 Let's see, this is some super chat and we'll go back. Why did Paul Krugman change the title of this article from how many people did Iron Man kill to when libertarianism goes wrong? Does that show we have a voice in the culture? Yeah, it wasn't Paul who changed it. It was the New York Times who changed it. So the New York Times changed it. New York Times came under pressure. A lot of people wrote in. A lot of people wrote to Paul Krugman and he acknowledged it in a tweet that people are telling him that he's misrepresenting Iron Man and she was a more sophisticated thinker. And he said he doesn't know, but his point still stands. But then the New York Times, I think forced to say it. So yeah, I do think we have a voice in the culture. You know, I think we have a much bigger voice in the culture that people think. It's not influential yet. It's not a voice that people are listening to except at the margin yet, but it's out there. I mean, I think I told you that I was told, for example, that there were people in the Trump White House listening to you on Brook Show, in spite of my attacks on Donald Trump. So I don't know who it was. I don't know how senior they were or anything, but yeah, with that, they certainly, a lot of people in this administration know I ran no objectivism, even know who I am. So I think we have a bigger presence and a bigger influence in the culture than we think. Just like Ayn Rand herself had a massive influence in the culture, even though she didn't win elections, she didn't change, you couldn't see it. But in subtle ways, the way people in those days, you know, in the 70s, I'd say, switched to be more pro-capitalism was, I think, because of Ayn Rand, you know, the attitude that it's okay, you know, the me generation that was okay to pursue my own happiness, the whole self-help movement, a lot of that, the self-esteem movement, even though it was perverted, were movement generated by, I think, you know, an influence of Ayn Rand on the culture, not at a deep level yet, but at some level. What we need today, what I call the new intellectual, would be any man or woman who is willing to think. Meaning, any man or woman who knows that man's life must be guided by reason, by the intellect, not by feelings, wishes, wins, or mystic revelations. Any man or woman who values his life and who does not want to give in to today's cult of despair, cynicism, and impotence and does not intend to give up the world to the dark ages and to the role of the collectivist, broods. All right, before we go on, reminder, please like the show. We've got 163 live listeners right now, 30 likes, that should be at least 100. I figure at least 100 of you actually like the show. Maybe they're like 60 of the Matthews out there who hate it, but at least the people who are liking it, you know, I want to see a thumbs up, there you go. Start liking it, I want to see that go to 100. All it takes is a click of a thing, whether you're looking at this, and you know the likes matter. It's not an issue of my ego, it's an issue of the algorithm. The more you like something, the more the algorithm likes it. So, you know, and if you don't like the show, give it a thumbs down. Let's see your actual views being reflected in the likes, but if you like it, don't just sit there, help get the show promoted. Of course, you should also share, and you can support the show at your own bookshow.com slash support on Patreon or Subscribestar or locals and show your support for the work, for the value, hopefully you're receiving from this. And of course, don't forget, if you're not a subscriber, even if you just come here to troll, or even if you're here like Matthew to defend Marx, then you should subscribe, because that way you'll know when to show up, you'll know what shows are on, when they're on, you'll get notified, right? So, yes, like, share, subscribe, support. Like, share, subscribe, support, there you go. Easy, do one or all of those, please.