 Interestinen ja huomioida ovat yksi karakteristikkia, jonka sillä on tietysti hieman kautta researcha tai hieman kautta. Mutta hieman huomioida ja huomioida ei ole sama, ja hieman huomioida ei ole hieman huomioida ja huomioida ei ole hieman huomioida. Joten, mitä nämä konseptit ovat ja miten valitaan, johon esityksessä on hieman huomioida tai huomioida. Interestinen on konseptit, jossa on tietysti hieman huomioida. Ja hieman huomioida on tietysti tietysti tietysti kotilta 1971. En tiedä, että on hieman huomioida, mutta hieman huomioida on, että on hieman huomioida, jos hieman huomioidaan. Joten, jos en hieman huomioida, että on hieman huomioida, ja sitten joku menee, että UFO just lenni infronta universitylle, haluan löydä, että on hieman huomioida, koska on hieman huomioida, että on hieman huomioida, ei hieman huomioida. Joten tämä on hieman huomioida. Ja hieman huomioida on tietysti hieman huomioida, joka on hieman huomioida. Se on hieman huomioida, huomioida, jotka on hieman huomioida, each of these themes, that are indifferent to our prior beliefs, are not interesting. So this is one way to define interestingness, how much these challenges are current thinking. Interestinglyness and importance are two different things. And there is some debate on whether interestingness is actually something that we should try for in research, or whether we should strive for importance. Quite often, when you see articles, Their findings as interesting, because if you present interesting findings, then that is more likely to get attention and more likely to get others to read your study or read your theory. Important things are sometimes boring, we don't want to do important things all the time and for that reason importance has been less of a concern for some researchers. So what is importance then if importance is not the same as interestingness? This article from Agenda Management Journal or editorial states that importance relates to consequences. So things finding theories that have big consequences for society or for individuals are important. For example if we think about the COVID-19 pandemic, there are the claim or recommendation that we should socially distance it is important because not doing so has big consequences for society. But it is not interesting because it does not challenge our prior beliefs and we've heard the recommendation of social distance in quite many times. So importance can mean two different things. On the level of a theory or level of a claim, interestingness can mean relevance and consequences. So if something has consequences and those consequences are relevant for me then that claim or theory is important. Otherwise it is not important. Another thing that is important is evidence. So if we do a trial of a new medication, we find that that medication works, that could be an interesting finding and an important finding. If we replicate the same study again, we find evidence that the medication works. Well, that is not interesting because we had that evidence already but it is important because we want to know that the first study that studied the effectiveness of the medication was not just an analysis error. And we also want to know that it was just not that specific population in which the medication was useful but it applies more broadly. So quite often we have an initial idea, initial piece of evidence which is interesting and then we have still lots of uninteresting but important things to do to know that the claim that was initially made is actually valid, not the result of analysis error or research design error and not a result of simple idiosyncrasies of one particular population or sample.