 Hi everybody, it's Thursday. We're talking markets with Jim Kramer on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange or Jim AT&T Boeing and Comcast sharing some of that tax savings with employees. Now there are people who are cynical and say obviously this is just some gesture. I don't know if you're making 40 Gs it ain't a gesture. It's meaningful. And I think that sometimes I don't want to question why they do it. I just want to salute companies that give more money to the workers and all these have done that. Now there's also some cynicism as to if these companies just do buybacks and dividends but hey, as you're writing real money, that's good for stocks. Well, I'm coming with a thesis that is reminiscent of when I started the street. First started paper writing about it in 1995, launch in 1996. Pioneer. Yes, because what we were doing is saying, look, the people who own stock have gone from about 50% to 70% and we thought it might go to 80-90 and if that had been the case we'd all be sitting here saying, you know what, this is the greatest thing, buybacks and dividends could put money into many people's pockets. Now it's down to about 50% so it's only putting money in half the people's pockets and then when you look at who does own it, it is the wealthy. So I think if we could educate people more financially which is why we started the street if we could somehow get people to save more except for the obvious, the working poor who can't, of which there are substantial hope they benefit then we would reverse that and suddenly we'd be thinking, well, you know what, we're putting money in people's pockets because a lot of people own stock and this is a good thing. So I'm calling for financial education out of Washington, financial education in the state basis so that people can take advantage of this. Otherwise, the cynical is true, stocks are held more by wealthy people but it doesn't have to be that way, we just need to educate. You also say stocks are the greatest sort of social mobility mechanism. You know, they're the greatest wealth-creator in history and I think that, you know, it is very hard to make this point. Post the NASDAQ crash in 2000 and post the Great Recession but Jeremy Siegel has done amazing work in stocks for the long run, a friend of my dad because they lived in the same building in the side of the towers in Philadelphia and that's a remarkable book and it tells you about how much wealth is created by stocks. I mean, like if everybody had that book, you know, it's almost like we needed like a handbook of how to help Americans save because then they would take advantage of this. You just got to get more people to benefit and that's really the issue for me. I can't change the tax code. I can't change what the companies do but maybe we can help educate people that this may be the preferred way to create wealth and if we do that, we really create a good ripple effect. I think a lot of people around my age are scared of stocks because of the 2008 recession. It makes a ton of sense. No, but I understand because it's like living through the great crash in 29. My grandparents, we didn't have a lot of money but you knew when you were growing up, you just heard about the great crash, great crash, great crash. Now I'm older but the great crash was very much in the minds of my father's generation and of course his parents' generation and I'm afraid that's happened again and we must work mightily to change that since people make so little money even if they compound at the Treasury level. So I think that missing in all of the hoopla Democrat and Republican is how to get people to save better so they can take advantage of whatever the company is doing. Alright, well we hope people follow this advice. Yes. Jim, let's move on to individual stocks. The finish line with some nice same store sales. To read, well, finish line I think can go higher. Remember, Footlocker had one day and then a lot of people thought it had to be over and there were multiple days. I think the same thing could happen in a more muted way to finish line. Obviously Nike reports tonight, this is a good sign for Nike but let's take a look at what they said they're doing and they're in a lot of Macy's and they're seeing almost 3% comp store sales here every year in Macy's. Now you can say, well everybody's going to Macy's to buy sneakers or you can say maybe Macy's traffic has picked up. People are looking for almost minus two comp stores for Macy's. A read through for Macy's from finish line would make you buy Macy's and don't forget they've got almost 6% yield and the cash flow does cover the dividend. And I think they would also benefit from tax reform the retail sector overall. Yeah, definitely. Now, if you look at Bed Bath, the analysts have given up on it. They don't like it. So you could argue if Mr. Gannett at Macy's doesn't have a solution for the internet and Amazon, it could be treated like Bed Bath so I don't want to get people too excited but I think you'll hear first about comp store sales and I don't think the analysts are as negative about Jeff Gannett, the new CEO as they are about the group that's running Bed Bath which they regardless the gang that could shoot string. Alright Jim, Facebook under fire for some age discrimination and ads, what did you think? I mean look, I just think it's a broader theme. The notion these very powerful companies have to be more responsible than companies like newspapers and I think that a lot of these companies Facebook, Amazon, Google which now what they don't get is that the analogues to the old world are not respected. So let's say the New York Times did what Facebook's doing I think they would, no one would care. But Facebook's so powerful every move they make is under scrutiny and they've got to start being aware of that. They need a chief risk officer, risk being what the government might do to them. And I think there's debate over whether Facebook should be responsible for this or the employers themselves. I think it's the employers. But I live in a rational world. Alright Jim, meanwhile what do you have coming up on ManMoney today? Well we have, you know there's this company called Long Island Ice Tea which became Long Island Blockchain. A very cynical move I think, small, small company. And I bring that up as a segue to having American having a Nico Eagle on. Why? Because I think Americans are fascinated by Blockchain so a really good survey by Steve Leesman yesterday about that. Well, they're fascinated by Bitcoin which in the Blockchain angle. And I want to find out whether Ignico feels that maybe gold is no longer this storehouse of wealth as it has been for 4,000 years. I'm asking about gold's relevance to Ignico. I also wanted to see on from Paychex that's important because if there's real job creation why were the numbers not better let's find out. And then I have a company called Ansys. I'm always interested in computer aided design computer aided modeling all the desks had that weaker quarter. Let's see what these guys are doing. They're spending a lot to be able to make their model better but it's been hurting their core business. Alright, big show tonight. 6 p.m. Eastern on CNBC. Thank you. So many more stocks to talk about. We're going to continue on ActionAlertsPlus.com. And I really just want to emphasize we're doing some good stuff here for club members and we just keep layering on things for club members. I'm appealing to you because you're probably, you may be a club member, maybe not. But you know we added a great inbox and we did monthly calls. And now we're starting to do economic bulletins besides just companies and now we've added a TV show. I think you're getting pretty good value for your money. I'm having a lot of fun. Thanks.