 Now, we will see that making decisions when there is a lead time. Lead time is the amount of the time that passes from start of the process till the end of the conclusion. That is, the beginning of a therapy leads to the conclusion of the lead time. It is claimed that decisions made on the spur of the moment, intuitively or instinctively, preferably to be compared with a very rigorous consideration. Generally, even in the beginning of the therapy, the mental health professionals make decisions like this about an individual who comes to their mind in the first place. We say that it is an intuitive decision or a decision made on the spur of the moment. However, other research confirms that complex, difficult decision-deserved, active planning whereas the trust-your-gut approach is not only an ill-advice, but possibly even dangerous. Research rigorously proposes that our gut feelings about any decisions for any client are mostly wrong. We need to discuss all kinds of factors, such as proper effort, case formulation, case designing, and then we need to discuss all kinds of factors and then reach a scientific conclusion. When ethical dilemmas arise and a decision must be taken, the best potential outcome is significantly more likely if few of the other factors are also present, including sufficient time to collect all important information, needed to explore options, consultation, intervention and follow-up. Research tells us that we should never take a decision on the basis of our gut feelings or the spur of the moment feelings. In fact, whenever an ethical dilemma arises, we should take a final decision from proper consultation, intervention, discussion, with peer colleagues, and then we should take a final decision about it. An opportunity to involve all relevant parties should include all relevant stakeholders, whether they are clients, therapists, parents, agencies, or government bodies. We need to take the case in a relevant loophole and approach all of them. Operating under low stress and a mindset that maximizes objectivity. We should never take a decision on stress. We should always manage our stress in a very objective way. We should design all kinds of tasks. Maintaining a continuous evaluation that enables for mid-course modification and other changes to satisfy revolving dilemma. It is very important that we continuously evaluate and monitor all of these processes so that we can understand that there is no ethical dilemma Then all mental health professionals should internalize a decision-making strategy to assist in coping with every ethical matter as it arises. Then lastly, it is very important that whatever decision-making strategy a mental health professional makes, first internalize it, understand what its dynamics are, on what basis are we going to take any decision for any client. And then we should understand it in a very ethical way and deliver it. Because as we talk about a lot of unethical experiments in the past, they eventually teach us that some of the cases were designed based on predigious rabbis. For example, I gave you an example of Dr. John that he has a stuttering problem and he was inducing speech problems in his 22 children who believed that this was only because of learning. When it is not like that, then sometimes we do such unethical practices just because of our beliefs which can be damaging to our clients. So when we decide that we are having that decision-making strategy and we have to implement it and on the face of implementation, we need to look at its ethical points in every step and whether we have designed it because of some bias because if our personal biases are integrated into it, then it can be a very big ethical dilemma.