 So Sean, we were talking off camera about thin provisioning, you know, so you were not a three-part classic, right? You weren't part of that part of the acquisition team And so now thin provisioning is now part of the portfolio and and you see a lot of companies have announced thin provisioning What's as a quasi outsider to the three-part? What is what is thin provisioning meant to the insider at HP and talk a little bit about you know The thin provisioning and why your contention was it's different It's really core to the three-part value proposition because it's built into the architecture and as Craig was saying We're now in our fourth generation ASIC, which includes the three-part buzzword thin built-in And that's the difference is that it is built in it is native to the architecture versus where it's bolted on and you know Sometimes called a feature Well, my guess is it's not always that well used Three-part almost every customer use it because that's kind of why they bought it and we guarantee that hey give us a chance We'll guarantee you're gonna save at least 50% in your storage. We'll actually buy the rest That's a little bit conservative to us. We usually do better But where it's a bolt-on to check the box on an RFI It's probably not being used and I'd question whether all the other arrays and their customers are getting anywhere close to the benefits The three-part yeah, we've quantified some of that on on wiki bond I mean if you if you you know search three par on wiki bond we actually did a customer Survey where we we actually pulled data. I'm not it was only metadata It was no customer data out of the arrays and did David Fleur did a detailed analysis and It's pretty impressive. No doubt about you guys pioneered that whole space