 I would do concordance online, of course. No. The concordance would only help you with the same things that are concerning the same thing. It would put them all in one row. I know. It helps you to find stuff. That's correct. That's great. But it ain't going to find... It is their life in the universe except for Earth. It ain't going to find that. What the hell's the matter with you? You sure as well insist that the Bible says that? Because I've read all the scriptures pertaining to those situations. But the concordance is not going to find me that. It'll find you a bunch of scriptures, maybe that point in that direction. That's all. But you can't go around saying things like, I don't believe that. I don't believe... You haven't read the book? How do you do that? I mean... Where's the difference between you and a stupid, zealot, the religious right wing dummy who says the same thing? I'm defending science. Where? Science hasn't proved that. You ever watch Ancient Aliens? That's not science. Of course it is. They're full of the top scientists. When they speak, they're speaking speculation. They do not know anything about life on another planet. They're showing a hell of a lot of deductive reasoning evidence. Archaeological evidence. You've got archaeological evidence on other planets? No, they're going back into all the cultures. So how does that prove life on another planet? How does that prove life on another planet? By all the sightings that were reported. How does that prove life on another planet? Of any kind. But they have more... Even bacteria. I'll accept bacteria. But they have more proof than religion does. Fine. Then accept there what you're saying is proof. But don't go saying the Bible is wrong. How the hell can you say that? I want to see... Having not read it. Because you're insisting that it says that. And I want to see... I'm not insisting that. I said many scriptures pulled together say that. Not one scripture. There is no life on another planet. Except on Earth. There's no one scripture in the Bible says that. How do you come to that conclusion? I just explained it how many times. The Bible is here a little, there a little. You must take all the scriptures on one subject. And then you will find out. Your deductive reasoning says that. Anybody's deductive reasoning. Okay. Continue. I say no. Continue. You can't say that. I say that's your interpretation. No. That's not acceptable. What about the verse that says absence from the body, presence with the Lord. You said, oh, Ken is wrong. Yeah, about what? What does that mean? God hates the flesh. Absence from the body, present with the Lord. Flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of heaven. It means that you're somewhere else. No, it doesn't. It's just what I just said. God hates the flesh. Flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God. That's all it means. It doesn't mean that you're absent from the body. You're closer to God. But how are you absent from the body? Death. You're not a spear being. If you're deaf, you know nothing. Well, for you to be absent from the body means that something in you is absent from the body. Exiting of the body. So how does that bring any closer to God? Well, if you're absent from the body is present with the Lord that means something. Who said that? How can you be absent from your body and present in the Lord when you have not yet been resurrected? Oh, I'm sorry. Let's go back to the soul idea. Soul, yeah. The immortal soul idea. Soul food. Which is a concept, by the way, from religious nuts. Who haven't read the Bible? You got some nerve to think that there is no other life forms anywhere else. Stop saying, I think it. I just said, who thinks it? No other life forms? The Bible. It's Clifton number two giving me the stare down. Alright, continue. Where did dogs first arrive on the scene? Scientists have long debated that question and now a study of doggy DNA from around the world is pointing to central age. Man's best friend may have evolved somewhere near what is now Nepal and Mongolia. Pre-studies have suggested Southern China. The Middle East, Siberia and Europe as the first place where our first domesticated animal arose from wolves at least 15,000 years ago. I read a textbook about that very subject and they went even farther back. They showed some ferret looking animal from Africa and they branched off. One became canine, one became feline but yeah, it only makes sense like the African wild dog the wolf just like the bob cat they tie in the bob cat the ocelot different small cats to the domesticated cat. For the new work Adam Boyko of Cornell University and others analyzed DNA from 549 dogs that represented 38 countries in Africa the Americas Asia, Europe, India and the Middle East and islands north and east of Australia. The animals were not house pets. They were village dogs that wandered freely in the streets or fields. The researchers examined the DNA for signals of where the dogs had the most ancient roots. That pointed to central Asia. The analysis did not tackle the contentious question of when the dogs appeared. Results were reported in a paper released on Monday by the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Even Boyko doesn't think his work will end the debate among scientists. I'm not pretending my study alone is enough to rally the community together. He's right. Robert Wayne of the University of California Los Angeles who proposed a European origin for dogs in 2013 based on analysis of ancient DNA said he didn't buy the conclusion about central Asia. In an email he questioned Boyko's use of modern-day genetic material as a guide to the distant past. Another expert Gregor Larson of Oxford University called the paper a major step forward but said he also suspected that modern DNA is not the way to go. Now that central Asia has been added to the mix everyone with a favorite region can point to at least one paper that supports their suspicions. Larson is involved in an international project to tackle the question with ancient DNA and anatomical comparisons. Boyko said that that research will provide an important test of his own work. You see, it reminds me of this question I asked of the dog breeders that I never got a reply. Now the English Bulldog which I happen to like very much is my favorite breed the English Bulldog of today you know the one shown at the Westminster dog show, right? It's not the original English Bulldog that was used for cruel sport of bull baiting. Now that dog was more athletic and what happened is when they outlaw bull baiting the athleticism they went for the exaggerated features instead of athleticism. So my question was why don't you just dig up some of the champion original English Bulldogs from the grave and try to find good DNA in the bone marrow and clone one nobody answers you know what I mean? It's like it's so easy it's like trying to bring back the Tasmanian tiger that is extinct you try to find they would rather bring back a T-Rex not a Bulldog what's the start Jurassic Park Jurassic Park I know chickens they found good DNA in Montana of T-Rex DNA and being that the bird is the word being that the bird is the word in the closest living relative to dinosaurs they wanted to put the DNA in fertile chicken eggs try to bring back the T-Rex Jurassic Park scientists in movies they always do the wrong thing well they like mad science mad alright well I don't think Goldblum was mad when he first started out with the fly he had good intentions that's great but all roads to room are paved with good intentions road to heaven road to hell road to hell road to hell are paved with good intentions road to hell are paved with good intentions that's an old saying in a very accurate one too unfortunately I mean look at the island of Dr. Moreau you need a better GPS for that because there would be nothing at the end of that road well it shows it shows the corruptibility well it's a saying well a saying is a saying it should be based on accurate facts the corruptibility of human nature or the inability to see consequences ahead of what you're doing well if you have good intentions to start and you become down a road you become overwhelmed by greed you know I'm sure Thomas Edison had good intentions before Rockefeller and J.P. Morgan started waving money under his nose I'm sure he originally had good intentions who knows yeah you know who knows because you told me yourself all men are all people on this earth are evil Bingo I'm glad you said that I'm glad you admitted it people are scum we are all evil there is none that is good that's also what the Bible says I'm talking about people selling out I'm not talking about it I'm talking about in you no selling out did you tell me that if somebody weighed enough dough in front of your nose that you might think is selling out the newspaper I mean the newsletter no it has nothing to do with the newsletter Anderson Cooper it has to do with you becoming corrupt Anderson Cooper why do you keep on saying no when I say something synonymous well what you say you say to me oh no that's not it now Anderson Cooper started off progressive then he came out of the closet so big deal he became a game progressive news anchor or whatever you want to call him journalist journalist that's a problem then he sold out with the people who made that perception he was never a progressive why would anybody he pretended to be one whatever but that's a problem with us Hillary pretended and that's a problem with us isn't it because we're not perceiving this people don't do their homework they don't do their research well you don't want to study the Bible you think I'm going to read that humongous book page by page to try to find what you were insisting on before five times with books of notes oh you and your notes and writing it's not for everybody well then you can't say what you say Mr. Wordsworth you see what I'm saying Mr. Wordsworth it's not for everybody then you can't say what you say that there is a different form of I didn't say there were humanoids out there don't try to change it you actually wanted to speak for the Bible you think there's no bacteria on Mars hogwash I didn't say I think I said the Bible says and I wish if they brought back they found water I think on Mars they have, Mars has polar caps all they got to do is say we got bacteria from the rover we have bacteria from Mars and I'm going to tease the dickens out of you sir I'm going to tease you it's not me it's the Bible why are you putting me all right so the bacteria is phony if the rover brings back bacteria in a rock from Mars then the bacteria then it's a lie then the Bible's wrong and if it's wrong about that one thing it's wrong about all the other things why is it so bad that there might be fungi or bacteria on Mars why is that a bad thing you're not getting the point I don't think it's bad I think it's exciting my argument was the Bible said so period that's it no room for nothing else now if you read the Bible and came up with something else you can say oh no no the Bible does say it here and there if you haven't then you can't speak on that subject no room for nothing else got you well if you speak on subjects you don't know about it you create yourself as a fool not if I am telling you what science articles say I'm not a fool if you're believing that but they got a lot of it it's not all theory not what you said not what you said is proven at all period it's all speculation I don't think they actually in a tangible way have the bacteria from Mars no kidding and they will not have any now is that arrogance and they will not have any is that arrogance yeah you're an arrogant you're an arrogant German American you're arrogant yes you are arrogant but I didn't say that oh you didn't oh the Bible said your interpretation you still stand by your interpretation stop bringing the personal into things like that it is not my interpretation the Bible interprets itself some things in the Bible are plain as the nose on your face other things have to be deciphered they may be in another place here a little and there a little gotcha you have to put it together it's a jigsaw puzzle gotcha it is not for those who are lazy or don't want to read it or do the homework it is not for them they should just walk away and not enter into the the debate J between you the cat, mama cat and Clifton boy this is Clifton is over with hours of time no he he looked perturbed because he didn't come in when he came in and he came in somebody must have told him to come in at that time nobody did I mean it was totally he was supposed to be here two days ago oh then that's his fault why are you making it personal then that's his fault you and the crumb buns not you but the crumb buns in this neighborhood alright oh he's supposed to be here two days ago and he didn't come he figured I'd be here alone he didn't know he didn't know that you have an agenda he thought you were just hanging out and watching TV on a Sunday I know the average person the average person doesn't get involved in important things I know adaptive supporters the first democratic presidential debate of the 2016 cycle was far from a complete and utter route Bernie Sanders more than held his own and presented a real challenge to Hillary Clinton a key ideological difference between the two candidates is that Sanders has no ties to Wall Street or big money interests Super PAC money Sanders is a candidate who represents the interests of working families yeah right that's true it is a gross overstatement for Bloomberg news columnist John Heilman to characterize the outcome of the democratic presidential debate as an out by Hillary Clinton there is serious doubt whether she was even the victor she gets great she gets huge contributions from some of the media many of the mass media pundits who made that declaration had in April written off Bernie Sanders as an outlier and aired again in June by dismissing the same power of Donald Trump in the first democratic presidential debate Sanders unquestionably won tremendous accolades for clearly articulating points that render him the top contender for the presidents after the debate an associate entered at alternate.org recognized that Sanders won the CNN focus group the fusion focus group and the Fox News focus group in the latter he even converted several Hillary supporters he won the slate online poll CNN time online poll 9 news Colorado the street online poll Fox 5 poll the conservative drudge online poll and the liberal daily calls online poll there wasn't to this associate editor's knowledge a poll he didn't win by at least 18 points Sanders was the debate winner if not the majority of the debate audience complete and utter routes mobs the floor with the field we couldn't possibly have been watching the same debate I thought Bernie Sanders was by far the most authentic candidate on the stage he projected an honest force and intensity when talking about the issues the middle class working families are most interested in while Hillary Clinton's performance passable in navigating her several potentially negative issues in a polished lawyerly way Sanders was the one who exhibited an intense truly held conviction about the issues he raised his honesty and integrity showed in the high point of the evening when he came to Clinton's defense in condemning the focus on her damn emails as a diversion from the important issues facing the middle class he was clearly the one he didn't want the email topic to suck up too much valuable time what went in reality I mean maybe he probably knew she was going to go for Congress for this hearing he just didn't want it to become the issue well it is still yeah while people are cheering for the way she's handling it but it's not over I'm trying to think of Chris Christie cut the funding on something recently asked to do a food I'm trying to think what it was Christie is always cutting funding for anything that helps there is boys oh yeah he gave another big break he's always doing that he does it at the same time he'll cut funding for the middle class and the poor the mainstream of New Jersey and then he'll he'll give the money to his rich friends and then they create jobs in China and the trickle down is really in China and Chris Christie got re-elected and the person who really gives a shit about the people did not get elected Barbara Bono and people still complain about Christie and I told them I don't want to hear it on the New Jersey working families whatever Facebook page I don't want to hear complaining and crying because you did not bother to get behind Barbara Bono and elector you re-elected Christie you complain during the first term of Chris Christie you re-elected Chris Christie and you're still complaining about him that's it and of course if you don't vote you have no right to bitch you want to end it here one of your light subjects I have been with my boyfriend for almost five years lately he seems to want to meet up or hang out with more girls than usual hang out no it doesn't work that way there is no male and female friends if you're seriously involved he has always had female friends throughout our relationship some of whom he previously even had sex with but they displayed nothing more than just a friendship and acted as if nothing ever happened how do you do that how do you have a platonic friendship and then have sex like it was a handshake and then just go back to being platonic I always wonder how that happens I feel like the guy is he's got the cavorca he's got the lure of the animal I was comfortable and okay with these friendships but isn't meeting new girls kind of like finding a new date yes or does he just want friends outside the relationship are they mostly girls I don't feel the need to meet other people I'm comfortable focusing on our relationship is this a sign that he is bored it's a sign that he's messing around and both and could be bored Amy's answer