 Overrated or underrated? The idea of early childhood intervention to set societal ills right? Overrated, because it's in, to my mind, it's just another form. So it became politically impermissible to say that certain people in society would never make it because they were genetically inferior. So I feel like that group is like, all right, we can't say that anymore. We'll just move the goalpost up two years, and we'll say, well, if you don't get, or three years, if you don't get the right kind of stimulation by the time you're three, basically it's curtains. So it's like, why is that argument, which we decided we didn't like it when they set the goalpost at zero? And somehow it's like super important and legitimate and, you know, chin stroking worthy when they move the goalpost to three. Truth is like, it's not over at three anymore than it was over at zero. Like, there are certain things that will be nice to get done by the age of three. But if they're not, the idea that it's curtains is preposterous. It's the same kind of fatalism that I thought we had defeated, you know? And the, I mean, you could make a really, if you wanna say that the goalpost should be at 30, then I'm open to it. Would you settle for 55?