 Your argument in the preceding posts indicates that you probably don't understand social epistemology, which means your book on epistemology is probably going to be bad. So the rational, reasonable inference based on the evidence available to me is that you are a self-delusional crackpot. However, I'm willing to take a risk and read your work, but only if you compensate me for the opportunity cost of my time. Is it worth your time to read a book on philosophy that was published outside of academia? You just heard the answer of Jason Brennan, who is an associate professor of philosophy at Georgetown University. We're talking about my book, Square One, The Foundations of Knowledge. I'm Steve Patterson, I'm a philosopher working outside of academia, and I think ideas should be judged on their merit regardless of where they come from. Jason kindly offered to read and review my book for a fee. He says so, $1,000, and I will read it and write an honest review. I will even try to publish the review in a few journals. If that fails, I will post it on Bleeding Heart Libertarians. I might be able to succeed in getting it in a journal because I have quite a bit of clout and insider status that you despise. Well Jason, I accept your kind offer, and let's let the ideas speak for themselves.