 Good evening everyone. I hope you're all doing well. Thank you everyone for your lovely comments. I see some conversations going on about the massive storm we were supposed to have over the weekend. I don't get it wrong, I'm glad we didn't. But I was just thinking about Stan, I thought press hyping things up. How unusual. I hope you're all doing well. Thank you for joining us. A couple of things I want to remind you of before we get on to this evening's topic. One of them is Telford this weekend. So Saturday the 26th we're back in Telford. A month on from the events we had there that we will be following up with some distribution of party literature in some carefully selected parts of Telford. I'll show you there. We will be handing out, let me see where do I, there we are. And going through some policy proposals which I'll take you through now actually very briefly. Deport foreign national suspected of involvement with grooming gangs. And they do mean suspected of, reasonably suspected of. We don't, we know how difficult it is to get convictions on this. But if a person in this country is not a citizen, then they are here until the British people decide to remove them. And reasonable suspicion of involvement with grooming gangs. It's not, being removed from the country is not a conviction. It's being removed from the country. Sac and prosecute corrupt police. And you'll remember that from Tommy Robinson's video. The allegations of corrupt police. And you know it doesn't stop with this guy. You know this is something that is without doubt happening across the country. And one of the reasons this thing keeps going on by this thing I mean, this evil, this rotten cover up of rape of young girls. Deport and or sentence rapists and child abusers to at least 20 years of prison. You know the wonder why these crimes are so widespread. Well one of the reasons why they're so widespread is because the ridiculous punishments, pittance, they need real punishment. Prosecute corrupt council officials and sack incompetent social workers. You'd think it would go without saying, but it doesn't. Provide funds for cancelling for rape, sexual abuse, survivors 100% and not taxpayers money. I think the majority of taxpayers would prefer that their money was spent helping the victims of these things and not legal aid for convicted grooming gang. And finally, and very importantly, and mass immigration. The lunacy will tell you this has nothing to do with mass immigration, even though that's who's doing it and all over Europe. It's a bit like when they said Cologne had nothing to do with the fact that Germany had opened its borders when they had all just come into the madness, absolute madness. 26, we're working on exactly where that's Saturday coming. We're working on exactly where we're going. I will let you know exactly where we're going, but sign up to it. Give, if you haven't already, give Sharon a shout at inquiriesadforbritain.uk. Tell her you want to come along to Telford on Saturday and we'll make sure that you get the information and meeting place and all the rest of it. Thank you, by the way, to everyone who has signed up already. I shall see you on Saturday in Telford. Candidates, we need candidates to stand in the May elections. We really do. This is our, the standing for election is so, so, so important. It's our platform. It's our way of getting out there and it's what we're here to do. It's what this all comes down to is standing for election. We have to. So please have a think about standing. If you have concerns and I understand why you would have concerns, get in touch. And as we get, you know what, I'll do it next week. Next week, I'm going to address concerns that people will have. So we'll dedicate the livestream next week to standing for election and I will address concerns. I've just seen a comment to come in. SMP proposing to reduce the age of sexual consent to 13. I think you can, it's, it's, barely, I was going to say it's barely fathomable, but it isn't fathomable at all. I, you know, this is why I think someone in politics has to be pushing in the other direction, including with voting. Now, I know how difficult all these things are, but the left wants to lower the age for just about everything because they know perfectly well that young people are idealistic. Idealistic, you remain, you know, for a lot of young people remain idealistic until the realities of life, paying your own bills, standing on your own feet, become part of your day, part of your daily life. Idealism is a good thing and principles are a great thing, but they know that young people are idealistic generally, but also that they are in today's environment so brainwashed by left-wing thinking as the left wing is thinking is the default thinking. And they know that the younger they get people, the more on their side they're going to be. So I think someone in politics has to be pushing in the other direction. The age of consent to 13 is a, it's a charter. And, you know, regardless of what people, people will often make the argument or they'll do it anyway, but that's not any reason to, they're doing it anyway because we've culturally sexualized children and have been doing so for a long time. But that's no reason for us to say, okay then, fine. We need to be teaching something other than it's okay for children to be having sex. We should, we need to be someone. And there are people, I think the majority of us believe it's not okay for children to be having sex, but their voices are silenced. And this is just this more, this thing, this is the first time hearing of it, to be honest, that the SNP is proposing that. It's just more of the same. I find it actually quite disturbing and disgusting. Okay, main topic for tonight, it is all falling apart for Black Lives Matter. And this is relevant to the campaign that we spoke about, that I spoke about a couple of weeks back on Edward Coulson and the statue in Bristol. And if you mark the 9th of April in your diary, mark it as something very important. 9th of April, we've got a bit of work to do and I'll keep you updated over the next few weeks. And Richard, I know that you're watching. I've seen that I have an email from you today. I will get back to you tomorrow at the latest on that one. So mark the 9th of April as a significant day. Briefly, briefly explain again why I think this is so important and why Bristol is so important. This is, Bristol is almost ground zero for this stuff, this in Britain. It is, I think it was Frankie that said the other day when we had a meeting about this. Bristol is our Portland. And Portland is a city in Oregon which is America's ground zero on the whole Black Lives Matter movement. And Bristol is essentially ours, our equivalent. And it's going to be risk filled for us to campaign in Bristol. We'll deal with the police and I will keep you up to date on what dealings we have with the police in trying to organize a protest, some sort of event in Bristol. And we will be able to see the difference, I predict at least, we will be able to see a huge distinction between how the police deal with Black Lives Matter and how the police deal with a protest against Black Lives Matter. But all of that said, it is starting to crumble a little bit for them. Let's start at the beginning with Black Lives Matter. Now, we know that the violent, Marxist movement that is so dominant in the Western world today is friendly, both with the mainstream media and with mainstream social media, very friendly. In fact, it is the mainstream media that does their censoring for them. It's the mainstream media that does their propagandizing for them without the mainstream media and online and offline. They wouldn't have anything resembling the power that they have. And what power do they have? They've got the power to get police, footballers. Every part of our culture, our popular culture is saturated in it. It's so disappointing. It really is to find that not a part of our culture is untouched by this. It is in everything, everything. You know, sometimes you'd see, I don't watch a great deal of television, but it is a nice way at the end of a night sometimes to relax. And you'll sometimes see that there might be a few-part drama on that looks really good. And you think, right, I'll invest in a little bit of a crime drama or something, for example. And you watch it and it's saturated, saturated in Black Lives Matter and other political posturing. If nothing is untouched by films, television dramas, music, everything, everything saturated in it. Because it gets much more serious than that. When you have police and politicians and we had the theater of the Labour Party, let's not forget, and the deputy leader of the Labour Party getting on their knees, football, sport, supposed to be neutral, but no longer neutral because the extreme left has injected itself into it, even into football. So they're incredibly, incredibly powerful. And they've been given nothing but positive coverage until now. If you look at their Wikipedia page, and I mentioned that they are on good terms with mainstream media online as well as off, and it's very important their relationship, whether it be an actual relationship, which is an ideological relationship with Wikipedia, it's very important because Wikipedia is often where people go to get their information. It's a starting point. And Wikipedia, of course, will direct you to other articles. And the writing, the language is so, so very important. In their little, in the little summary on Wikipedia, it gives the date as 2013 to present, location international, largely in the United States, cause racial discrimination against Black people and other minorities. Minorities where? Are we talking about global minorities? I don't think we are. It's okay. It's not a global thing. We know it's not global. It's Western. And it only cares about the West. It doesn't care. People have mentioned countless times. It doesn't care about Black people, the enslavement of Black people, by other Black people, or the enslavement of Black people, by Muslims, for example, whatever. If it's outside the West, it doesn't matter. It doesn't concern them in the slightest. So this we've, we already know. So it's about Western. It's about the Western world and the apparent discrimination that people face at the hands of the state in Western countries. Now, to be clear, there is no lawful discrimination, lawful discrimination among races in the Western world, except against White people. Have a, have a rummage around Tucker Carlson's videos, and you will find one. It's actually just come into my head now. I've only remembered it now. Otherwise, I'd have had it for you. I might rummage it out actually, and quickly show you next week. The distribution of healthcare, the application, if you like, of healthcare in the United States is a long racial grounds. And people at the bottom are White people. So the only in, by the state, the only people being discriminated against by the state are White people. That's, that's the reality of it. And it's because of groups like Black Lives Matter. They will then talk about structural racism. No one quite knows what structural racism is. It's nothing. It's, it's, it's, it's, it's just made it up. Because there is nothing we don't have laws that support the oppression of, of Black people. So they have to make something up. And structural racism is what they've made up. And like I say, no, no, no one knows what it is. Even them don't know what it is. It's just a flim flam rubbish, out of, out of rubbish. But what they actually mean by structural racism is democracy, capitalism. That's what they mean. So the system in the West, the system in Western countries is apparently, just by its very nature, discriminatory against non-White people. You try and ask how that is, or why that is. Just for an example, and you won't get, because again, it's absolute tripe. So that's Black Lives Matter in a nutshell. Whether or not they are violent, and I've been reading and researching about Black Lives Matter most of today, whether or not they are violent is a sort of sticking point for media coverage of them. The media insists that they're not violent. And of course, you have these famous clips that have gone around social media and, and journalists standing in front of flaming cars saying, this is a peaceful point. Oh, absolutely wrong if you're peaceful. They even come out with such, with, with figures. They come out with figures. 93% of Black Lives Matter protesters are peaceful. Where do, where do you get that from? I mean, it's absolutely, 100% complete. Famitism, I suppose, is one way of pulling it. But let me just read you a tiny bit from Wikipedia about them. The movement began in July 2013 with the use of hashtag Black Lives Matter on social media after the acquittal of George Zimmerman, Zimmerman in the shooting death of African American team Trayvon Martin, 17 months earlier in February. It became nationally recognised for street demonstrations following the 2014 deaths of two African Americans, Michael Brown, which resulted in protests and unrest in Ferguson, Missouri, you remember that one, rioting in that city. Since the Ferguson protest, because that seems like a lot, doesn't seem like as long ago was that, does it? It's well, they've been around, they've been doing this for some time. Since the Ferguson protest, participants in the movement have demonstrated against the deaths of numerous other African Americans by police actions, or while in police custody. They do not, however, doesn't say this, but to add to what I said earlier, they do not have much to say about the huge, huge number of Black on Black killings in the United States. It is only when police are involved. And the stats show that in basic numbers, police in America kill more white people than they do Black people, but as a percentage of the population, they do kill more Black people, but Black people are, as a percentage of the population, far more likely to be involved in violent crime. That is just a statistical fact. Their popularity, and here's one I wanted to get onto, their popularity among Americans is apparently dropping. In June 2020, Pew found that 67% of adult Americans expressed support, or some support for Black Lives Matter. Only a few months later, in September 2020, that had dropped to 55%, and according to Wikipedia, it remains steady. Now, there's a denial about violence, and if you stick into our old friend Google, Black Lives Matter violence, what you will find is articles, just an array of articles, about how Black Lives Matter isn't violent. I had to do some research to find one by a guy called Bruce Newsome, and this is written in September 2020, the myth behind BLM's peaceful protest. I'm going to stick, that's a long article, but it's worth, definitely worth a read, because it goes through not only their violence, but how the media covers up that violence. I've just put a link to it there into the comments. Have a read of that. Very much worth reading. But what is going on now? $60 million has gone missing, apparently, and no one in the Black Lives Matter movement seems to know where it's gone. And people who are instrumental in starting this movement are now throwing their hands up and saying, nothing to do with me. You'll see as you read about this organization a sudden appearance of calling it decentralized. I'm not saying it isn't decentralized, but the more recent articles are, the more they've been called decentralized. It probably has something to do. This emphasis on it being a decentralized organization probably has something to do with this. Who is in charge of BLM's $60 million bank role? Black Lives Matter will not confirm who controls its significant funds after founder stepped down and the two activists she appointed to take her place rejected the roles. So what is this story? Charity auditors, this is from the 28th of January 2022, so few weeks ago. Charity auditors have expressed alarm at the management of Black Lives Matter's $60 million in donations. After it emerged that people announced as leading the organization never took up the role and no one seemed able to say who was handling the finances. The most recent tax filing for the charity from 2019, get this one, gives an address in Los Angeles that does not exist. So suddenly no one's in charge. No one quite knows where the $60 million is and they have in their last officialdom, official filling of forms, you know, the bureaucracy, part of life, they gave an address in Los Angeles that doesn't exist. Two remaining BLM directors identified by the Washington Examiner were not able to assist with this with one even scrubbing BLM associations from his social media after he was contacted by the paper. They are yet to file a 2020 return, remember this is this article's from 2022 just a few weeks ago, they are yet to file a 2020 return, a form 990, which could see them fined by the IRS, which is the American tax body. Lori Styron of the Executive Director of Charity Watch said the findings were deeply troubling and they should have filed their 2020 form by now. So it gets better, it gets better. The problem began in May 2021 when BLM co-founder Patrice Coulars stepped down as director of the Black Lives Matter Global Network, the national body representing all individual local chapters. What happened to the decentralization? That's a national body representing individual chapters. This sounds a little bit like a centralized board at the top if you like to me. So what is, what may, what may its original founders be doing with some of the money? In September 2020 Patrice Coulars, one of its founders signed documents with 1,000 currents, transferring 66.5 million into BLM's account. In February 2021 Black Lives Matter confirmed it took in 90 million dollars throughout 2020 distributed to partner organizations but had 60 million remaining in its accounts. Where is it all going? Well, expenses were approximately 8.4 million dollars that includes staffing, operating and administrative costs along with activities such as civic engagement, rapid response and crisis intervention. BLM said at the time they were sharing at the time, this is when they confirmed they had a 19 million dollars taken in 90 million dollars in 2020, BLM said at the time they were sharing the details in a bid to be more transparent admitting that their structure and finances have previously been opaque. But two months later in April 2021 reports began emerging provided by the National Legal and Policy Center which showed that Coulars, Patrice Coulars, one of the people who founded this had amassed a 3.2 million dollar property empire. She owned four properties, three in Los Angeles and one just outside of Atlanta. Many within BLM turned against her questioning where she had accumulated the money. She has, it says written two books, a deal with YouTube and a production deal with Warner Brothers. To me it's not even, it's bad enough that they can't account for 60 million dollars. It's bad enough that they provide an address to officialdom in the US that doesn't exist. It's bad enough that now all of a sudden, I've got nothing to do with me, to the point where someone at least is even taking Black Lives Matter off his social media, all of that is bad enough. But one of the women who founded this thing is buying herself these beautiful big houses worth millions, inexpensive parts of Los Angeles and a beautiful absolutely stunning looking house in Georgia. I thought they were Marxists. I thought theft was, a property was theft. Look, this is, they're communists. This is how it works. Equality, equality, equality. Step one, bring down West, let's go through this. Let's go through who Black Lives Matter actually are. So they are communist Marxists who want to bring down Western civilization as has been the case for Marxist slash communists since, well, a long time. So they dream of bringing down Western civilization because they dream of bringing down capitalism. In order to bring down Western civilization, they must attack its majority population, which is of course, white people. So you have this, they saturate everything and turn everything into an anti-white scenario to such that to the point where the only people who can be legally discriminated against in Western countries are white people. In order to attack white people, they create a narrative, a fictional narrative that Black people are treated absolutely appallingly on a daily basis in Western countries by white people because white people are racist, naturally, you know, it's in the grade. You've even got things like unconscious bias. Even if you're not a racist, you still just don't know you're a racist. So if you don't think you're a racist, it's only that you don't know you are. This, all this sort of stuff is, it's, it's, it's communist tropes have been, been using this, communism has been using this sort of stuff for as long as it's existed. They dress it up as something socially and morally just. So Black Lives Matter. But they are true communists. They want to bring us down and install their ideals instead. Their ideals will be equality, equality, equality, but not for me. And this is the same for communism, wherever it has raised its ugly head. Everyone's equal, except those who aren't equal. And the ones who aren't equal, they will still have their beautiful properties. They will still, they will live far away from the other equals, those equals down there, down at the bottom, those equals down there. They will still live far away. They will live up here. The equal will live down there. There's communism always, always without exception. So they take something which sounds morally right, morally just emotionally blackmail everyone and legally blackmail us now in a variety of ways, but have no intention of being equal. In their ideal society, the most people will be at the bottom equally poor, but they won't be. Because they're communists and that is how communism is. Do you really believe that German Mao lived in the same dire scenario as the people in China were eating their own children? Or the Soviet Union? Do we think the chiefs of the Soviet Union were living in the way that the equals at the bottom of the ladder were living? Equality for thee, not for me. And look at this, expensive properties in exclusive areas in the name of equality. Well, the people who lose their businesses because of their rioting and looting, which apparently they contest, but and the media gives them a completely free reign on it. But we can see, we all have eyes, we can see, we can see the violence and destruction they leave in their path. No matter what lies the police or the press like to tell us. But it more of to date than that. This is from, where am I, the 18th of February. So three days ago, the plot thickens. Amazon suspends Black Lives Matter global network foundation from its charity platform, Amazon Smile, for face failing to disclose where its 60 million dollars in donations has gone. The social justice organization, which has been facing intense scrutiny over financial transparency, will be deprived from funds raised on Amazon Smile until they're back in compliance. A spokesperson told the New York Post. It was unclear how much money had been raised on the platform. The suspension, which was first reported by the Washington Examiner, deprives the Black Lives Matter of revenue from the organization from Amazon Smile, which has provided 306 million dollars to U.S. charities. It comes after charity auditors express alarm at the management of BLM's donations, when no one seemed able to say who is handling the finance and the group's reluctance to release financial records. It's not just reluctance, I'm afraid. Their registered address doesn't exist. It's founding leaders and they're washing their hands and nothing to do with me. But yes, I have bought four expensive properties in the last couple of years, so what? I'm a Marxist. I like to live in exclusive properties in safe, probably largely white areas of the country. What's wrong with that? Unbelievable. But just to bring it home a little bit, police probe into missing Bristol Black Lives Matter fundraising money. So it's not just going on in the United States. This is from August 2021. A woman has been arrested after the youth group did not receive 32,000 raised following the toppling of the statue of Edward Colston. Bristol Live understands that the woman in her 20s was questioned under caution about the money, which was raised before and after the June 7th demo made headlines around the world. The fundraising page set up ahead of Black Lives Matter demonstration. Stration told potential donors the money would be given to changing your mindset. How sinister is that? Imagine, they call it that, changing your mindset. A youth work charity based at the Malcolm X Center in St. Paul's. So they said this was where the money, when they were fundraising, that this is where it would go. But the march took place and in an unplanned event, a breakaway group pulled down the statue of Bristol Slave Trade. Slave Trade, they came and typed Edward Colston and dumped it in the docks. The fundraiser was then inundated with donations and 32,334 was raised in the following week. A spokesperson from changing your mindset confirmed the organization has not received any of the money from the fundraising appeal and a complaint has been made to Avon and Somerset. Police. So I think we know a little bit more about Black Lives Matter. It is so important. So important. Look at how powerful they've been. Look. So important that we campaign against them. 9th of April. You'll hear more from me in the coming weeks. Okay, a couple of questions. I did say that I'd have a look at Crescent and Dick this week and her resignation. She's basically in a nutshell. She's had a falling out with Salih Khan and reading about, reading through various bits and bobs about this today. It's so left-wing. I don't mean to be dismissive of her, but it's just, you think, oh, this is just, it's unbelievable. Unbelievable. Right. So under the leadership of Crescent and Dick, London has become unrecognizable in terms, to me anyway. And it's a city I lived in for years and I loved it. I still love it. It's still, you can't just stop loving a place as special as London, but it has become, in many areas, many parts of it, extremely dangerous. And violence, gun violence, knife violence, gang violence has grown rapidly in recent years in London. And Salih Khan has also overseen this, but in the midst of this increase in violence under the leadership of both of them, Salih Khan and Crescent and Dick. The police manage to spare enough officers to have hate crime units and all sorts of rubbish. In the middle of a knife crime epidemic, the police are putting huge amounts of resources into hate. But even without that in mind, it is what got Salih Khan really angry, not the explosion in violent crime, but racist, misogynist and homophobic messages. I'm not making any judgment on what the police have been exchanging or what messages and WhatsApp and what have you exchanged between police officers. What I am going to comment on though is how political this is. Knife crime, violence, nothing. Racist, misogynist and homophobic messages. That is a step too far for Salih Khan purely because it gives him, it's more wokeness, it gives him a chance to be woke again. And they are blaming each other for him to blame horror for the state of the Metropolitan Police is a way of deflecting from himself the state of London under his, who gets to do two things, he gets to pretend that the explosion of violence in London is not his fault. That's his, believe me that hasn't passed him by, he's doing that. He's going to deflect onto horror. There's butters each other but he's going to deflect onto horror and bonus points he gets to be all woke and complain about racist and homophobic messages. So he's upwoking himself while deflecting all blame from himself onto Cressida Dick, political theatre of the worst kind. And while those two are engaged in political theatre, the violence continues and neither of them would, well she's not now because she's gone but neither of them are going to do anything about that. This is what we're governed by. Why on earth we put up with it as a country, as a society, why we put up with this is one of life's great mysteries, fear probably. Okay, let me answer some questions. What do I think? Hi John, I hope you're doing well. What do you think of the propaganda getting used in relation to Russia and Ukraine? It's extraordinary how the press fires this stuff up. I remember, I think I mentioned it last week actually, the president of Ukraine saying if you've got anything, if you, you know, we're talking about Russia and vading on Wednesday. And this poor guy, this guy is, stop it, stop doing this. You're causing a panic in my country. If you've got any evidence that Putin intends to invade on Wednesday, please let me have it. They are absolutely, absolutely pushing, you know, storing this up as much as they possibly can. A, because they've rotten to the core, B, because it's Biden. Biden seems to want war. These horrible globalist western leaders want war. They certainly like throwing petrol on the flames. These western, these globalist western leaders, people like Biden are Boris Johnson. So the press is, is giving, creating among the public mind, within the public mind, infusing Biden's desire for war for whatever reason into people justifying it. So again, you've got, you've got Biden over here and you've got the press doing his bidding, which is making people panic, making people think that Putin is on the, on the verge of, in any case, I fail to see what it has to do, particularly with Boris Johnson. What's it got to do with you? Look after your own border for a change. Look after your own country for a change. The press is doing Biden's bidding on this. Of that, I have no doubt at all. Should we have heavy sentences for corrupt policemen? I would like to see them. Absolutely. Obviously it depends on the level of corruption. But absolutely, I would, I think a lot of people would like to see them held to account at all, any kind of punishment. Before we get to heavy sentences, any kind of punishment, but there's not. And largely, to my mind, because there's no public accountability. The police, police is the police. The rotten establishment holds itself to account. The public are not to have no say in all this. I really, one of our policies is I really believe in it, that we must have a way. And I'm not talking about judicial review, which is sort of all hoity-toity and costs a lot of money. And I'm talking about where Joe soap down the road can with his friends and neighbours have an ability to hold powerful public sector people to account. They don't, at the moment. They really don't. Because the establishment polices itself. There's a huge problem with accountability. But yes, depending on, for example, covering up for taking bribes from grooming gangs, they should be in the next cell, in my mind, and for the same length of time. Absolutely disgusting. And the politicians with them. Do you think other countries will follow England and drop in COVID rules? Or do they think Boris is just trying to save his ass? I think Boris is trying to save his ass. It's amazing, isn't it? It just all seems to have gone away. Absolutely incredible. Oh, I want to move on to, 10 minutes left. So I want to move down to this one. I'll cover COVID again on Wednesday night with Rumble. So we'll go into that in a little bit more detail. But yes, I do think as you put it. And I think others are probably looking at this country and thinking Boris isn't quite reading the script. Do you know, someone said to me recently, I wish people wouldn't call him Boris. I've sort of got into the habit of it now. Because it makes him sound and seem somewhat harmless if you call him by his first name. Really good point. Did you hear about the EU suggesting a new Brexit referendum because of NI protocol? That's something actually, let me, I'm going to cover that properly. But it hasn't, it hasn't gone away. They're not going to stop demonising Brexit, trying to find a way back, which actually wouldn't be technically probably too difficult. But I've written that one down because I do actually want to come back to that one. I'll come back to it next week. Should, this is one I wanted to address. Should British politicians be condemning Trudeau and the Canadian government? It is absolutely unbelievable what is happening in Canada. Unbelievable. I covered it somewhat in my rumble stream last week, and I will again this week, will be keeping, I'm going to keep it closed. It could actually be a massive, massive historical event, this. And these people, these protesters in Canada are so brave and so important. This could be a majorly historic story. And Trudeau has shown, even while Merkel was still in charge of Germany, even then I still thought and think Justin Trudeau is the worst leader of any western country and there is some stiff competition for that one. He is awful. And he's shown himself during this, in recent events in Canada, they've shown them, they've shown some, actually they've given so much away. The power of the big tech giants threatening to freeze bank accounts of protesters, calling protesters, Nazis and fascists. I believe he said a few people waving swastikas about. He is utterly, utterly vile. And let's not forget that we still have some formal connections with Canada. And those formal connections, to answer your questions specifically, those formal connections should be being used to absolutely condemn the treatment of protesters in Canada, the smearing and demonization of protesters in Canada and above all to condemn this little warm Justin Trudeau. He is the epitome of globalist shill. There are some famous pictures of him. You can just see it. You can see how he's a Klaus Schwab Bill Gates disciple. No backbone, no principle, complete and absolute operator for the globalist machine. To my mind, the 100% the worst leader in the Western world and like I say, that is saying something. And yes, 100% this country needs to speak up and do something, do something. We talk about all sorts of sanctions for Ukraine. It's got nothing to do with us. Actually Canada does have something to do with us. If I was in Parliament, I would certainly be standing up and condemning it. And I would be questioning and embarrassing the government as to why it has nothing to say about what's going on in Canada. A country with close and formal alliances with this country go completely insane about Ukraine or various different issues around the world and always on its soapbox. The Western countries always on their soapbox when it suits them about freedoms and freedom to protest and press freedoms and where are they now? Nowhere to be seen because it doesn't suit them politically to condemn Justin Trudeau. Get me into Parliament and I will. I'd like to know what Black Lives Matter are doing about present day slavery. Nothing, Mandy, nothing at all. There's a comment in here which I'd like to know a little bit more about. It starts with that's 2.4 million mainly disabled people like myself who missed out on the uplift. I need a bit more information about that one. Let me move on just a little bit. I've only got a couple of minutes. Question. Hi, Stu. I'm now another member of Epstein's Peter Ring has allegedly hung himself while the CCTV was on holiday. Is it time for the manufacturer of prison sheets to be investigated? Casual willy-nilly. No, I won't say tasteless jokes. Maybe it's time for better CCTV. Michael, sorry for going off topic, what has for Britain an opinion on Ukraine? Not off topic at all, Michael, a perfectly reasonable question. In the times that I've addressed Ukraine, a couple of things. I want the UK to stay out of it. It isn't our business. That's point number one. Point number two. In what I can find, and I mean, all I've got to go on largely is the press and we know that that's, if you keep going, you might find some independent publications and we'll take another view. But even in the mainstream press, I struggle to find anything representing the opinions of Ukrainian people. The only thing you can really see repeated is that the president of Ukraine is telling the West to please stop, Western media to please stop storing this up. You're causing panic inside my country. So the only thing I can really hear about the opinions of Ukrainians themselves is coming from the president who says you're starting panic inside my country. Some journalists have noted the lack or the, when they do speak to Ukrainians, Ukrainians are saying nobody seems to care what we think. By which I mean the relationship between Moscow and Ukraine. They have close links, old links and it may well be, it may well be that there are many Ukrainians who want a close relationship with Moscow. Their membership or potential membership, and of course we want one of the things we know that Putin wants reassurances is that Ukraine will not be a member of NATO. The opinions of Ukrainian people on that don't seem to be forthcoming either. So what we have is a Western press storing it up at Biden's behest or at least in partnership with Biden. Storing this up when this is, and the voice of the Ukrainian people seemingly missing from all of this, but as the United Kingdom, I wish the very best for the people of Ukraine, but in the United Kingdom, we have so much wrong here that this is where our attentions should be. We do not need to be getting involved in storing up, storing up tensions is a polite way of putting it between Russia and Ukraine and we don't need to be poking Vladimir Putin either. Let's look after our country. Last one, this is from Adam. Do you know that the government's proposed human rights reform bill would harass so-called anti-vaxxers even threatening to jail anyone who refuses to take the job? I mentioned this briefly, any reform to the Human Rights Act will, the Tories are doing what they do, which is throwing out a little bit for actual conservatives, trying to pretend that they intend to bring the abuses and the criminals charter that the Human Rights Act has become, trying to bring that to an end. They do nothing of the kind. They will continue to allow foreign nationals to commit crimes in this country with absolutely no repercussions and if they do reform the Human Rights Act, you're absolutely right. It is more likely to take away rights than give them and the Human Rights Act has done nothing to protect our rights, our right to freedom of speech, our right to freedom of protest, the most important democratic political rights we have. It has done nothing at all to protect them. All it has done is keep every Tom Dick and Harry who from anywhere in the world who commits no matter how appalling a crime, keep them here at taxpayer's expense, that's what the Human Rights Act does. So if there are reforms to it, it won't be in favour of our freedoms. The Tories we know have no intention whatsoever of protecting our freedoms and we know that because the Tories are taking our freedoms away. Okay, thank you very much everyone. That is, we're over time for this evening. Thanks very much for joining me. Thank you for your comments. Thank you for your questions. Ninth of April, put it in your diary. You'll hear, like I say, you'll hear from me. In the meantime with more, Telford Saturday, this coming Saturday, I'll be telling the people of Telford what we intend to do with Grumman gangs. Give Sharon a shout on inquiries at forbriton.uk if you want to come along. And next week I'm going to address, I'm going to address that Brexit question that came up but also candidates. Why, I will answer questions for any questions about being a candidate, any concerns about being a candidate, I'll address them next week and on Rumble on Wednesday night I'll have a look at. We'll continue with this and see where it goes. We'll cover this every week. So what's going on in Canada? I think I say I think it could be, could be really quite important, could be quite a significant event in world history. Let's see. Quite a surprise for it to be Canada. Good on them. Good on these protesters. They are very, very, very important in the current globalist climate and Trudeau is... Thanks everyone. I shall see you Rumble 8 o'clock on Wednesday. Back here live next Monday at 8 o'clock. Thank you as always. Take care of yourselves and I'll see you soon.