 This study examined how people reacted to a public health-focused essay on climate change. The results suggest that two out of five audience segments responded positively to the essay, while two others had mixed responses. The fifth group did not respond positively. Additionally, post hoc analysis revealed that the groups who responded positively were more likely to respond favorably to information about the health benefits of mitigation-related policies compared to those who responded negatively. This suggests that presenting climate change from a public health perspective can be effective in engaging audiences and making the topic more personal and understandable. This article was authored by Baldwin-Pawler, Nisbet Matthew, MyParkEdwardW, and others.