 What's going on back there? I felt like you don't have any neighbors back there. I don't. Well, what's going on in the bushes? You see? There's a lot of movement going on back there. I had to follow your mom. Hey, welcome back to our stupid reaction to you, kids. Corbin, Rick, and you can follow us on Instagram, and Twitter, on our juicy content. Yeah. And I think we're supposed to have some Patreon and follow us on Twitter, too. Today. The monsters are coming. Sweet. But today, I'm going to guess. What? We're going to react to something. No bummer. Yeah. All right. This is a little, uh, little, uh, little, uh, little shindig? Little interview style thing. Oh. It's called can women leaders make the world a more peaceful place? The answer is yes. So though we're done. But it's by that, uh, say this name? The Sadguru. Do you remember? Yes. You remember? Isn't Sadguru the guy that, when we were doing the Agori? Agori thing, and he was talking, being interviewed? Yes. Yes. So can women leaders make the world more peaceful? The answer to that question is yes. Ariana Huffington. Do you know who that is? I do. Who's that? That's Ariana Huffington. The Huffington Post. Like her family outfit? Yeah. That's like their name. That's like her paper. Oh, really? I may be wrong, but I think I'm right. Well, I didn't even know paper was still around. Yes. There's this archaic thing called the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times. And they still make paper Corbin. Here we go. Would we have more peaceful world? No. Thank you so much, everybody. So that was a question from the audience for them. I actually think that right now, women have a big responsibility to lead. Women have a big responsibility to lead a lot of it, and transformation that's happening around how we define success, how to define work. Because basically, the world as it is now has been designed by men, and it's not working. Well put. That's true. Factually correct. Good men were very necessary. That's great. But if you think of it, we had the first women's revolution, which was women getting the vote. The second women's revolution, which was led by the free down in the States and Gloria Steinem, which was basically having access to every job, but equal pay, every position at the top of every field. And now I think there is a third women's revolution, which is redefining what success and work are. So instead of simply saying, I want to be at the top with you, where you are, just saying, this is really the best way to run a business. This is the best way to run our world. And women are saying, no. Many, many women are saying, we need to actually change the corporate structure in which we are competing, change the political world in which we are competing, not just compete on the terms that men created. And you know what? When these changes happen and they are happening, men are going to be incredibly grateful. I think people laugh. We want to believe that. Not all men will be grateful if women step in the making of life in the very nature in which we are. There is something called as masculine and feminine. It's really good. Unfortunately, we have created a world where our idea of success and well-being is all well-being masculine. I'm not allowed to understand. I'm not talking about male and female. I'm talking about masculine and feminine. A man is capable of being as feminine as he wishes to be in terms of his thought, in terms of his emotion, when he wishes to be. Similarly, a woman is as capable as a man to be as masculine as she wishes when the situation demands or when such actions are needed. Right now, we have created education systems which are purely masculine, which is producing women also. Whether you like it or not, unfortunately, the idea of success has become masculine. True. Those who want to be successful, even if they're women, they're becoming like this, yeah, which is a serious damage to humanity. If you take away the feminine from the world, everything that's gentle, everything that's beautiful, everything that's aesthetic, everything that is the subtler aspect of life will disappear and only providing and survival aspect of life will exist. Right now, there is a serious concern about this. 25 years ago, in a normal conversation, nobody would think it's worthwhile discussing economy, isn't it? We talked about the weather. We talked about juicy things in the town. We never talked about the economy. Today in every conversation, everybody is talking about the economy. Economy means livelihood. Economy means providing. This is purely masculine in nature. I'm not saying women cannot provide. I'm not meaning men and women. I'm talking about masculine and feminine. If you make the society so overwhelmingly masculine, you will obliterate the feminine. In this, everything that's gentle and beautiful will vanish, even in a woman. Because when you set the standards that this is the only way you can succeed, even she will adapt to the situation, which I feel they are adapting. And many women are expressing their masculinity much more stronger and cruder than a man. It is happening. This is distressing because if I'm allowed to share something from my life, you know, those days when we were growing up, my father is a physician. He is the provider. My mother never earned a rupee in her life, but it was never such a thing that if she does not earn, she's something less. No, she was the most valuable person. As a child, when I look back and see, with all your respect, when I look back and see in the way my life evolved, I could very easily live without my father, but I cannot imagine my life without my mother. She never earned anything, but that's not the point. Where the money came from didn't make a difference, but how it was done in the home was everything. I must tell you the simple things. She did everything in the house from stitching to embroidering to cooking to everything because she wouldn't want anybody else to do it for her husband and children. She wants to do it herself. If we travel somewhere, if we have to sleep, if she saw an empty pillowcase, you know, when you travel somewhere else with just white pillowcases, she would say, how can children sleep on empty pillowcases? And she would pull out her needle and thread right there in five minutes she stitched a small little parrot or a flower. This little green parrot, I stared and I slept. It is so deep in my consciousness today, that little green parrot, because that sense of that caring, I think that little green parrot sank so deep into me and in many ways who I am today is a manifestation of that little green parrot that she stitched on that pillowcase. This is feminine. I'm not saying everybody has to embroider, but I am saying that sense, that sense of concern is feminine and this needs to happen in the system of yoga. When you, you know, the hatha yoga is a common word being used everywhere without knowing the meaning generally. Hatha means, ha means sun, ta means moon. That means balancing the masculine and the feminine within yourself. Only when these two things are properly balanced within you, you are a full-fledged human being, otherwise you're a lopsided human being. The adi yogi who is the originator of yoga, I know in California you think it's Madonna who did it. I don't know who these people are. Adi yogi is symbolized at the ultimate symbol of man and how he is symbolized is all the images are one half of him is women, another half is man. He is the ultimate man, but one half is woman, another half is man because a true human being is an equal balance between masculine and feminine and in workplaces, I don't see why gender should even be an issue. Why should you always look at somebody as a man or a woman? You can just look at them as a human being or as a piece of life. Well, no, I absolutely appreciate the things that they both said. I just didn't necessarily, I heard an ancillary answer to the question, but not a direct answer to the question in any way, shape or form in terms of can women leaders make the world more peaceful? I think the ancillary answer based on their answers is a resounding yes, but there wasn't a direct correlation. It was more about women and men, especially from Sadguru's vantage point of the balance of the masculine and the feminine, which obviously I understood what he was saying. I know you did too. He wasn't talking male-female, he was talking feminine and masculine qualities and traits, but it didn't seem to answer the person's question who asked about do you think that women leaders would make the world more peaceful? Did you get that? I got it as an ancillary, but not a direct. Yeah, but I feel like that's pretty common when people with a lot of esteem that they broadly answer a big question instead of answering the little question. No, it didn't bother me, right? That bothers me in terms of the whole point of that was to answer that person's question. Well, I think he was saying that, well, I just thought it was kind of obvious what he was saying. I don't think you need to see him that way. I don't think he needs to flat out say it. Well, for me, I just, if someone asks you that question, no, I just, and I'm not saying they said this, but oftentimes in a situation like that, when you're platformed and you talk, you say things that you just are thinking about versus that seemed to be an open forum where someone asked a question. And then when I'm in a situation like that, when I hear someone ask a question and they don't get an answer, my thought is did you hear the question? Because I didn't really feel they talked about can women make the world a more peaceful place? Did you? I think we got it by the end of it, but I don't know. As an ancillary? Yeah, I don't. You're gonna feel the Nazis, we're upset by that. It's like, I don't care about an ancillary answer. Like I think the answer he gave was brilliant and true. Oh, I loved what he said about the masculine. That's why I don't really care because that's, I got what he was saying in the end. I don't need a specific, because it would be actually, well, for me, all you have to do is you have to think about it less. You'd be like, can women, yes. Right, but therein lies, therein lies, the answer to, when you have an answer to that question, within the answer come the solutions. So, in other words, if the answer to that question is yes, then why don't we implement that answer in order to make the world a more peaceful place? And you don't get those answers unless you directly answer the question is what my point is. Cool. So, I just, I was here to talk about what he actually said. Yeah, and what he said was true about the masculine and the feminine, but it wasn't an answer to the question. Okay. I think you're getting in your head again, Rick. I don't get it. You sometimes latch on to something and it bugs you to your core for some reason. Just let it be, Rick, it's okay. I'm very low. I could have just edited out the first part and you wouldn't have heard the question and it would have been funny. If you didn't, and I didn't hear the question, I would have thought, my next spot would have been, what were they talking about? What was this about? Was this a forum on women? I think these are enlightened people. That's what it's supposed to be. It's supposed to be, they're enlightened. I don't know. I don't know a lot of enlightened people, so. They're smart and they talk all smart like, right? So, but for me, if the smartness doesn't turn into a practical application that's of no use. Well, he can't change the entire world, Rick, by himself. I'm asking him to change the whole world. Oh my God, you could have just appreciated the speech. I did! I was pointing out that it didn't seem to answer the question. It did. You got the answer, didn't you? Doesn't matter. How you got it, you got it. Well, no. Oh my God. Example, when you were doing algebra, was getting the answer good enough? Yeah, it was. No, it wasn't. You had to show the word. How did you come to that answer and why did you come to that answer? I always thought they were stupid. I could just come up with it in my head. Why do I need to show my work? I always hated that, so that's not a good example. I always hated showing my work. I was like, I can do it all in my head. Oh, I don't like it either. But there's a point behind showing the word. Yeah, because you're stupid. No, it's related to absolutes and stuff. And I'm not negating, I told you. I really appreciated. I absolutely appreciated and agreed with his statements about the balance of the feminine, the masculine, and how the feminine without it and why it's negated. The other thing I don't understand is why we can't celebrate the differences, because yes, at the same time, I think there should be equality, but there are some roles in society, whether they're vocational or they're just recreational or they're in family life, that are definitively supposed to be done by women and supposed to be done by men. And there's no problem with that being just that's something a woman does and that's something a man does, and it should be celebrated that way. I don't think he was talking about men and women. He was talking about masculine and feminine. No, he was. I transitioned that over to, because at the end he did. At the end he was talking about the word. If you want to do something you can do, it doesn't matter you gender. That's not true. That's true. Have a baby, Corbin. I did.