundamental beliefs are could be, you know, religious fundamentalism it could be climate fundamentalism could be seeing everything in terms of patriarchy or white supremacy, or, I mean even the enneagram I mean, there are these ways to these rubrics of understanding that can that can be as like I was describing before become glued to your eyeballs. We might also call those things a totalizing discourse that colonize all of reality in its wildness and tame it into a finite set of categories and a certain logical structure. When it comes to say cloud Schwab or Bill Gates, we can ask what aspects of their humanity are invisible through whatever totalizing lens we are applying to them. And in fact, you know I've actually thought quite a lot about both of those two men to try to understand them. One thing that makes it hard to understand them is if I simply write them off as inexplicably irreducibly evil. But what happens if I ask in earnest, the question that interbeing invites, what is it like to be you. How could it be that that cloud Schwab believes that what he's doing is good, and he is the hero of his own story. It's not actually that hard. I, you know, even that infamous phrase, you will own nothing and be happy. Do you know where that came from. Have you thought about where that came from. And actually, it originates I believe in this concept of a leasing economy, where instead of owning automobiles and washing machines, and, and computers, because really what you want isn't a washing machine what you want is to be able to wash your clothes. If you're owning them you least them, and you, and, and you simply pay, you know, a rental fee for your washing machine. Why is that good, because then the manufacturer has an incentive to create durable repairable products, rather than the throw away and sold to you, you know, I'm done. So what if, what if it remains the property of the manufacturer, and they are responsible for its maintenance and disposal. That would be a good thing right. So this is like one little piece if you if you take apart the great reset. And really, with a generous mind, look at where it's coming from. It's not so obvious that it's a bad thing. The reason why it is dangerous in my mind comes from some of the unexamined assumptions that it draws from. So don't examine those assumptions and address the great reset from that place. And instead you address it from this ignorant misunderstanding of its motivation. You can seem like a shrill hysterical idiot to the elites that are promoting it, and you will be ineffective in, in even like an illogical way of refuting it or questioning it because you won't understand it. So this is, even if, if we are going to fight certain powers in the world, we will be more effective if we don't simply write them off as evil. You have to understand your enemy. If you're going to have, if it's going to be an enemy, you have to understand your enemy. And when you do, you may not have to fight at all.